Advertisement

Water Quality Assurance with Constructed Wetlands in Latvia

  • Linda GrinbergaEmail author
Chapter
  • 28 Downloads
Part of the Springer Water book series (SPWA)

Abstract

Constructed wetland is a well-known and widely used method over the countries to improve water quality. This chapter outlines the experience of Latvia in wastewater treatment and nutrient retention in constructed wetlands. In Latvia constructed wetlands as a domestic wastewater treatment systems were initially implemented in the year 2003. Wastewater from small villages with up to 1000 inhabitants was collected and purified in subsurface flow constructed wetlands with flow regime and dimensions adapted to site-specific requirements. Constructed wetlands can provide biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) reduction efficiency up to 98% without a frequent maintenance. Two pilot-scale constructed wetlands for nutrient retention were implemented in agricultural areas and monitored since the year 2014. The monitoring results obtained during the study period showed the reduction of the average concentrations of total nitrogen and total phosphorous by 53% and 89%, respectively. Basing on the initial results presented in this chapter, constructed wetlands could gain more trust to be implemented for water quality assurance as treatment systems for the wastewater from household and agricultural sectors in Latvia.

Keywords

Constructed wetland Nutrient retention Water quality Latvia Wastewater Treatment 

Notes

Acknowledgements

A part of this study was financially supported by the European Union, the European Regional Development Fund, and the Central Baltic Programme project CB295 “Practical actions for holistic drainage management for reduced nutrient inflow to Baltic Sea (NUTRINFLOW)”.

Special thanks to the wetland project supervisors Professor Ainis Lagzdiņš, Associated professor Ēriks Tilgalis and Professor Viesturs Jansons for directing implementation of the constructed wetlands in Latvia.

References

  1. 1.
    Vymazal J (2002) The use of sub-surface constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment in the Czech Republic: 10 years experience. Ecol Eng 18:633–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nivala J, Hoos MB, Cross C, Wallace S, Parkin G (2007) Treatment of landfill leachate using an aerated, horizontal subsurface-flow constructed wetland. Sci Total Environ 380:19–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vrhovšek D, Kukanja V, Bulc T (1996) Constructed wetland (CW) for industrial waste water treatment. Pergamon PII S0043-1354-00114-5Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vymazal J (2007) Removal of nutrients in various types of constructed wetlands. Sci Total Environ 380:48–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fia FRL, de Matos AT, Fia R, Borges AC, Teixeira DL (2012) Organic matter removal and assessment of kinetic parameters in laboratory-scale constructed wetland systems. Acta Scientiarum Technol 34(2):149–156Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    European Commission (1991) Council Directive 91/676/EEC of 12 December 1991 concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources. Off J Eur Commun L375:1–8Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Commission European (1991) Council Directive 91/271/EEC of 21 May 1991 concerning urban wastewater treatment. Off J Eur Commun L135:40–52Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Commission European (2000) Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Off J Eur Commun L327:1–73Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    The Administration of Latvian Environmental Protection Fund (2017) Recommendations for the construction and operation of wastewater storage and local treatment plants (in Latvian), 20 pGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Republic of Latvia Cabinet (2017) Republic of Latvia Cabinet Regulation No. 384, 2017. Regulations regarding the management and registration of decentralized sewerage systems. Latvijas Vēstnesis, 129:5956Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vymazal J (2009) The use constructed wetlands with horizontal sub-surface flow for various types of wastewater. Ecol Eng 35:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vymazal J (2007) Removal of nutrients in vatious types of constructed wetlands. Sci Total Environ 380:48–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zurita F, De Anda J, Belmont MA (2009) Treatment of domestic wastewater and production of commercial flowers in vertical and horizontal subsurface-flow constructed wetlands. Ecol Eng 35:861–869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    State Limited Liability Company (2017) State Limited Liability Company “Latvian Environment, Geology and Meteorology Centre”, 2017. Meteorological observation data. Available at https://www.meteo.lv/en/meteorologija-datu-meklesana/?nid=924
  15. 15.
    Ziverts A (2004) Hydrology (in Latvian). Latvia University of Agriculture, Jelgava, p 104Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    State Limited Liability Company (2018) State Limited Liability Company “Latvian Environment, Geology and Meteorology Centre”, 2018. Meteorological observation data. Available at https://www.meteo.lv/en/meteorologija-datu-meklesana/?nid=924
  17. 17.
    Vymazal J (2009) Removal of organics in constructed wetlands with horizontal sub-surface flow: a review of the field experience. Sci Total Environ 407:3911–3922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Republic of Latvia Cabinet (2015) Republic of Latvia Cabinet Regulation No. 327, 2015. Regulations regarding the sewerage buildings. (in Latvian). Latvijas Vēstnesis, 125:5443Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Republic of Latvia Cabinet (2002) Republic of Latvia Cabinet Regulation No. 34, 2002. Regulations regarding discharge of polluting substances into water. Latvijas Vēstnesis 16:2591Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Brix H, Arias CA (2005) The use of vertical flow constructed wetlands for on-site treatment of domestic wastewater: New Danish guidelines. Ecol Eng 25:491–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Republic of Latvia Cabinet (2014) Republic of Latvia Cabinet Regulation No. 600, 2014. Kārtība, kādā piešķir valsts un Eiropas Savienības atbalstu atklātu projektu konkursu veidā pasākumam “Ieguldījumi materiālajos aktīvos” (in Latvian). Latvijas Vēstnesis, 215:5275Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Grinberga L, Lagzdins A (2017) Nutrient retention in surface flow constructed wetland in agricultural land in Latvia. In: Proceedings of the 8th international scientific conference rural development 2017, pp 593–598Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Grinberga L, Lagzdins A (2017) Nutrient removal by subsurface flow constructed wetland in the farm Mezaciruli. In: 23rd annual international scientific conference research for rural development, 2017, vol 1, pp 160–165Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Latvia University of Life Sciences and TechnologiesJelgavaLatvia

Personalised recommendations