Advertisement

Ambiguity in Psychology

Chapter
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

Ambiguity is fundamental to modern psychology, as the mind has to identify meaning in ambiguous information all of the time. Sensation provides us with noisy information that could represent many different states of the world, and our perceptual processes present us with one interpretation, which we believe to be real. From visual and auditory perception to understanding language, and from solving poorly defined problems to identifying our emotions and our relationships with other people, we have to resolve ambiguity and base our decisions and behaviour upon the most plausible reality. How our minds choose which of many possibilities is the most plausible is at the heart of understanding human behaviour, and gives us an insight into how and when ambiguity can be used to enhance creative problem-solving.

Keywords

Ambiguity Psychology Perception Visual cortex Neural networks Sensation 

References

  1. Barnard, P. J. (1985). Interacting cognitive subsystems: A psycholinguistic approach to short-term memory. In A. Ellis (Ed.), Progress in the psychology of language (Vol. 2). Hove, UK: Laurence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.Google Scholar
  2. Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: An experimental and social study. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 11, 717–726.Google Scholar
  4. Chambers, D., & Reisberg, D. (1985). Can mental images be ambiguous? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 317–328.Google Scholar
  5. Chambers, D., & Reisberg, D. (1992). What an image depicts depends on what an image means. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 145–174.Google Scholar
  6. Guilford, J. P., Christensen, P. R., Merrifield, P. R., & Wilson, R. C. (1960). Alternative uses manual. Orange, CA: Sheridan Supply Co.Google Scholar
  7. Kornmeier, J., & Bach. M. (2005). The Necker cube—An ambiguous figure disambiguated in early visual processing. Vision Research, 45, 955–960.Google Scholar
  8. McManus, I. C., Freegard, M., Moore, J., & Rawles, R. (2010). Science in the making: Right hand, left hand—II: The duck-rabbit figure. Laterality, 15, 166–185.Google Scholar
  9. Necker, L. A. (1832). Observations on some remarkable optical phænomena seen in Switzerland; and on an optical phænomenon which occurs on viewing a figure of a crystal or geometrical solid. The London and Edinburgh Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, Third Series, 5, 329–337.Google Scholar
  10. Palmer, S. (2002). Perceptual grouping: It’s later than you think. Psychological Science, 11, 101–106.Google Scholar
  11. Wertheimer, M. (1923). Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt II. Psychologische Forschung, 4, 301–350.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of PsychologyUniversity of PlymouthPlymouthUK

Personalised recommendations