Advertisement

Engagement in Learning Through Design and Experimentation with Robots

  • Huberth Perez
  • Igor VernerEmail author
Conference paper
  • 20 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1135)

Abstract

In this research we characterize students’ engagement in learning in robotic environments and factors that influence engagement. We observed robotics activities of a group of 20 eleventh graders from a technological school, majoring in mechanical engineering. We searched for repeated learning behaviors and elicited patterns of student’s engagement. For the analysis of these patterns we applied Goldin’s theory of engagement structures. To determine the factors affecting students’ engagement, we took teachers’ explanations of possible reasons behind the observed students’ behaviors. The explanations and student interviews were used to determine factors of student engagement. Our study explores and extends the group of known engagement structures related to learning in robotic environment. The knowledge of factors of student engagement can facilitate selecting proper strategies of robotics education.

Keywords

Robotics education Student engagement Engagement structures 

Notes

Acknowledgment

A greatest acknowledge Leonid Revzin and Gilad Benski for the generous collaboration and support throughout this research.

References

  1. 1.
    Johnson, J.: Children, robotics, and education. Artif. Life Robot. 7(1), 16–21 (2003).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-003-0265-5MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bers, M.U., Ponte, I., Juelich, K., Viera, A., Schenker, J.: Teachers as designers: integrating robotics in early childhood education. Inf. Technol. Childhood Educ. 2002, 123–145 (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schermerhorn, P., Scheutz, M., Crowell, C.R.: Robot social presence and gender: do females view robots differently than males? In: ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 263–270 (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Goldin, G.A., Epstein, Y.M., Schorr, R.Y., Warner, L.B.: Beliefs and engagement structures: behind the affective dimension of mathematical learning. ZDM – Int. J. Math. Educ. 43(4), 547–560 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Trowler, V.: Student engagement literature review. High. Educ. Acad. 11(1), 1–15 (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Newmann, F.M.: Student Engagement and Achievement in American Secondary Schools. Teachers College Press, New York (1992)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lei, H., Cui, Y., Zhou, W.: Relationships between student engagement and academic achievement: a meta-analysis. Soc. Behav. Pers. Int. J. 46(3), 517–528 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hand, V., Penuel, W.: Engagement vs motivation: creating and sustaining learning in STEM. University of Colorado Boulder, 25 January 2018Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Verner, I., Massarwe, K., Bshouty, D.: Constructs of engagement emerging in an ethnomathematically-based teacher education course. J. Math. Behav. 32(3), 494–507 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Verner, I.M., Revzin, L.B.: Robotics in School Chemistry Laboratories, vol. 630, pp. 127–135 (2017)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kaburlasos, V.G., Vrochidou, E.: Social robots for pedagogical rehabilitation: trends and novel modeling principles. In: Cyber-Physical Systems for Social Applications, pp. 1–21. IGI Global (2019)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rusk, N., Resnick, M., Berg, R., Pezalla-Granlund, M.: New pathways into robotics: strategies for broadening participation. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 17(1), 59–69 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kynigos, C.: Black-and-white-box perspectives to distributed control and constructionism in learning with robotics. In: Proceedings of SIMPAR Workshops, pp. 1–9 (2008)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Barco, A., Albo-Canals, J., Garriga, C.: Engagement based on a customization of an iPod-LEGO robot for a long-term interaction for an educational purpose. In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 124–125. ACM (2014)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    FluidSurveys Team. Exploratory research: what is it? And 4 ways to implement it in your research (2014). http://fluidsurveys.com/university/exploratory-research-4-ways-implement-research/
  16. 16.
    Hatch, J.A.: Doing Qualitative Research in Education Settings. State University of New York Press, Albany (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Technion – Israel Institute of TechnologyHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations