Advertisement

Methodological Approach to Classification of Digital Technologies According to the Criterion of Ecological Effectiveness and Sustainability

  • Sergey V. ShkodinskyEmail author
  • Inna N. Rykova
  • Denis Y. Taburov
Chapter
  • 26 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems book series (LNNS, volume 111)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this work is to substantiate the methodological approach to classification of digital technologies according to the criterion of ecological effectiveness and sustainability. Design/methodology/approach: The logic of the research is built on the necessity for describing the normative and legal foundations of formation of digital technologies in Russia, performing an overview of statistics in this sphere, and building a classification of digital technologies in the interests of development of “green” economy and according to the criteria of ecological effectiveness and financial sustainability and in view of the stages of products’ life cycle. The research is based on the principles of objectivity and systemic character. The authors use a complex scientific approach that is based on application of the methods of systemic analysis, synthesis, and statistical grouping with detailed analysis of the initial materials of the legal, economic, and financial character. The authors use the following methods: abstract and logical, statistical grouping, and forecasting. Besides, the authors use the tools of graphic interpretation of the obtained results. Findings: Studying the specific features of legal regulation of the digital sphere in Russia allows concluding on the necessity for creating the systems of information security of a new generation and formation of a scientific foundation for implementation and successful functioning of digital technologies in Russia. Usage of scientifically substantiated classification of digital technologies according to the level of financial sustainability and ecological security allows determining specific measures for solving the problems of development of digital economy. Evaluation of the indicators of financial sustainability of digital technologies allows determining the problems in the segment of their application in organizations that conduct nature protection activities. Originality/value: The presented scientifically substantiated approach is very original, as it has not analogs in the scientific and special literature. The importance of the presented research consists in the possibility of further development of the studied problems and supplementing it with new approaches and criteria—based on the tendencies of development of the digital economy in the context of ecological performance and sustainability.

Keywords

Digital technologies Ecological performance Classification Sustainability Effectiveness 

References

  1. 1.
    Vasilyeva EV, Deeva EA (2017) Methods of expert evaluations in applied information economy for substantiating the advantages of information systems and technologies. World New Econ 4:14–22Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Basaev ZV (2018) Digitization of economy: Russia in the context of global transformation. World New Econ 12(4):32–38. E-source.  https://doi.org/10.26794/2220-6469-2018-12-4-32-38
  3. 3.
    Perelet RA (2018) Ecological aspects of the digital economy. World New Econ 4:39–45Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Konovalova GI (2019) Development of the methodology of operative management of production at an industrial company in the concept “Industry 4.0”. Manag Russ Abroad 2:79–84Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tukkel IL, Yashin SN, Ivanov AA (2019) Digital transformation as an important part of innovative development. Innovations 3(245):45–50Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kondratyev V (2018) Industry 4.0 and global value chains. Issues Theory Pract Manag 6:39–48Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yakovleva EA (2018) Managing the intellectual resources of employees in the conditions of innovative development of the digital economy. Creat Econ 12(8):1073–1088Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nosova SS (2019) The digital economy in the strategy of integration of production in Russia. Econ Strat 4:18–24Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Figovsky O, Gumarov V (2018) Green technologies. Overview of new scientific and technical developments. Sci Technol 3(336). E-source. http://www.relga.ru/Environ/WebObjects/tgu-www.woa/wa/Main?textid=5324&level1=main&level2=articles. Accessed 29 July 2019
  10. 10.
    Korovin G (2019) Development of the digitization processes in Russia. Ekonomist 6:38–50Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lyaskovskaya EA, Iminova AA (2019) Analysis of the influence of eco-economic index of the subjects of the Ural Federal District on eco-development and green construction. Bull South Ural State Univ 1:14–23Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Krasota TG, Govako AV, Golik AS (2019) Influence of digitization of economy on the change of the structure of the labor market in the modern conditions. Financ Econ 1:487–488Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mezenin VG, Kudryasheva VV (2018) Digitization of economy: strategy, scales, and institutional environment. Bull. Ekaterininsky Inst. 2:19–29. E-source. https://www.niev.ru/izdatelstvo/vypusk-1-41-2018/B_1(41)_04_Meзeнин_Кyдpяшoвa.pdf
  14. 14.
    Alekseeva NN (2019) Role of Russia in the global ecological ratings. E-source. https://ecostandardgroup.ru/about/korporativnaya-otvetstvennost/rating/Mecтo_Poccии_в_глoбaльныx.H.H_Aлeкceeвa.pdf. Accessed 30 July 2019
  15. 15.
    Guryeva MA (2018) Types of regions of the Russian Federation from the position of development of the “green” economy in view of specifics of the economic space. Russ Entrep 19:2787–2810. E-source. file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/tipologiya-regionov-rf-s-pozitsii-razvitiya-zelenoy-ekonomiki-s-uchetom-spetsifiki-ekonomicheskogo-prostranstva.pdf. Accessed 01 Aug 2019Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Teklin BV (2019) How we implemented innovations in IT and made an invention in the sphere of personnel management. Manag Today 2(106):126–129Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Financial Research Institute of the Ministry of Finance of the Russian FederationMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations