Advertisement

Inching Towards Theory

  • Daniel LambachEmail author
  • Markus Bayer
  • Felix S. Bethke
  • Matteo Dressler
  • Véronique Dudouet
Chapter
  • 13 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter connects and compares our results from previous chapters with recent research in comparative politics and transition research, social movement and contentious politics research, and resistance studies. It also discusses limitations and possible extensions of our research design. We call for further cross-pollination with related fields to advance our understanding of the path dependencies engendered by modes of transition. This entails distinguishing between the driver and the process of transition. To safeguard democratic gains, resistance movements should not content themselves with merely being the cause of transition. Instead, they should try to stay mobilized and exert influence on the transition process so as not to leave the design of democracy to elites.

Keywords

Theory-building Contentious politics Resistance studies Democratic transition Comparative politics Social movements 

References

  1. Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2006). Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Acharya, A., Blackwell, M., & Sen, M. (2018). Deep Roots: How Slavery Still Shapes Southern Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Albertus, M., & Menaldo, V. (2018). Authoritarianism and the Elite Origins of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Andersen, D., Møller, J., Rørbæk, L. L., & Skaaning, S.-E. (2014). State Capacity and Political Regime Stability. Democratization, 21(7), 1305–1325.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2014.960204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Assmann, A., & Shortt, L. (Eds.). (2012). Memory and Political Change. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  6. Barany, Z. (2016). How Armies Respond to Revolutions and Why. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bayer, M. (2017). Swapo Forever? Prospect for Liberal Democracy or Prolonged One-Party Dominance in Namibia. Journal of Namibian Studies, 21, 27–54.Google Scholar
  8. Bayer, M. (2018). The Democratizing Effect of Nonviolent Resistance: How Nonviolent Resistance Featured Democratic Consolidation in Benin (Working Paper) (Vol. 3/2018). Basel: Swisspeace.Google Scholar
  9. Beissinger, M. R. (2013). The Semblance of Democratic Revolution: Coalitions in Ukraine’s Orange Revolution. American Political Science Review, 107(3), 574–592.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055413000294.
  10. Bermeo, N. (2003). Ordinary People in Extraordinary Times: The Citizenry and the Breakdown of Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bethke, F. S., & Pinckney, J. (2019). Non-Violent Resistance and the Quality of Democracy. Conflict Management and Peace Science.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0738894219855918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boix, C. (2003). Democracy and Redistribution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Boudreau, V. (2004). Resisting Dictatorship: Repression and Protest in Southeast Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Butcher, C., Gray, J. L., & Mitchell, L. (2018). Striking It Free? Organized Labor and the Outcomes of Civil Resistance. Journal of Global Security Studies, 3(3), 302–321.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogy010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Butcher, C., & Svensson, I. (2016). Manufacturing Dissent. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 60(2), 311–339.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002714541843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Campbell, A., Gerald, G., & Miller, W. E. (1954). The Voter Decides. Evanston: Row, Peterson and Company.Google Scholar
  17. Carothers, T. (2002). The End of the Transition Paradigm. Journal of Democracy, 13(1), 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Celestino, M. R., & Gleditsch, K. S. (2013). Fresh Carnations or All Thorn, No Rose? Nonviolent Campaigns and Transitions in Autocracies. Journal of Peace Research, 50(3), 385–400.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343312469979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chenoweth, E., & Belgioioso, M. (2019). The Physics of Dissent and the Effects of Movement Momentum. Nature Human Behaviour.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0665-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chenoweth, E., & Stephan, M. J. (2011). Why Civil Resistance Works: The Strategic Logic of Nonviolent Conflict. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Cocking, C., & Drury, J. (2004). Generalization of Efficacy as a Function of Collective Action and Intergroup Relations: Involvement in an Anti-roads Struggle1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(2), 417–444.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02555.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. della Porta, D. (2014). Mobilizing for Democracy: Comparing 1989 and 2011. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. della Porta, D. (2016). Where Did the Revolution Go? Contentious Politics and the Quality of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. della Porta, D. (2018). Protests as Critical Junctures: Some Reflections Towards a Momentous Approach to Social Movements. Social Movement Studies, 1–20.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2018.1555458.
  25. Diamond, L. (2008). The Spirit of Democracy: The Struggle to Build Free Societies Throughout the World. New York: Times Books.Google Scholar
  26. Diamond, L., Horowitz, D. L., Fukuyama, F., & Plattner, M. F. (2014). Reconsidering the Transition Paradigm. Journal of Democracy, 25(1), 86–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Drury, J., & Reicher, S. (1999). The Intergroup Dynamics of Collective Empowerment: Substantiating the Social Identity Model of Crowd Behavior. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 2(4), 381–402.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430299024005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dudouet, V. (2017). Powering to Peace: Integrated Civil Resistance and Peacebuilding Strategies (Special Report) (Vol. 1). Washington, DC: International Center on Nonviolent Conflict.Google Scholar
