Damages to Rural Buildings and Facilities Observed in the Aftermath of 2012 Emilia Earthquakes

  • M. BovoEmail author
  • A. Barbaresi
  • D. Torreggiani
  • P. Tassinari
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 67)


In May 2012, two strong earthquakes hit the northern Italy and caused strong damage to both historical rural heritage and modern agricultural precast facilities. In this paper, damage and collapses observed in the aftermath surveys on historical rural and modern agricultural buildings, are presented and commented. It was observed that in the area hit by the earthquakes few recurrent typologies are present, and buildings of the same typology showed similar damage mechanisms. Therefore, in order to define the most typical damage affecting constructions in the agricultural sector, the stock of the historical rural buildings has been classified in different categories, based on layout and usage of each building. The outcomes presented in this paper allowed to identify the rural building typologies most vulnerable to earthquakes and to define recurring deficiencies for the various categories. The main reasons of the damage to historical buildings can be ascribed to lack of effective connections between orthogonal walls, poor connections and excessive flexibility of floor diaphragms. The main lacks observed in the precast facilities were the absence of mechanical connections between precast elements and the great flexibility of vertical elements inducing large horizontal displacements.


Rural building Traditional technology Precast facilities Seismic damage Building survey Emilia earthquake 


  1. Antrop, M. (2005). Why landscapes of the past are important for the future. Landscape Urban Plan., 70(1–2), 21–34. Scholar
  2. Bovo, M., & Savoia, M. (2018). Numerical simulation of seismic-induced failure of a precast structure during the emilia earthquake. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 32(1), 04017119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bovo, M., Barbaresi, A., Torreggiani, D., & Tassinari, P. (2019). Report on earthquake-induced failures of rural buildings aimed at future preservation strategies. Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 50(2), 66–79. Scholar
  4. Bovo, M., Barbaresi, A., Torreggiani, D., & Tassinari, P. (2020). Collapse and damage to vernacular buildings induced by 2012 Emilia earthquakes. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 18(3), 1049–1080.Google Scholar
  5. Butera, S., Christensen, T. H., & Astrup, T. F. (2015). Life cycle assessment of construction and demolition waste management. Waste Management, 44, 196–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cattari, S., Degli Abbati, S., Ferretti, D., Lagomarsino, S., Ottonelli, D., & Tralli, A. (2013). Damage assessment of fortresses after the 2012 Emilia earthquake (Italy). Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering. Scholar
  7. IESN (Italian Experimental Seismic Network). Retrieved from October 10, 2018, from
  8. INGV (Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia). Retrieved from October 10, 2018, from
  9. ITACA (ITalian ACcelerometric Archive) version 2.0. Retrieved from October 10, 2018, from
  10. Lagomarsino, S. (2012). Damage assessment of churches after L’Aquila earthquake (2009). Bull Earthquake Eng, 10, 73–92. Scholar
  11. Özmen, C., & Ünay, A. I. (2007). Commonly encountered seismic design faults due to the architectural design of residential buildings in Turkey. Building and Environment, 24(3), 1406–1416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Picuno, P. (2012). Vernacular farm buildings in landscape planning: a typological analysis in a southern Italian region. Journal of Agricultural Engineering, XLIII, e20, 130–137.Google Scholar
  13. Secchi, P. (Ed.). (1999). Proceedings of alerts and lessons learned: an effective way to prevent failures and problems. Technical Report WPP-167. Noordwijk, The Netherlands: ESTECS.Google Scholar
  14. Sorrentino, L., Liberatore, L., Liberatore, D., & Masiani, R. (2014). The behaviour of vernacular buildings in the 2012 Emilia earthquakes. Bull Earthquake Eng., 12, 2367–2382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Bovo
    • 1
    Email author
  • A. Barbaresi
    • 1
  • D. Torreggiani
    • 1
  • P. Tassinari
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Agricultural and Food SciencesUniversity of BolognaBolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations