Advertisement

Economic Rationality or Irrelevance of War?

  • Renata AllioEmail author
Chapter
  • 15 Downloads
Part of the Palgrave Studies in the History of Economic Thought book series (PHET)

Abstract

Neoclassical economists at the end of the 1800s chose the path of theoretical analysis and analysed the behaviour of economic agents in an ordered peaceful situation, setting aside phenomena that disturb the aim of general equilibrium, including, obviously, among others, war. They considered that defence of the state was a problem of a political nature, independently of all the economic implications that war, caused for whatever motive, always brings. The second post-war period saw economists with mathematical training, even if they were interested neither in the causes leading to the war, nor in its consequences, applying Game theory to the study of military strategy and economics too, thereby introducing war to areas to be studied by neoclassical economics. They considered it a rational activity (R. Aumann: “if it were not so, how could it be studied?”) within theoretical, logical, mathematical bounds, suitable for the study of any war from the Punic Wars to the World Wars. They calculated strategic gambits and suggested deterrents as the basic factor in avoiding new devastating conflicts. The School of Public Choice maintains that the choice of war can be rational and thinks that it would be more economical to entrust its conduct to private bodies.

Keywords

War as wrong economic choice Rationality of war Mathematical-economists Deterrence Game theory Economic theory of conflicts 

