Advertisement

The Apulian Territory and the Typical Local Farmhouses: A Case of Study Through Landscape Analysis

  • E. LianoEmail author
  • I. Blanco
  • G. Scarascia Mugnozza
Conference paper
  • 27 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 67)

Abstract

The Apulian territory is strongly characterized by a rural architectural heritage with many historical features. Rural and agro-industrial buildings, their reuse or degradation, are the testimony of a history whose investigation is complex and varied over time. The Regional Territorial Landscape Plan, which entered into force in 2015, promotes the realization of a self-sustainable and lasting socio-economic development and education for an appropriate use of the regional territory. The knowledge, conservation, use and promotion of the Traditional Apulian Architectural Heritage are among its aims. This in fact constitutes the memory of a place, culturally identifies a local community and the territory. In-depth knowledge of the identifying characteristics of the rural heritage is essential before any recovery intervention specifically aimed at protecting and enhancing the buildings, the landscape and the environmental context. A recovery activity, mindful of these issues, can generate strategic resources for reaching wider objectives of regional development. This study aims to analyze the current relationship between ancient Apulian farmhouses that have been subject to functional restoration interventions and the landscape in which they are located, in order to outline strategies for the development and promotion of the related rural area.

Keywords

Architectural heritage Rural buildings Touristic itineraries 

Notes

Contributions

The contribution to programming and conducting this research must be equally shared between the Authors.

References

  1. AA.VV. (1995). Le Masserie storiche del territorio di Palagianello, Catalogo Mostra Documentaria, Edizioni Grafiche Pugliesi—Mottola, Regione Puglia—Assessorato alla Pubblica Istruzione C.R.S.E.C. TA 49—Castellaneta in collaborazione con Amministrazione Comunale e Biblioteca Civica di Palagianello (In Italian).Google Scholar
  2. Apulia Region. (2015). Deliberazione Giunta Regionale n. 176, 16 Febbraio 2015. Approvazione del Piano Paesaggistico Territoriale della Regione Puglia (PPTR). Bollettino Ufficiale della Regione Puglia, n. 40, 23 Marzo 2015 (In Italian).Google Scholar
  3. Apulia Region. (2019). SIT Puglia Website. Retrieved form http://www.sit.puglia.it/portal/sit_portal.
  4. Caliandro, L. P., Loisi, R. V., & Dal Sasso, P. (2014). Connections between masserie and historical roads system in Apulia. Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 45(1), 15–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Council of Europe. (2000). European landscape convention. Florence, 20/10/2000—Treaty open for signature by the member States of the Council of Europe and for accession by the European Union and the European non-member States. CETS No. 176.Google Scholar
  6. De Montis, A. (2016). Measuring the performance of planning: The conformance of Italian landscape planning practices with the European landscape convention. European Planning Studies, 24(9), 1727–1745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. De Montis, A., Ledda, A., Serra, V., Noce, M., Barra, M., & De Montis, S. (2017). A method for analysing and planning rural built-up landscapes: The case of Sardinia, Italy. Land Use Policy, 62, 113–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Italian Regulation. (2004). Legislative Decree No. 42/2004. Code about cultural heritage and landscape. Gazzetta Ufficiale, 45 (In Italian).Google Scholar
  9. Liano, E., Caragnano, D., & Scarascia Mugnozza, G. (2015). The medieval pilgrims routes in the Apulian cave settlements and their relationship with Rome and Santiago de Compostela. In International Conference Proceedings “The European Pilgrimage Routes for Promoting Sustainable and Quality Tourism in Rural Areas, 4–6 December 2014, Firenze, Italy.Google Scholar
  10. Ottomano Palmisano, G., Loisi, R. V., Ruggiero, G., Rocchi, L., Boggia, A., Roma, R., et al. (2016). Using analytic network process and dominance-based rough set approach for sustainable requalification of traditional farm buildings in Southern Italy. Land Use Policy, 59, 95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Pašakarnis, G., Morley, D., & Malienė, V. (2013). Rural development and challenges establishing sustainable land use in Eastern European countries. Land Use Policy, 30(1), 703–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ruggiero, G., Parlavecchia, M., & Dal Sasso, P. (2019). Typological characterisation and territorial distribution of traditional rural buildings in the Apulian territory (Italy). Journal of Cultural Heritage. (in press).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2019.02.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Senes, G., Rovelli, R., Bertoni, D., Arata, L., Fumagalli, N., & Toccolini, A. (2017). Factors influencing greenways use: Definition of a method for estimation in the Italian context. Journal of Transport Geography, 65, 175–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Torreggiani, D., & Tassinari, P. (2012). Landscape quality of farm buildings: The evolution of the design approach in Italy. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 13(1), 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Torreggiani, D., Ludwiczak, Z., Dall’Ara, E., Benni, S., Maino, E., & Tassinari, P. (2014). TRuLAn: A high-resolution method for multi-time analysis of traditional rural landscapes and its application in Emilia-Romagna, Italy. Landscape and Urban Planning, 124, 93–103.Google Scholar
  16. van der Vaart, J. H. P. (2005). Towards a new rural landscape: Consequences of non-agricultural re-use of redundant farm buildis in Friesland. Landscape Urban Planning, 70(1), 143–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Agricultural and Environmental Science (DISAAT)University of Bari Aldo MoroBariItaly
  2. 2.Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Technologies (DiSTeBA)University of SalentoLecceItaly

Personalised recommendations