Advertisement

A Bottom-Up Approach to Tractor Safety: Improving the Handling of Foldable Roll-Over Protective Structures (FROPS) Through User-Centred Design

  • Lucia Vigoroso
  • Federica CaffaroEmail author
  • Margherita Micheletti Cremasco
  • Ambra Giustetto
  • Giuseppe Paletto
  • Eugenio Cavallo
Conference paper
  • 36 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 67)

Abstract

Rollover Protective Structures (ROPS) are the most effective solution to prevent fatalities in case of tractor rollover. Foldable Rollover Protective Structures (FROPS) have been developed to facilitate tractor operation in low overhead clearance zones. However, many of the fatalities and serious injuries in tractor rollover accidents occur when the FROPS is left by the operator in the folded-down position. Little is known about the reasons of such behavior and few solutions have been suggested to overcome this issue. Adopting a user-centred approach, in the present study a group of farmworkers (n = 21) was observed and interviewed while handling the FROPS on their own tractor, to point out critical behaviors, perceptions of effort and suggestions for technical solutions to support the manual operation of FROPS. A set of FROPS-related objective measurements were also taken. The participants reported moderate levels of perceived effort, as the entity of the force required to operate the FROPS was minimized by the low handling frequency. The observations pointed out that participants adopted some spontaneous strategies to facilitate the handling of the roll-bar during lowering and raising operations. Based on the present results some recommendations for technical adjustments are proposed to encourage the correct use of FROPS to prevent fatal accidents due to tractor rollover.

Keywords

Agriculture Foldable ROPS Human-machine interaction Safety Tractor rollover User-centred design 

References

  1. Abubakar, M. S. A., Ahmad, D., & Akande, F. B. (2010). A review of farm tractor overturning accidents and safety. Pertanika Journal of Science and Technology, 18(2), 377–385.Google Scholar
  2. Ahlstrom, V., & Longo, K. (2003). Human factors design standard. For acquisition of commercial-off-the-shelf subsystems, non-developmental items, and developmental systems. DOT/FAA/CT-96/1 HF-STD-001. US Department of  Transportation Federal Aviation Administration.Google Scholar
  3. Ayers, P., Khorsandi, F., Wang, X., & Araujo, G. (2017). ROPS designs to protect operators during agricultural tractor rollovers. Journal of Terramechanics.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jterra.2017.05.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Biddle, E. A., & Keane, P. R. (2012). Action learning: A new method to increase tractor rollover protective structure (ROPS) adoption. Journal of Agromedicine 14(4), 398–409.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1059924X.2012.713842.
  5. Borg, G. (1998). Borg’s perceived exertion and pain scales (H. Kinetics, Ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
  6. Cavallo, E., Ferrari, E., & Coccia, M. (2015). Likely technological trajectories in agricultural tractors by analysing innovative attitudes of farmers. International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management, 15(2), 158–177.  https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTPM.2015.069203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Donham, K. J., Yoder, A., & Grafft, L. (2016). Acute injuries in agriculture. In K. J. Donham & A. Thelin (Eds.), Agricultural medicine: Rural occupational and environmental health, safety, and prevention (p. 573). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. INAIL (Istituto Nazionale per l’Assicurazione contro gli Infortuni sul Lavoro). (2018). Infor.MO. Gli infortuni mortali in agricoltura. Retrieved from https://www.inail.it/cs/internet/docs/alg-informo-gli-infortuni-mortali-agricoltura.pdf.
  9. ISO (International Organization for Standardization). ISO 7250-2:2010. (2010). Basic human body measurements for technological design—Part 2: Statistical summaries of body measurements from national populations.Google Scholar
  10. ISO (International Organization for Standardization). ISO 9241-210. (2010). Ergonomics of human-system interaction—Human-centred design for interactive systems.Google Scholar
  11. ISTAT (Istituto Nazionale di Statistica). (2013). Atlante dell’agricoltura italiana-6° Censimento Generale dell’Agricoltura [Atlas of Italian agriculture]. ISBN: 978-88-458-1781-6.Google Scholar
  12. Jawa, R. S., Young, D. H., Stothert, J. C., Yetter, D., Dumond, R., Shostrom, V. K., et al. (2013). Farm machinery injuries: The 15-year experience at an urban joint trauma center system in a rural state. Journal of Agromedicine, 18(2), 98–106.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1059924X.2013.766145.
  13. Khorsandi, F., Ayers, P. D., Jackson, D., & Wilkerson, J. (2016). The effect of speed on foldable ROPS actuation forces. Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health, 22(4), 285–298.  https://doi.org/10.13031/jash.22.11752.
  14. Micheletti Cremasco, M., Caffaro, F., Giustetto, A., Vigoroso, L., Paletto, G., & Cavallo, E. (2019). Tractor rollover protection: Is the incorrect use of foldable rollover protective structures due to human or to technical issues? Human Factors, 62, 64–76.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720819848201.
  15. NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health). (2009). Preventing death and injury in tractor overturns with rollover protective structures.Google Scholar
  16. NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health) FACE. (2015). Workplace Safety & Health Topics, Fatality assessment and control evaluation (FACE) program.Google Scholar
  17. OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2017). OECD Standard Code for the official testing of agricultural and forestry tractors. Paris: France.Google Scholar
  18. Pessina, D., & Facchinetti, D. (2011). Il ruolo del web nel monitoraggio degli incidenti mortali dovuti al ribaltimento dei trattori agricoli. Convegno di Medio Termine dell’Associazione Italiana di Ingegneria Agraria AIIA, 22–24.Google Scholar
  19. Pessina, D., & Facchinetti, D. (2017). A survey on fatal accidents for overturning of agricultural tractors in Italy. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 58, 79–84.  https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1758014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pessina, D., Facchinetti, D., & Giordano, D. M. (2016). Narrow-track agricultural tractors: A survey on the load of the hand-operated foldable rollbar. Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health, 22(4), 275–284.  https://doi.org/10.13031/jash.22.11709.
  21. Reynolds, S. J., & Groves, W. (2000). Effectiveness of roll-over protective structures in reducing farm tractor fatalities. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 18(4S), 63–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rondelli, V., Casazza, C., & Martelli, R. (2018). Tractor rollover fatalities, analyzing accident scenario. Journal of Safety Research, 67, 99–106.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2018.09.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sanderson, W. T., Madsen, M. D., Rautiainen, R., Kelly, K. M., Zwerling, C., Taylor, C. D., et al. (2006). Tractor overturn concerns in Iowa: Perspectives from the Keokuk county rural health study. Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health, 12(1), 71–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Spielholz, P., Sjostrom, T., Clark, R. E., & Adams, D. A. (2006). A survey of tractors and rollover protective structures in Washington State. Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health, 12(4), 325–333.  https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.22012.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lucia Vigoroso
    • 1
  • Federica Caffaro
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Margherita Micheletti Cremasco
    • 3
  • Ambra Giustetto
    • 3
  • Giuseppe Paletto
    • 1
  • Eugenio Cavallo
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Agricultural and Earth Moving Machines (IMAMOTER, National Research Council (CNR))TurinItaly
  2. 2.Department of EducationRoma Tre UniversityRomeItaly
  3. 3.Department of Life Sciences and Systems BiologyUniversity of TorinoTurinGermany

Personalised recommendations