References

  1. Aron, Raymond. 1970. Paix et Guerre entre les Nations. Paris: Calmann-Lévy.Google Scholar
  2. Aumann, Robert John Israel. 2008a. “War and Peace.” Prize Lectures in Economics Sciences. Stockholm: World Scientific Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  3. ———. 2008b. Razionalità, Cooperazione, Conflitto. Intervista sulla Teoria dei Giochi. Brescia: Morcelliana. Google Scholar
  4. Bernholz, Peter. 1985. The International Game of Power. Berlin: Mouton Publishers.Google Scholar
  5. Boulding, Kenneth E. 1962. Conflict and Defense: A General Theory. New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
  6. Braithwaite, Richard, B. 1955. Theory of Games as a Tool for the Moral Philosopher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Cannan, Edwin. 1927. An Economist’s Protest. London: P. S. Kinf & Son Ltd.Google Scholar
  8. Caruso, Raul. 2017. Economia della pace. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
  9. Cournot, Augustin. 1938. Recherches sur les Principes Mathématiques de la Théorie des Richesses. Paris: Librairies des Sciences Politiques et Sociales Marcel Rivière & Cie.Google Scholar
  10. Cramer, Christopher. 2002. “Homo Economicus Goes to War: Methodological Individualism, Rational Choice and the Political Economy of War.” World Development 30: 1845–1864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Finetti, Bruno. 1963. “La Teoria dei Giochi”. Civiltà delle Macchine 4: 61–66.Google Scholar
  12. Edgeworth, Francis Ysidro. 1967 [1881]. Mathematical Psychics. New York: A. M. Kelley.Google Scholar
  13. Enthoven, Alain, and Smith, Wayne K. 1971. How Much is Enough? Shaping the Defense Program, 1961–1969. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  14. Fréchet, Maurice. 1953. “Commentary on the Three Notes of Emile Borel.” Econometrica 21 (1): 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hart, Sergiu. 2005. “An Interview with Robert Aumann.” Macroeconomic Dynamics 9 (5): 683–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hirshleifer, Jack. 1987. “The Economic Approach to Conflict.” In Economic Imperialism: The Economic Method Applied Outside the Field of Economics, edited by Gerard Radnitzky and Peter Bernholz. New York: Paragon House Publishers.Google Scholar
  17. ———. 2001. The Dark Side of the Force: Economic Foundations of Conflict Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Hitch, Charles J., and Roland N. McKean. 1960. The Economics of Defense in the Nuclear Age. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Kennedy, Gavin. 1975. Economics of Defence. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
  20. Le Bras-Chopard, Armelle. 1994. La Guerre. Théories et Idéologies. Paris: Montchrestien.Google Scholar
  21. Luttwak, Edward. 1986. On the Meaning of Victory. Essays on Strategy. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  22. Mann, Michael. 1980. “State and Society 1130–1815: An Analysis of English State Finances.” In Political Power and Social Theory, vol. 1, edited by Maurice Zeitlin. Connecticut: Jai Press.Google Scholar
  23. Melman, Seymour. 1970. Pentagon Capitalism: The Political Economy of War. New York: McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar
  24. ———. 1971. The War Economy of the United States. Readings on Military Industry and Economy. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  25. ———. 1974. The Permanent War Economy: American Capitalism in Decline. New York: Simon & Shuster.Google Scholar
  26. Milward, Alan Steele. 1977. War, Economy and Society. 1939–1945. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  27. Morgenstern, Oskar. 1959. The Question of National Defense. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  28. ———. 1960. The Theory of Games. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Neumann, John von. 1928. “Zur Theorie der Gesellschafsspiele”. Mathematische Annalen 100: 295–320.Google Scholar
  30. ———. 1944. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton: University Press.Google Scholar
  31. ———. 1953, January. “Communication on the Borel Notes”. Econometrica 21 (1): 124–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pizzorno, Alessandro. 1986. “Some Other Kind of Otherness: A Critique of ‘Rational Choice’ Theorie.” In Development, Democracy, and the Art on Trespassing: Essays in Honor of Albert O Hirschman, edited by Alejandro Foxley, Michael S. McPherson, Guillermo O’Donnell. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press. Google Scholar
  33. Quade, Edward S. 1964. Analysis of Military Decisions. Chicago: Rand McNally & Company.Google Scholar
  34. Rapoport, Anatol. 1961. Fights, Games and Debates. Toronto: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  35. ———. 1962. “The Use and Misuse of Game Theory.” Scientific American December, pp. 108–118.Google Scholar
  36. ———. 1964. Strategy and Conscience. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  37. Richardson, Lewis Fry. 1960a. Arms and Insecurity. California: The Boxwood Pacific Grove. Google Scholar
  38. ———. 1960b. Statistics of Deadly Quarrels. California: The Boxwood Pacific Grove.Google Scholar
  39. Robbins, Lionel Charles. 1932. An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  40. ———. 1939. The Economic Causes of War. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
  41. Robinson, Joan. 1982. “The Arm Race.” In The Tanner Lectures on Human Values. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar
  42. Samuelson, Paul Anthony. 1948. Economics. New York-London: McGraw-Hill Book Company. Google Scholar
  43. Sassoon, Donald. 2011. “Si inizia bene, il finale è incerto” Il Sole 24 ore.Google Scholar
  44. Schelling, Thomas C. 1980. The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University. First Edition, 1960.Google Scholar
  45. Schmidt, Christian. 1983. Conséquences Économiques et Sociales de la Course aux Armements. Paris: Economica.Google Scholar
  46. ———. 1991. Penser la guerre, penser l’économie. Paris: Édition Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
  47. Selten, Reinhard Justus Reginald. 1978. “The Chain-Store Paradox.” Theory and Decision 9: 127–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sen, Amartya. 1986. “Rationality, Interest, and Identity.” In Development, Democracy, and the Art on Trespassing: Essays in Honor of Albert O Hirschman, edited by Alejandro Foxley, Michael S. McPherson, Guillermo O’Donnell. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  49. Shubik, Martin. 1959. Strategy and Market Structure (Competition, Oligopoly, and the Theory of Games). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  50. Silberner, Edmund. 1939. La guerre dans la pensée économique du XVIe au XVIIIe siècle. Paris: Librairie du Recueil Sirey.Google Scholar
  51. Singer, David, and Small, Melvin. 1972. The Wages of War, 1816–1965: A Statistical Handbook. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  52. Smith, Adam. 2007 [1776]. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Hampshire: Harriman House Ltd. Google Scholar
  53. Sorokin, Pitrim Alexandrovich. 1937–1941. Social and Cultural Dynamics. New York: American Book Company.Google Scholar
  54. Staley, Eugene. 1935. War and Private Investors. New York: Howard Fertig.Google Scholar
  55. Tullock, Gordon. 1974. The Social Dilemma: The Economics of War and Revolution. Blacksburg: University Publications.Google Scholar
  56. Usher, Dan. 1992. The Welfare Economics of Markets, Voting and Predations. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Veblen, Thorstein. 1917. An Inquiry into the Nature of Peace and the Terms of its Perpetuation. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  58. Wright, Quincy. [1942] 1965. A Study of War. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of TurinTurinItaly

Personalised recommendations