Advertisement

The Benefits of War and the Armaments Industry

  • Renata AllioEmail author
Chapter
  • 20 Downloads
Part of the Palgrave Studies in the History of Economic Thought book series (PHET)

Abstract

Many twentieth-century economists stressed the merits of war and the armaments industry in resolving situations of economic stagnation by favouring public investment and employment, the so-called military Keynesianism. Some economic historians, above all Trebilcock, but some economists too, have given full weight to the technological spin-off of armaments, that is, the positive fallout from the technological innovation made in the armaments sector on peaceful industries and have evaluated the overall economic benefits coming from the demand for armaments. Some Anglo-American economists have referred to the United States, which never suffered from the effects of war on the homeland, in order to consider it right to speak of spin-offs in “economic prosperity” deriving from both the First and the Second World Wars. In fact, the neutral countries and those who saw the war fought in other countries considered the war as a significant factor in economic growth. Some economists, and many pacifists too, have, on the contrary denounced the corruption and interwoven interests that inevitably arise in all countries when arms producers, the military hierarchy and politicians are concerned. The United States was a case in point during the Cold War when common expressions such as “military industrial complex”, “state capitalism” and “Pentagon capitalism” gained currency as terms to describe the economy and politics in the country which laid claim to vast public resources that could have been used for welfare programmes instead. Mention is also made of the Soviet point of view during the Cold War.

Keywords

War welfare Technological spin-off Military Keynesianism Pentagon capitalism Military-industrial complex Cold War Soviet point of view 