  29. Encarnación, O. G. (2000). Beyond Transitions: The Politics of Democratic Consolidation. Comparative Politics, 32(4), 479–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Enos, R. D., Kaufman, A. R., & Sands, M. L. (2019). Can Violent Protest Change Local Policy Support? Evidence from the Aftermath of the 1992 Los Angeles Riot. American Political Science Review, 1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055419000340.
  31. Fearon, J. D. (2011). Self-Enforcing Democracy. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(4), 1661–1708.  https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjr038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fishman, R. M. (2017). How Civil Society Matters in Democratization: Setting the Boundaries of Post-transition Political Inclusion. Comparative Politics, 49(3), 391–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fortin, J. (2012). Is There a Necessary Condition for Democracy? The Role of State Capacity in Postcommunist Countries. Comparative Political Studies, 45(7), 903–930.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414011428587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gandhi, M. K. (1948). Constructive Programme: Its Meaning and Place (2nd ed.). Ahmedabad: Navajivan Publishing House.Google Scholar
  35. García-Ponce, O., & Wantchekon, L. (2017). Critical Junctures: Independence Movements and Democracy in Africa.Google Scholar
  36. Gerschewski, J. (2013). The Three Pillars of Stability: Legitimation, Repression, and Co-Optation in Autocratic Regimes. Democratization, 20(1), 13–38.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2013.738860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Grodsky, B. K. (2012). Social Movements and the New State: The Fate of Pro-Democracy Organizations When Democracy Is Won. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Haggard, S., & Kaufman, R. R. (2016). Dictators and Democrats: Masses, Elites and Regime Change. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hale, H. E. (2019). How Should We Now Conceptualize Protest, Diffusion, and Regime Change? Journal of Conflict Resolution, 0022002719862427.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002719862427.
  40. Heller, P. (2009). Democratic Deepening in India and South Africa. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 44(1), 123–149.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909608098679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Heller, P. (2019). Divergent Trajectories of Democratic Deepening: Comparing Brazil, India, and South Africa. Theory and Society, 48(3), 351–382.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-019-09351-7.
  42. Hollyer, J. R., Rosendorff, B. P., & Vreeland, J. R. (2018). Transparency, Protest and Democratic Stability. British Journal of Political Science, 1–27.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123417000308.
  43. Igarashi, S. (2008). The Dilemma of Democratic Consolidation in the Philippines: The Contested Role of Civic Organizations in Electoral Governance. Philippine Political Science Journal, 29(52), 79–116.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01154451.2008.9723509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kadivar, M. A. (2018). Mass Mobilization and the Durability of New Democracies. American Sociological Review, 83(2), 390–417.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122418759546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kadivar, M. A., Usmani, A., & Bradlow, B. H. (2019). The Long March: Deep Democracy in Cross-National Perspective. Social Forces.  https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soz050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kapstein, E. B., & Converse, N. (2008). The Fate of Young Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Keefer, P. (2007). Clientelism, Credibility, and the Policy Choices of Young Democracies. American Journal of Political Science, 51(4), 804–821.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00282.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kendall-Taylor, A., & Frantz, E. (2014). How Autocracies Fall. The Washington Quarterly, 37(1), 35–47.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2014.893172.
  49. Kim, N. K., & Kroeger, A. M. (2019). Conquering and Coercing: Nonviolent Anti-regime Protests and the Pathways to Democracy. Journal of Peace Research, 56(5), 650–666.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343319830267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kinsman, J., & Bassuener, K. (2013). A Diplomat’s Handbook for Democracy Development Support (3rd ed.). Waterloo: Centre for International Governance Innovation.Google Scholar
  51. Klandermans, B. (2004). The Demand and Supply of Participation: Social-Psychological Correlates of Participation in Social Movements. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements (pp. 360–379). Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  52. Kodila-Tedika, O., & Asongu, S. (2018). Resistance to European Domination: Institutional Mechanism (MPRA Paper) (Vol. 85237). Munich: Munich Personal RePEc Archive.Google Scholar
  53. Kuehn, D. (2017). Midwives or Gravediggers of Democracy? The Military’s Impact on Democratic Development. Democratization, 24(5), 783–800.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2017.1324421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lehoucq, F. (2016). Does Nonviolence Work? Comparative Politics, 48(2), 269–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lichbach, M. I. (1987). Deterrence or Escalation? The Puzzle of Aggregate Studies of Repression and Dissent. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 31(2), 266–297.  https://doi.org/10.2307/174013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Linz, J. J., & Stepan, A. (Eds.). (1978). The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes. Crisis, Breakdown and Reequilibration. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Linz, J., & Stepan, A. (1996). Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: South America, Southern Europe, and Post-communist Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Little, A. T., Tucker, J. A., & LaGatta, T. (2015). Elections, Protest, and Alternation of Power. The Journal of Politics, 77(4), 1142–1156.  https://doi.org/10.1086/682569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lutscher, P. M. (2015). The More Fragmented the Better?—The Impact of Armed Forces Structure on Defection during Nonviolent Popular Uprisings. International Interactions, 42(2), 350–375.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03050629.2016.1093476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Massey, D. (2005). For Space. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  61. Melber, H., Kromrey, D., & Welz, M. (2017). Changing of the Guard? An Anatomy of Power Within SWAPO of Namibia. African Affairs, 116(463), 284–310.  https://doi.org/10.1093/afraf/adw073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Merkel, W. (2004). Embedded and Defective Democracies. Democratization, 11(5), 33–58.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13510340412331304598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Mihr, A., Pickel, G., & Pickel, S. (Eds.). (2018). Handbuch Transitional Justice: Aufarbeitung von Unrecht - hin zur Rechtsstaatlichkeit und Demokratie [Springer Reference Sozialwissenschaften]. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
