Proposal of a Web-Based Multi-criteria Spatial Decision Support System (MC-SDSS) for Agriculture

  • Giuseppe ModicaEmail author
  • Maurizio Pollino
  • Luigi La Porta
  • Salvatore Di Fazio
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 67)


The paper reports the main technological characteristics and functionalities of a web-based Multi-criteria Spatial Decision Support System (MC-SDSS) implemented on free open source software for geospatial (FOSS4G) environment. The web-based MC-SDSS was designed to perform land suitability evaluation (LSE) for olive crops and applied to the territory of Calabria (Italy). From a technological point of view, the MC-SDSS was designed on a multi-tier architecture compliant with the Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) services (WFS, web feature service; WCS, web coverage service, and WMS, web map service. Moreover, it was enabled to processes executable via OGC web processing services (WPSs). LSE of olive crops is provided following the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) based on the different judgements obtained from experts and aggregated through the weighted linear combination (WLC). With the aim to implement an effective planning tool, the WebGIS client was designed to manage three different type of users with different level of privileges: Guest, Expert and Decision Maker. The results are expressed as multi-attribute geospatial maps (land suitability maps) and as distribution graphs according to the envisaged land suitability classes (not suitable, low, medium, high and very high suitability).


Land Suitability Evaluation (LSE) Multi-criteria Spatial Decision Support System (MC-SDSS) WebGIS 


  1. Collins, M. G., Steiner, F. R., & Rushman, M. J. (2001). Land-use suitability analysis in the United States: Historical development and promising technological achievements. Environmental Management, 28, 611–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Eastman, R., Jin, W., Kyem, P. A. K., & Toledano, J. (1995). Raster procedures for multi-criteria/multi-objective decisions. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 61, 539–547.Google Scholar
  3. Forman, E., & Peniwati, K. (1998). Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 108, 165–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Malczewski, J. (1999). GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. Modica, G., Laudari, L., Barreca, F., & Fichera, C. R. (2014). A GIS-MCDA based model for the suitability evaluation of traditional grape varieties: The case-study of “Mantonico” grape (Calabria, Italy). International Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Information Systems, 5, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Modica, G., Merlino, A., Solano, F., & Mercurio, R. (2015). An index for the assessment of degraded Mediterranean forest ecosystems. For. Syst., 24, 13.Google Scholar
  7. Modica, G., Pollino, M., Lanucara, S., La Porta, L., Pellicone, G., Di Fazio, S., Fichera, C. R. (2016) Land suitability evaluation for agro-forestry: Definition of a web-based multi-criteria spatial decision support system (MC-SDSS): Preliminary results. In: O. Gervasi et al. (Eds.), Computational science and its applications—ICCSA 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 9788). Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. OGC® Standards. Retrieved from
  9. Pollino, M., & Modica, G. (2013). Free Web mapping tools to characterise landscape dynamics and to favour e-participation. In B. Murgante, S. Misra, M. Carlini, C. M. Torre, H.-Q. Nguyen, D. Taniar, B. O. Apduhan, & O. Gervasi (Eds.), ICCSA 2013, Part III (Vol. 7973, pp. 566–581)., LNCS Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  10. Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting, resource allocation. New York: McGraw-Hill.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Steiniger, S., & Hunter, A. J. S. (2012). Free and open source GIS software for building a spatial data infrastructure. In E. Bocher & M. Neteler (Eds.), Geospatial free and open source software in the 21st century (pp. 247–261). Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Vizzari, M., & Modica, G. (2013). Environmental effectiveness of swine sewage management: A multicriteria AHP-based model for a reliable quick assessment. Environmental Management, 52, 1023–1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Yager, R. R. (1988). On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 18, 183–190.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giuseppe Modica
    • 1
    Email author
  • Maurizio Pollino
    • 2
  • Luigi La Porta
    • 2
  • Salvatore Di Fazio
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di AgrariaUniversità degli Studi Mediterranea di Reggio CalabriaReggio CalabriaItaly
  2. 2.DTE-SEN-APIC LabENEA National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic DevelopmentRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations