Advertisement

Introduction: Mass Violence and Memory in the Digital Age—Memorialization Unmoored

  • David J. SimonEmail author
  • Eve Monique Zucker
Chapter
  • 7 Downloads
Part of the Palgrave Macmillan Memory Studies book series (PMMS)

Abstract

This chapter introduces the themes of the edited volume, Mass Violence and Memory in the Digital Age: Memorialization Unmoored. States have long sought to monopolize the narrative-producing functions of memorialization. The advent of new technologies, particularly in the digital realm, have permitted non-state actors to engage in greater and more public participation in memorialization, and thereby in the narrative production function it entails. The chapter offers an overview of the types of ‘unmooring’ of memorialization from state control that have occurred more prominently in recent years, and it explores how the internet, artificial intelligence, and other technologies have altered the dynamics—and ethics—of memorialization. It concludes with a summary of the contributions to the rest of the volume.

Bibliography

  1. Aldrich, Robert. Commemorating Colonialism in a Post-Colonial World. E-rea [En ligne], 10.1.2012, mis en ligne le 20 décembre 2012, consulté le 10 novembre 2019. http://journals.openedition.org/erea/2803.  https://doi.org/10.4000/erea.2803
  2. Armenian Genocide Museum and Memorial. www.ArmenianGenocideMuseum.org. Accessed 10 Nov 2019.
  3. Barthes, Roland. 1980. Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
  4. Boellstorff, Tom. 2016. For Whom the Ontology Turns: Theorizing the Digital Real. Current Anthropology 57(4): 387–407. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.1086/687362
  5. Conroy-Krutz, Jeffrey. 2019. “African governments are cracking down on the news media. Their citizens might be okay with that.” Washington Post. Online, May13, 2019. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/05/13/african-governments-are-cracking-down-news-media-their-citizens-might-be-okay-with-that/, accessed January 28, 2020.
  6. Democratic Kampuchea-Open image in new window. 2019.Google Scholar
  7. Draxtor. 2017. The Drax Files: World Makers [Episode 46: Gone Gitmo 10th Anniversary], September 19. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fk9dMYxOE6A. Accessed 30 Oct 2019.
  8. Fagerland, Tor Einar, and Ingeborg Hjorth. 2016. From Patriotic to Transnational Memory Reflections on the Memorial Landscape of Norway ca. 1990–2014. Heritage, Democracy and the Public: Nordic Approaches, Part 3.Google Scholar
  9. Forest, Benjamin, and Juliet Johnson. 2019. Confederate Monuments and the Problem of Forgetting. Cultural Geographies 26 (1): 127–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Griffiths, James. 2019. “World marks 30 years since Tiananmen massacre as China censors all mention.” CNN. Online, June 4, 2019. https://www.cnn.com/2019/06/03/asia/tiananmen-june-4-china-censorship-intl/index.html, accessed January 28, 2020.
  11. Halbwachs, Maurice. 1992 (1941). On Collective Memory. Trans. L. Coser. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hoskins, Andrew. 2011. 7/7 and Connective Memory: Interactional Trajectories of Remembering in Post-Scarcity Culture. Memory Studies 4(3): 269–280. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KzR8IAYpJtrwXLu7mORaJSCs40jmt0RFITfmusdrPxo/edit
  13. Hucal, Sarah. 2019. When a Selfie Goes Too Far: How Holocaust Memorial Sites Around Europe Combat Social Media Disrespect. ABC News Online, March 30, 2019. https://abcnews.go.com/International/selfie-holocaust-memorial-sites-europe-combat-social-media/story?id=62025268. Accessed on 20 Oct 2019.
  14. Hutton, Patrick H. 1988. Collective Memory and Collective Mentalities: The Halbwachs-Ariés Connection. Historical Reflections/Réflexions Historiques 15(2): 311–322. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23232416
  15. Hutton P.H. 2016. Cultural Memory: From the Threshold of Literacy to the Digital Age. In The Memory Phenomenon in Contemporary Historical Writing. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi-org.ezproxy.cul.columbia.edu/10.1057/978-1-137-49466-5_4
  16. Joint House and Senate Hearing, 114 Congress. A Century of Denial: The Armenian Genocide and the Ongoing Quest for Justice, April 23, 2015. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-114jhrg95113/html/CHRG-114jhrg95113.htm
  17. Khao I Dang Refugee Camp. 2019. Facebook.Com. https://www.facebook.com/KhaoIDangRefugeeCampThailand/
  18. Libson, Quinn. 2018. Stock Photo Agencies Cash in on Khmer Rouge Tragedy. Phnom Penh Post, April 23. https://www.phnompenhpost.com/national-post-depth/stock-photo-agencies-cash-khmer-rouge-tragedy
  19. Mock, Karen. 2000. “Hate on the Internet.” In Human rights and the Internet (pp. 141–152). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  20. Ritchin, Fred. 2010. After Photography. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  21. Rutten, Ellen, and Vera Zvereva. 2013. Introduction. In Memory, Conflict and New Media: Web Wars in Post-Socialist States, ed. Fedor Rutton and Zereva. London/New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. The Cold Case Team Diary. 2019. Coldcasediary.Com. https://www.coldcasediary.com/diary
  23. Veix, Joe. 2019. Exploring the Digital Ruins of Second Life – Digg. Digg.Com. https://digg.com/2018/second-life-in-2018
  24. Who Betrayed Anne Frank? Retired FBI Agent Heads Team Trying to Solve Mystery. 2019. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. http://www.post-gazette.com/news/world/2017/11/19/Anne-Frank-Vince-Pankoke-Retired-FBI-agent-investigation-World-War-II-mystery/stories/201711190014

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceYale UniversityNew HavenUSA
  2. 2.Department of AnthropologyColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations