Advertisement

Designing Online Learning Activities for Collaborative Learning Among Engineering Students

  • Anuradha PeramunugamageEmail author
  • H. Uditha W. RatnayakeEmail author
  • Shironica P. KarunanayakaEmail author
  • Rangika U. HalwaturaEmail author
Conference paper
  • 25 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1134)

Abstract

Engineering is a field or discipline, practice, profession and art to cater to social needs. Always it works in the real world. Therefore, having hands-on experience and working with a group of people will contribute better solutions to society need. Higher education is the place where students get an opportunity to work with peers with similar interests. Collaborative learning is active learning which contributes many outcomes that are beneficial to learners and all other group members in participating and getting responsibility for their own learning. This research is to find out how we can improve Sri Lankan engineering students’ interaction via collaborative learning by using mobile technology. Furthermore, we try to answer the question how Moodle mobile APP based instructional activities can be designed and developed as tools to enhance student interactions among engineering students to achieve outcome based education? Design-Based Research (DBR) approach was taken to develop the course for online collaborative learning. Gilly Salmon’s five stage model was adopted to deliver the course. All facts considered, applying Salmon’s five stage framework to design blended courses could highly result in providing active online and traditional learning .

Keywords

Collaborative learning Engineering education Student-centered learning and web-based learning 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This study was conducted at the University of Moratuwa, Sri Lanka. We would like to express our gratitude to all the lecturers, non-academic staff and the students who were involved in the study. We express our special thanks and appreciation to Mr. Ruwan Attanayaka, Mr. Waruna Adikariarachchi, Mr. Oshada Akalanka and all CIT studio staff and CITES at the University.

References

  1. Amiel, T., Reeves, T.C.: Design-based research and educational technology: rethinking technology and the research agenda. Educ. Technol. Soc. 11, 29–40 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0325-00752011000100012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barker, P.: Technology in support of collaborative learning. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 19(1), 65–83 (2007). http://www.jstor.org/stable/23363869
  3. Chen, P., Dong, J., Hernandez, A.: Impact of collaborative project-based learning on self-efficacy of urban minority students in engineering. J. Urban Learn. Teach. Res. 11, 26–39 (2015). IMPACT, 11, pp. 1–35Google Scholar
  4. Cheong, C., Bruno, V., Cheong, F.: Designing a mobile-app-based collaborative learning system. J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Innov. Pract. 11, 97–119 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1145/2307849.2307856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Forehand, M.: Bloom’s Taxanomy, p. 10. University of Georgia (2011).  https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412957403.n51
  6. Herrington, J., Reeves, T.C., Oliver, R.: Researching authentic e-learning, pp. 1–18 (2010a)Google Scholar
  7. Herrington, J., Reeves, T.C., Oliver, R.: A guide to authentic e-learning. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 42, E11–E12 (2010b).  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01154_4.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jeong, H., Hmelo-Silver, C.E.: Seven affordances of computer-supported collaborative learning: how to support collaborative learning? How can technologies help? Educ. Psychol. 51(2), 247–265 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1158654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Li, W., Brill, J.: Fostering interaction in distance learning through purposeful technology integration in support of learning goals. In: Annual Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (38th, Indianapolis, Indiana, 2015), vol. 2, pp. 260–263 (2015). http://ezaccess.libraries.psu.edu/login?, https://search.proquest.com/docview/1871568157?accountid?=?13158
  10. Muuro, M.E., et al.: ‘Students’ perceived challenges in an online collaborative learning environment: a case of higher learning institutions in Nairobi, Kenya. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distance Learn. 15(6), 132–161 (2014). http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1048242
  11. Peramunugamage, A., Usoof, H., Hapuarachchi, J.: Moodle mobile plugin for problem-based learning (PBL) in engineering education. In: 2019 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 9–11 April 2019. American University in Dubai, Dubai, UAE (2019). 978–1-5386-9506-7/19/$31.00 ©2019 IEEEGoogle Scholar
  12. Rogers, D.L.: A paradigm shift: technology integration for higher education in the new millennium. Educ. Technol. Rev. (2002)Google Scholar
  13. Ruzmetova, M.: Applying Gilly Salmon’s five stage model for designing blended courses. Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları/J. Lang. Lit. Stud. (17), 271–290 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.30767/diledeara.418085
  14. Salmon, G., Nie, M., Edirisingha, P.: Developing a five-stage model of learning in second life. Educ. Res. 52(2), 169–182 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2010.482744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Wicking, K., et al.: No more lonely learning: applying Salmon’s Carpe Diem process of subject re-design to three fully online postgraduate nursing subjects in a regional Australian university Background. In: Ascilite, pp. 642–647 (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Open University of Sri LankaNawalaSri Lanka
  2. 2.University of MoratuwaMoratuwaSri Lanka

Personalised recommendations