Advertisement

Authentic e-Learning Perspectives from Online Facilitators in a Developing Country

  • Amy Ooi Mei Wong
  • Kevin Kam Fung YuenEmail author
Conference paper
  • 20 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1135)

Abstract

Although the implementation of e-learning has reached advanced stages in developed countries, it is still in its infancy in many developing countries. This paper examined the benefits and challenges of e-learning as well as the concept of authentic e-learning. To better understand authentic learning in online environments in developing countries, data was collected from 52 faculty members of an institution in India. As participants of a Faculty Online Facilitation course, the faculty members were asked to share their views on how they would go about establishing presence and facilitating an online class in their institution. They were also asked to share their preferred choice of communication tools and elaborate on the reasons for selecting the tools. The data was analysed using the text mining approach. The findings of the study provide pedagogical implications on how to design and facilitate authentic e-learning courses for higher education institutions in developing countries.

Keywords

e-Learning Authentic learning Online facilitators Higher education Developing countries 

References

  1. 1.
    Dabbagh, N., Kitsantas, A.: Personal learning environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: a natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. Internet High. Educ. 15(1), 3–8 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dascalu, M., Dessus, P., Bianco, M., Trausan-Matu, S., Nardy, A.: Mining texts, learner productions and strategies with ReaderBench. In: Peña-Ayala, A. (ed.) Educational Data Mining. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol. 524. Springer, Cham (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gasevic, D., Kovanovic, V., Joksimovic, S., Siemens, G.: Where is research on massive open online courses headed? a data analysis of the MOOC Research Initiative. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. 15(5) (2014).  https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1954
  4. 4.
    Heirdsfield, A., Walker, S., Tambyah, M., Beutel, D.: Blackboard as an online learning environment: what do teacher education students and staff think? Austr. J. Teach. Educ. 36(7), 1–16 (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Herrington, J., Kervin, L.: Authentic learning supported by technology: 10 suggestions and cases of integration in classrooms. Educ. Media Int. 44(3), 219–236 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Herrington, J., Reeves, T.C., Oliver, R.: A Guide to Authentic e-Learning. Routledge, London (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jones, T.: TextmineR: Functions for Text Mining and Topic Modeling. R package version 3.0.3 (2019). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=textmineR
  8. 8.
    Lave, J., Wenger, E.: Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Leitner, P., Khalil, M., Ebner, M.: Learning analytics in higher education—a literature review. In: Peña-Ayala, A. (ed.) Learning Analytics: Fundaments, Applications, and Trends. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol. 94. Springer, Cham (2017)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Murtagh, F., Legendre, P.: Ward’s hierarchical agglomerative clustering method: which algorithms implement Ward’s criterion? J. Classif. 31, 274–295 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00357-014-9161-zMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rinker, T.W.: Textstem: Tools for Stemming and Lemmatizing Text Version 0.1.4. Buffalo, New York (2018). http://github.com/trinker/textstem
  12. 12.
    Stern, D.M., Willits, M.D.: Social media killed the LMS: re-imagining the traditional learning management system in the age of blogs and online social networks. Cutting-edge Technol. High. Educ. 1, 347–373 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Teräs, H., Kartoglu, U.: A grounded theory of professional learning in an authentic online professional development program. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. 18(7), 192–212 (2017)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zanjani, N., Nykvist, S.S., Geva, S.: Do students and lecturers actively use collaboration tools in learning management systems? In: Biswas, G., Wong, L-H., Hirashima, T., Chen, W. (eds.) Proceedings of 20th International Conference on Computers in Education, ICCE 2012, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, pp. 698–705 (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of BusinessSingapore University of Social SciencesSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations