A Check of Water Drop Impact Effects on Surface Soil Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity

  • F. TodiscoEmail author
  • V. Bagarello
  • L. Vergni
  • A. Vinci
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 67)


The post-tillage dynamics of the surface soil saturated hydraulic conductivity, Ks, was studied at the Masse experimental station (central Italy, silty-clay-loam soil). A sequence of experiments was performed by rainfall simulation on two replicated micro-plots (width 1 m, length 0.92 m, slope 16%) established on bare soil. Each high-intensity rainfall simulation was preceded by a low-intensity wetting phase. The soil water content, w, was measured before wetting and both before and after simulation. Runoff was measured at 5 min intervals. The infiltration rate was calculated as the difference between rainfall intensity and runoff rate. Finally, Ks was assumed to be equal to the infiltration rate under the nearly steady conditions reached at the end of each simulation. The pre-wetting w values were quite low and they increased during wetting, reaching at the end of this phase a value that remained more or less stable during the simulation phase. Consequently, all changes of Ks were expected to be specifically attributable to mechanical modifications of the porous medium due to the raindrop impact. For each individual experiment, Ks decreased with cumulative rainfall energy, E, according to an exponential or power relationship, denoting that raindrop impact had a noticeable effect on Ks when it occurred on an initially tilled soil. The developed experimental methodology appears usable to determine raindrop impact effects on the surface soil Ks in highly controlled field conditions and it could be applied to develop Ks versus E relationships usable for numerically simulating surface soil hydrological processes.


Tillage Infiltration Rainfall simulation Rainfall kinetic energy 


  1. Assouline, S., & Mualem, Y. (2006). Runoff from heterogeneous small bare catchments during soil surface sealing. Water Resource Research., 42, W12405.Google Scholar
  2. Bagarello, V., Baiamonte, G., & Caia, C. (2019). Variability of near-surface saturated hydraulic conductivity for the clay soils of a small Sicilian basin. Geoderma, 340, 133–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhattacharyya, R., Prakash, V., Kundu, S., & Gupta, H. S. (2006). Effect of tillage and crop rotations on pore size distribution and soil hydraulic conductivity in sandy clay loam soil of the Indian Himalayas. Soil Tillage Research, 86, 129–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carter, M. R., & Kunelius, H. T. (1986). Comparison of tillage and direct drilling for Italian ryegrass on the properties of a fine sandy loam soil. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 66, 197–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chahinian, N., Moussa, R., Andrieux, P., & Voltz, M. (2006). Accounting for temporal variation in soil hydrological properties when simulating surface runoff on tilled plots. Journal of Hydrology, 326, 135–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coutadeur, C., Coquet, Y., & Roger-Estrade, J. (2002). Variation of hydraulic conductivity in a tilled soil. European Journal of Soil Science, 53, 619–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Haruna, S. I., Anderson, S. H., Nkongolo, N. V., & Zaibon, S. (2018). Soil hydraulic properties: Influence of tillage and cover crops. Pedosphere, 28(3), 430–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Heard, J. R., Kladivko, E. J., & Mannering, J. V. (1988). Soil macroporosity, hydraulic conductivity and air permeability of silty soils under long-term conservation tillage in Indiana. Soil Tillage Research, 11, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Joschko, M., Sochtig, W., & Larink, O. (1992). Functional relationship between earthworm burrows and soil water movement in column experiments. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 24, 1545–1547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. King, B. A., & Bjomeberg, D. L. (2012). Droplet kinetic energy of moving spray-plate center-pivot irrigation sprinklers. Transactions of the ASABE, 55(2), 505–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mualem, Y., Assouline, S., & Rohdenburg, H. (1990). Rainfall induced soil seal (A) A critical review of observations and models. CATENA, 17(2), 185–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ndiaye, B., Esteves, M., Vandervaere, J. P., Lapetite, J. M., & Vauclin, M. (2005). Effect of rainfall and tillage direction on the evolution of surface crusts, soil hydraulic properties and runoff generation for a sandy loam soil. Journal of Hydrology, 307, 294–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Todisco, F., Vergni, L., Mannocchi, F., & Bomba, C. (2012). Calibration of the soil loss measurement method at the Masse experimental station. CATENA, 91, 4–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Vergni, L., Todisco, F., & Vinci, A. (2018). Setup and calibration of the rainfall simulator of the Masse experimental station for soil erosion studies. CATENA, 167, 448–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Vinci, A., Todisco, F., & Mannocchi, F. (2016). Calibration of manual measurements of rills using Terrestrial Laser Scanning. CATENA, 140, 164–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. White, I., Sully, M. J., & Melville, M. D. (1989). Use and hydrological robustness of time-to-incipient-ponding. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 53, 1343–1346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Alimentari e Ambientali (DSA3)Università di PerugiaPerugiaItaly
  2. 2.Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Alimentari e Forestali (SAAF)Università di PalermoPalermoItaly

Personalised recommendations