References

  1. Aumann, Robert John Israel. 2008. Razionalità, Cooperazione, Conflitto. Intervista sulla Teoria dei Giochi. Brescia: Morcelliana.Google Scholar
  2. Baran, Paul Alexander, and Sweezy, Paul. 1966. Monopoly Capital: An Essay on the American Economical Social Order. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  3. Barnet, Richard Jackson. 1969. The Economy of Death. New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar
  4. Benoit, Émile, and Kenneth Ewart Boulding. 1963. Disarmament and the Economy. New York, Evanston, and London: Harper & Row Publisher.Google Scholar
  5. Bientinesi, Fabrizio. 2017. “An ‘Austrian’ Point of View on Total War. Stefan T. Possony.” In Economists and War. A Heterodox Perspective, edited by Fabrizio Bientinesi and Rosario Patalano, 7–26. New York.Google Scholar
  6. Brezhnev, Leonid Ilyich. 1976. Questioni della Politica Economica del Pcus. Roma: Editori Riuniti.Google Scholar
  7. Burns, Arthur Frank. 1971. “The Defense Sector: An Evaluation of its Economic and Social Impact.” In The War Economy of the United States: Readings on Military Industry and Economy, edited by Seymour Melman, 111–121. New York: St Martin’s Press. Google Scholar
  8. Buzuev, Alexandr Vladimirovich. 1985. Le Multinazionali e il Militarismo. Mosca: Edizioni Progress.Google Scholar
  9. Caruso, Raul. 2017. Economia della pace. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
  10. De Arcangelis, Mario. 1981. La Guerra Elettronica. Dalla Battaglia di Tsushima ai Giorni Nostri. Milano: Mursia.Google Scholar
  11. Desiderio, Alfonso. 2008. Guerre del 21° Secolo. Firenze: Giunti.Google Scholar
  12. Domhoff, William George. 1967. Who Rules America. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  13. ———. 1971. The Higher Circles : The Governing Class in America. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  14. Eichholtz, Dietrich. 1969. Geschichte der deutschen Kriegswirtschaft, 1939–1945. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
  15. Fontanel, Jacques, and Jean-Pierre Matière. 1985. La Préparation à la Guerre. Défense Nationale et Développement. Paris: Colloque Émile-Laugier, UNESCO.Google Scholar
  16. Fridenson, Patrick. 1998. Histoires des Usines Renault. Naissance de la Grande Enterprise 1898–1939. Paris: Edition du Seuil.Google Scholar
  17. Galbraith, John Kenneth. 1967. The New Industrial State. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  18. ———. 1969. How to Control the Military. New York: The New American Library.Google Scholar
  19. Hallgarten, Georg Wolfang Felix. 1972. Storia della corsa agli armamenti. Roma: Editori Riuniti.Google Scholar
  20. Hartley, Keith. 2017. The Economics of Arms. Newcastle Upon Tyne: Agenda.Google Scholar
  21. Hirst, Francis Wrigley. 1911. “The Policy and Finance of Modern Armaments.” In Statistical Social Paper.Google Scholar
  22. ———. 1915. The Political Economy of War. London and Toronto: J. M. Dent & Sons. Google Scholar
  23. Ivanov, Ivan. 1981. I Monopoli Internazionali nella Politica Estera dell’Imperialismo. Mosca: Edizioni Progress.Google Scholar
  24. Joxe, Alain. 1991. Voyage aux Sources de la Guerre. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  25. Kalecki, Michael. 1943. “Political aspect of full employment.” Political Quarterly: 14.Google Scholar
  26. ———. 1962. Szkice o funkcjonowaniu wspolczesnego kapitalizmu. Warszawa: Berlin.Google Scholar
  27. ———. 1972. The Last Phase in the Transformation of Capitalism. New York and London: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  28. Kennan, George Frost. 1982. Possiamo Coesistere? America e Urss dalla Guerra del Vietnam alla Crisi Polacca. Roma: Editori Riuniti.Google Scholar
  29. Kennedy, Paul. 1988. The Rise and Fall of the Great Power: Economic Change and Military Power from 1500 to 2000. London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
  30. Kidron, Michael. 1968. Western Capitalism Since the War. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
  31. Khruschev, Nikita Sergeyevich. 1956. La Politica dell’Unione Sovietica. Rapporto al XX Congresso del PCUS. Roma: Editori Riuniti.Google Scholar
  32. ———. 1964. I Problemi della Pace. Einaudi: Torino.Google Scholar
  33. Landes, David Saul. 1969. The Unbound Prometheus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  34. Léon, Pierre. 1997. “Guerres et Crises 1914–1947.” In Histoire Économique et Sociale du Monde. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
  35. Luttwak, Edward Nicolae. 1983. The Grand Strategy of the Soviet Union. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
  36. Magdoff, Harry. 1969. The Age of Imperialism: The Economics of U.S. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  37. Mandel, Ernest. 1969. An Introduction to Marxist Economic Theory. New York: Merit.Google Scholar
  38. ———. 1975. Late Capitalism. London: Verso Books.Google Scholar
  39. ———. 1978. Late Capitalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  40. McLandress, Herschel. 1968. La paix indésirable? Rapport sur l'utilité des guerres. Préface. Paris: Calmann-Lévy.Google Scholar
  41. Melman, Seymour. 1970. Pentagon Capitalism: The Political Economy of War. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.Google Scholar
  42. ———. 1971. “From Private to Pentagon Capitalism.” In The War Economy of the United States. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  43. Milward, Alan Steele. 1977. War, Economy and Society. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  44. Ministère du Commerce, Direction des Études Techniques. 1919. Rapport Général sur l’Industrie Française, sa Situation, son Avenir. Paris.Google Scholar
  45. Moszkowska, Natalie. 1943. Zur Dynamik des Spätkapitalismus. Zürich, New York: Verlag der Aufbruch.Google Scholar
  46. Petersen, Howard Charles. 1959. “Lo Sviluppo Economico Sovietico e la Politica degli Stati Uniti.” In La Sfida all’America, edited by Giuseppe Buffa, 119–129. Roma: Editori Riuniti.Google Scholar
  47. Possony, Stefan Thomas. 1939. L’Économie de la Guerre Totale. Ses Possibilitès ses Limites. Paris: Librairie de Médicis.Google Scholar
  48. Ricard, Serge. 1986. Theodore Roosevelt et la Justification de l’Impérialisme. Aix-en-Provence: Université de Provence.Google Scholar
  49. Robinson, Joan. 1979. Aspect of Development and Underdevelopment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  50. ———. 1982. “The Arms Race.” The Tanner Lectures on Huma Value, 3. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar
  51. Rosovsky, Henry. 1961. Capital Formation in Japan 1868–1940. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
  52. Perrone, Nicola. 1971. “Prefaction.” In L’Età dell’Imperialismo, edited by Henry Magdoff. Bari: Dedalo Libri.Google Scholar
  53. Schmidt, Christian. 1983. Conséquences Economiques Et Sociales De La Course Aux Armements. Paris: Economica.Google Scholar
  54. Schwartz, Harry. 1959. Comparison of the United States and Soviet Economies. Panel Submitted by Panelists Appearing Before the Subcommittee on Economic Statistics, Joint Economic Committee, Congress of the United States. Washington: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  55. Sedillot, René. 1960. Peugeot. De la Crinoline à la 404. Paris: Plon.Google Scholar
  56. Segreto, Luciano. 1997. Marte e Mercurio. Industria Bellica e Sviluppo Economico in Italia 1861–1940. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
  57. Shaw, Martin. 1984. “War, Imperialism and the State System: a Critique of Orthodox Marxism for the 1980s.” In War, State and Society. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Thompson, Edward Palmer. 1980, Spring. “Notes on Exterminism, the Last Stage of Civilisation.” New Left Review 1 (121).Google Scholar
  59. Tooze, Adam. 2006. The Wages of Destruction: The Making and Breaking of the Nazi Economy. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  60. Trebilcock, Clive. 1969. “Spin-Off” in British Economic History: Armaments and Industry, 1760–1914. The Economic History Review 22 (3): 474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Trebilcock, Clive. 1970. “Legends of the British Armaments History, 1890–1914: A Revision.” Journal on Contemporary History 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Trebilcock, Clive. 1973. “British Armaments and European Industrialization.” Economic History Review 26: 254–272.Google Scholar
  63. Trebilcock, Clive. 1974. “Radicalism and the Armaments Trust.” In Edwardian Radicalism, 1900–1914: Some Aspects of British Capitalism, edited by Andrew JA Morris. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  64. Trebilcock, Clive. 1976. “The British Armament Industry 1890–1914: False Legend and True Utility.” In War, Economy and the Military Mind, edited by Geoffrey Best and Andrew Wheatcroft, 89–107. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  65. Trebilcock, Clive. 1981. The Industrialization of the Continental Power, 1780–1914. London: Longman Group.Google Scholar
  66. United Nations. 1978. Economic and Social Consequences of the Arms Race and of Military Expenditure. New York.Google Scholar
  67. Zimmerman, William. 1971. “The Soviet Union.” In Conflict in World Politics, edited by Steven Spiegel and Kenneth Waltz. Cambridge: Winthrop Publishers Inc.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of TurinTurinItaly

Personalised recommendations