Advertisement

Hydraulic Modeling of Field Experiments in a Drainage Channel Under Different Riparian Vegetation Scenarios

  • G. F. C. LamaEmail author
  • A. Errico
  • S. Francalanci
  • G. B. Chirico
  • L. Solari
  • F. Preti
Conference paper
  • 30 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 67)

Abstract

A hydraulic model was implemented for interpreting the real-scale hydraulic tests conducted in a vegetated drainage channel, colonized by dormant Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud. (common reed), located in the San Rossore-Migliarino-Massaciuccoli Regional Park (Tuscany, Italy). The hydraulic tests encompassed six flow rates and three vegetation scenarios: (a) natural scenario, with common reed fully covering the drainage channel; (b) side vegetation scenario, achieved by removing the in-stream reed just in the central portion of the channel, with two lateral buffers of undisturbed vegetation and (c) unvegetated scenario, corresponding to the complete removal of the riparian reed plants. The outputs of the simulation were compared with the experimental flow average velocities and vegetative Manning’s roughness coefficient, obtained from measured punctual flow velocities by means of an acoustic Doppler velocimeter (ADV) and a propeller-type current meter, respectively located at the upstream and downstream cross sections of the experimental stretch of the drainage channel. The results of this study are discussed for assessing the impact of the vegetation management scenarios on both hydraulic conveyance and riparian habitat functionality of the examined vegetated drainage channel.

Keywords

Riparian plants management Real scale experiments Hydraulic modeling Flow velocity field Vegetative manning’s roughness coefficient 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Part of the research was funded by the Interreg EU project “Assistere l’adattamento ai cambiamenti climatici dei sistemi urbani dello spazio transfrontaliero—ADAPT, Interreg. Italia-Francia Marittimo 2014–2020 CUP B19J1600289000”. The Authors thank Consorzio di Bonifica 1 Toscana Nord for funding the tests, Eng. Leonardo Giannecchini and Eng. Daniele Maffi for their support.

References

  1. Errico, A., Pasquino, V., Maxwald, M., Chirico, G. B., Solari, L., & Preti, F. (2018). The effect of flexible vegetation on flow in drainage channels: Estimation of roughness coefficients at the real scale. Ecological Engineering, 120, 411–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Errico, A., Lama, G. F. C., Francalanci, S., Chirico, G. B., Solari, L., & Preti, F. (2019a). Flow dynamics and turbulence patterns in a drainage channel colonized by common reed (Phragmites australis) under different scenarios of vegetation management. Ecological Engineering, 133, 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Errico, A., Lama, G. F. C., Francalanci, S., Chirico, G. B., Solari, L., & Preti, F. (2019). Validation of global flow resistance models in two experimental drainage channels covered by Phragmites australis (common reed). In 38th IAHR World Congress, Panama City.Google Scholar
  4. Fierro, P., Bertràn, C., Tapia, J., Haunstein, E., Peña-Cortés, F., Vergara, C., et al. (2017). Effects of local land-use on riparian vegetation, water quality, and the functional organization of macroinvertebrate assemblages. Science of Total Environment, 609, 724–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Galema, A. (2009). Vegetation resistance; evaluation of vegetation resistance models for flood management. Master Thesis, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  6. Horton, R. E. (1933). Separate roughness coefficients for channel bottoms and sides. Engineering News-Record, 111(22), 652–653.Google Scholar
  7. Pasquino, V., Saulino, L., Pelosi, A., Allevato, E., Rita, A., Todaro, L., et al. (2019). Hydrodynamic behaviour of European black poplar (Populus Nigra L.) under coppice management along Mediterranean river ecosystems. River Research and Applications, 34, 586–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Rhee, D. S., Woo, H., Kwon, B. A., & Ahn, H. K. (2008). Hydraulic resistance of some selected vegetation in open channel flows. River Research and Applications, 24, 673–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Stone, B. M., & Shen, H. T. (2002). Hydraulic Resistance of flow in channels with cylindrical roughness. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 128(5), 500–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Wang, J., & Zhang, Z. (2019). Evaluating riparian vegetation roughness computation methods integrated within Hec-RAS. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 145(6).Google Scholar
  11. Vinatier, F., Bailly, J. S., & Belaud, G. (2017). From 3D grassy vegetation point cloud to hydraulic resistance: Application to close-range estimation of Manning coefficients for intermittent open channels. Ecohydrology, 10(8), e1885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. F. C. Lama
    • 1
    Email author
  • A. Errico
    • 2
  • S. Francalanci
    • 3
  • G. B. Chirico
    • 1
  • L. Solari
    • 3
  • F. Preti
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Agricultural SciencesUniversity of Naples Federico IIPorticiItaly
  2. 2.Department of Agricultural, Food, Environmental and Forestry Sciences and TechnologiesUniversity of FlorenceFlorenceItaly
  3. 3.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of FlorenceFlorenceItaly

Personalised recommendations