Advertisement

A Method to Implement a Monitoring System Based on Low-Cost Sensors for Micro-environmental Conditions Monitoring in Greenhouses

  • Elio RomanoEmail author
  • Massimo Brambilla
  • Pietro Toscano
  • Carlo Bisaglia
Conference paper
  • 37 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 67)

Abstract

The precise monitoring of the inner microclimate of a greenhouse implies an increase of the production costs following the expensive needed sensor arrays. Currently, there is availability of low-cost sensors and cards for data storage and processing, but their application in real scale facilities is still under study. This research aimed to find a solution to manage and implement the outcome of various information (i.e. luminosity as well as air humidity and temperature) on the internal environment of a tunnel greenhouse to point out the most critical dynamics occurring during the growth cycle of basil plants in summer. Placing low-cost sensors inside a tunnel greenhouse made it possible to acquire data with an adequate rate (0.1 min−1) and spatiotemporal distribution throughout the facility. Data storage and processing took place thanks to an on purpose created weather station based on Arduino Yun Rev2 board. The highest variability of air temperature and moisture inside the greenhouse occurred when the solar radiation begins to heat the cover of the greenhouse (between 6.00 and 7.00 AM) and few hours after the maximum peak of solar radiation (843.4 ± 133.3 W/m2). Low-cost sensors combined with spatial fitting of the data provided insights about the effective microenvironmental conditions occurring on daily basis. This, implemented with IoT technologies, will be the base for the realization of economic monitoring systems.

Keywords

Air temperature Air moisture Protected crops Arduino board Remote control 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Italian Ministry of Agriculture (MiPAAF) under the AGROENER project (D.D. n. 26329, 1st April 2016)—http://agroener.crea.gov.it/.

The authors are very grateful to Mr. Gianluigi Rozzoni, Mr. Ivan Carminati, Mr. Stefano Basile, Mr. Alex Filisetti, Mr. Elia Premoli and Mr. Walter Antonioli for their valuable help in the setting up of the experimental greenhouse.

References

  1. Ahemd, H. A., Al-Faraj, A. A., & Abdel-Ghany, A. M. (2016). Shading greenhouses to improve the microclimate, energy and water saving in hot regions: A review. Scientia Horticulturae, 201, 36–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carvajal-Arango, R., Zuluaga-Holguín, D., & Mejía-Gutiérrez, R. (2016). A systems-engineering approach for virtual/real analysis and validation of an automated greenhouse irrigation system. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing, 10, 355–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cloete, N. A., Malekian, R., & Nair, L. (2016). Design of smart sensors for realtime water quality monitoring. IEEE Access, 4, 3975–3990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gao, Y., Cheng, Y., Zhang, H., & Zou, N. (2019). Dynamic illuminance measurement and controlGoogle Scholar
  5. Gruda, N., Bisbis, M., & Tanny, J. (2019). Influence of climate change on protected cultivation: Impacts and sustainable adaptation strategies—A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 225, 481–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Guzmán, C. H., Carrera, J. L., Durán, H. A., Berumen, J., Ortiz, A. A., Guirette, O. A., Arroyo, A., Brizuela, J. A., Gómez, F., Blanco, A., Azcaray, H. R., & Hernández, M. (2019). Implementation of virtual sensors for monitoring temperature in greenhouses using CFD and control. Sensors, 19, 60.  https://doi.org/10.3390/s19010060
  7. Kolapkar, M. M., Khirade, P. W., & Sayyad, S. B. (2016). Design and development of embedded system for measurement of humidity, soil moisture and temperature in Polyhouse using 89E516RD microcontroller. International Journal of Advanced Agricultural Sciences and Technology, 5(1), 96–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kumar, S. (2014). Mobile sensor systems for field estimation and “hot spot” identification. Thesis: Ph.D., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, 2014. https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/87977. Accessed June 2019
  9. Minitab. (2010). Minitab 17 statistical software. State college, PA: Minitab.Google Scholar
  10. Miranda, J., Ponce, P., Molina, A., & Wright, P. (2019). Sensing, smart and sustainable technologies for Agri-Food 4.0. Computers in Industry, 108, 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Oliveira, J., Boaventura-Cunha, J., & Oliveira, P. M. (2016). Automation and control in greenhouses: State-of-the-art and future trends. In CONTROLO 2016, Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017; Volume 402, pp. 597–606.Google Scholar
  12. Postolache, O., Pereira J. M., Girão P. S., & Monteiro A. A. (2012). Greenhouse environment: Air and water monitoring, In Smart Sensing Technology for Agriculture and Environmental Monitoring. Mukhopadhyay, S. C. Ed. 81–102. Springer.Google Scholar
  13. R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/.
  14. Ray, P. P. (2018). Internet of Things-based approximation of sun radiative-evapotranspiration models. Journal of Agrometeorology, 20(2), 171–173.Google Scholar
  15. Roberts, Alley E. (2007). Pollutant classification. Water quality control handbook, Alexandria (2nd ed., pp. 42–51). Virginia: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  16. Shamshiri, R., Kalantari, F., Ting, K., Thorp, K. R., Hameed, I. A., Weltzien, C., et al. (2018). Advances in greenhouse automation and controlled environment agriculture: A transition to plant factories and urban agriculture. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 11, 1–22.Google Scholar
  17. Sowmya, D., & Praveen Sam, R. (2018). Low Cost and PI based smart home garden watering system using iOT. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE), 7(6S), 399–402.Google Scholar
  18. Used for smart lighting with LED, Measurement, 139, 380–386Google Scholar
  19. Wackernagel, H. (1995) Ordinary Kriging. In Multivariate Geostatistics. Springer, Berlin, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  20. Yeow Tan, W., Lung Then, Y., Long Lew, Y., & Siang Tay, F. (2018). Newly calibrated analytical models for soil moisture content and pH Value by Low-Cost YL-69 hygrometer sensor. Measurement.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.10.071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elio Romano
    • 1
    Email author
  • Massimo Brambilla
    • 1
  • Pietro Toscano
    • 1
  • Carlo Bisaglia
    • 1
  1. 1.Consiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l’analisi dell’economia agraria (CREA), Research Centre for Engineering and Agrofood ProcessingTreviglioItaly

Personalised recommendations