Advertisement

A Methodology to Support Planning and Design of Suburban Agricultural Areas

  • P. Russo
  • P. LanteriEmail author
  • A. D’Emilio
Conference paper
  • 28 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 67)

Abstract

The changed attitude of today’s society towards environmental protection requires a reconsideration of territorial resources management, according to models characterized by an improved sustainability. Specific attention should be pointed to the recovery and redevelopment of the suburban areas, where the residual agricultural areas can have a relevant function in any land protection actions. Indeed, maintaining the productive function can contribute to support the sale and consumption of farm-to-table agricultural products. On the other hand, the addition of new social and educational functions can help to strengthen the relationship between suburban areas and urban center. In this work some design criteria are defined, which allow the introduction of new activities in suburban areas in respect of the present activities and historical landscapes. Specifically, in a first phase, the requirements of the areas intended for specific activities are determined (agricultural, on the one hand, and fruition for free time and educational activities, on the other). Subsequently, the functional and technological compatibility between the two models (agricultural and fruition) is verified, in order to allow their coexistence and integration.

Keywords

Traditional agriculture Fruition Compatibility Parks Landscape project 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The activity presented in the paper is part of the research grant “University Research – Research Plan 2016/2018” by University of Catania.

References

  1. Carmona-Torres, C., Parra-López, C., Grootb, J. C. J., & Rossing, W. A. H. (2011). Collective action for multi-scale environmental management: Achieving landscape policy objectives through cooperation of local resource managers. Landscape and Urban Planning, 103(1), 24–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Erickson, D. L., Lovell, S. T., & Méndez, V. E. (2011). Landowner willingness to embed production agriculture and other land use options in residential areas of Chittenden County, VT. Landscape and Urban Planning, 103(2), 174–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ghio, F. (1999). Siti e paesaggi. Firenze: Alinea Editrice. ISBN-10: 888125347X.Google Scholar
  4. Leger, A., Oueslati, W., & Salanié, J. (2013). Public tendering and green procurement as potential drivers for sustainable urban development: Implications for landscape architecture and other urban design professions. Landscape and Urban Planning, 116, 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Paül, V., & McKenzie, F. H. (2013). Peri-urban farmland conservation and development of alternative food networks: Insights from a case-study area in metropolitan Barcelona (Catalonia, Spain). Land Use Policy, 30(1), 94–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Riguccio, L., Carullo, L., Russo, P., & Tomaselli, G. (2016). A landscape project for the coexistence of agriculture and nature: A proposal for the coastal area of a Natura 2000 site in Sicily (Italy). Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 47(2), 61–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Riguccio, L., Tomaselli, G., Carullo, L., Verde, D., & Russo, P. (2017). Identifying areas suitable for wine tourism through the use of multi-criteria and geographic information system: The method and its application in the countryside around Mount Etna (Sicily). Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 48(2), 88–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Riguccio, L., Tomaselli, G., Russo, P., & Falanga, C. (2015). Identification of “Typical Agricultural Districts” for the development of rural areas applied to Eastern Sicily. Land Use Policy, 44, 122–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ristić, D., Vukoičić, D., & Milinčić, M. (2019). Tourism and sustainable development of rural settlements in protected areas—Example NP Кopaonik (Serbia). Land Use Policy, 89, 104231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Russo, P., Tomaselli, G., & Pappalardo, G. (2014). Marginal periurban agricultural areas: A support method for landscape planning. Land Use Policy, 41, 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Zasada, I. (2011). Multifunctional peri-urban agriculture—A review of societal demands and the provision of goods and services by farming. Land Use Policy, 28(4), 639–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment (Di3A)Università degli Studi di CataniaCataniaItaly

Personalised recommendations