  64. Miller, W. E., Miller, A. H., & Schneider, E. J. (1980). American National Election Studies Data Sourcebook, 1952–1978. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Muriaas, R. L., Rakner, L., & Skage, I. A. (2016). Political Capital of Ruling Parties After Regime Change: Contrasting Successful Insurgencies to Peaceful Pro-Democracy Movements. Civil Wars, 18(2), 175–191.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13698249.2016.1205563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. O‘Donnell, G., Schmitter, P. C., & Whitehead, L. (Eds.). (1986). Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Comparative Perspectives. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Papagianni, K. (2009). Political Transitions After Peace Agreements: The Importance of Consultative and Inclusive Political Processes. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 3(1), 47–63.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17502970802608175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Pinckney, J. (2018). When Civil Resistance Succeeds: Building Democracy After Popular Nonviolent Uprisings. Washington, DC: International Center on Nonviolent Conflict.Google Scholar
  69. Powell, J., Faulkner, C., Dean, W., & Romano, K. (2018). Give Them Toys? Military Allocations and Regime Stability in Transitional Democracies. Democratization, 25(7), 1153–1172.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2018.1450389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Rivera, T. C. (2002). Transition Pathways and Democratic Consolidation in Post-Marcos Philippines. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 24(3), 466–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Routledge, P. (2017). Space Invaders: Radical Geographies of Protest. London: Pluto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Schock, K. (2005). Unarmed Insurrections: People Power Movements in Nondemocracies. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  74. Schock, K. (2015). Rightful Radical Resistance: Mass Mobilization and Land Struggles in India and Brazil. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 20(4), 493–515.  https://doi.org/10.17813/1086-671x-20-4-493.
  75. Scott, J. C. (1985). Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Sharp, G. (1973a). The Politics of Nonviolent Action. Part Three: The Dynamics of Nonviolent Action. Boston: Porter Sargent.Google Scholar
  77. Sharp, G. (1973b). The Politics of Nonviolent Action. Part One: Power and Struggle. Boston: Porter Sargent.Google Scholar
  78. Sharp, G. (2008). Von der Diktatur zur Demokratie. Ein Leitfaden für die Befreiung. München.Google Scholar
  79. Svensson, I., & Lindgren, M. (2010). Community and Consent: Unarmed Insurrections in Non-Democracies. European Journal of International Relations, 17(1), 97–120.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066109350049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Svolik, M. W. (2015). Which Democracies Will Last? Coups, Incumbent Takeovers, and the Dynamic of Democratic Consolidation. British Journal of Political Science, 45(4), 715–738.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123413000550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Tarrow, S. (1998). Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Thurber, C. (2019). Social Ties and the Strategy of Civil Resistance. International Studies Quarterly.  https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqz049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Tomini, L., & Wagemann, C. (2018). Varieties of Contemporary Democratic Breakdown and Regression: A Comparative Analysis. European Journal of Political Research, 57(3), 687–716.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Tusalem, R. F. (2014). Bringing the Military Back In: The Politicisation of the Military and Its Effect on Democratic Consolidation. International Political Science Review, 35(4), 482–501.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512113496683.
  85. Usmani, A. (2018). Democracy and the Class Struggle. American Journal of Sociology, 124(3), 664–704.  https://doi.org/10.1086/700235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Vinthagen, S. (2015). A Theory of Nonviolent Action: How Civil Resistance Works. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  87. Waldner, D., & Lust, E. (2018). Unwelcome Change: Coming to Terms with Democratic Backsliding. Annual Review of Political Science, 21(1), 93–113.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050517-114628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wang, A. H.-E. (2019). Patience, Dynamic of Protest, and Democratic Consolidation. European Political Science, 18(3), 473–490.  https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-018-0177-4.
  89. Wanis-St. John, A., & Rosen, N. (2017). Negotiating Civil Resistance. Peaceworks (Vol. 12). Washington, DC: United States Institute for Peace.Google Scholar
  90. Welzel, C. (2007). Are Levels of Democracy Affected by Mass Attitudes? Testing Attainment and Sustainment Effects on Democracy. International Political Science Review/Revue internationale de science politique, 28(4), 397–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel Lambach
    • 1
    Email author
  • Markus Bayer
    • 2
  • Felix S. Bethke
    • 3
  • Matteo Dressler
    • 4
  • Véronique Dudouet
    • 5
  1. 1.Goethe University FrankfurtFrankfurtGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Political ScienceUniversity of Duisburg-EssenDuisburgGermany
  3. 3.Peace Research Institute FrankfurtFrankfurtGermany
  4. 4.Flemish Peace InstituteBrusselsBelgium
  5. 5.Conflict Transformation ResearchBerghof Foundation BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations