Advertisement

From Digital Learning Resources to Adaptive Learning Objects: An Overview

  • Ufuoma Chima ApokiEmail author
  • Humam K. Majeed Al-Chalabi
  • Gloria Cerasela Crisan
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 1126)

Abstract

To successfully achieve the goal of providing global access to quality education, the Information and Communications Technology (ICT) sector has provided tremendous advances in virtual/online learning. One of such advances is the availability of digital learning resources. However, to successfully accommodate learner peculiarities and predispositions, traditional online learning is gradually being transformed from a one-size-fits-all paradigm towards personalised learning. This transformation requires that learning resources are treated not as static content, but dynamic entities, which are reusable, portable across different platforms, and ultimately adaptive to user needs. This article takes a review of how digital learning resources are modelled in adaptive hypermedia systems to achieve adaptive learning, and we highlight prospects of future work.

Keywords

Personalised learning Learning objects Adaptive learning systems E-learning Digital learning resources 

References

  1. 1.
    UNESCO Global Education Monitoring Report: Education for people and planet: Creating Sustainable Futures for All, Paris, France, p. 73 (2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    García-Valdez, J.M., Rodríguez-Díaz, A., Castañón-Puga, M., Cristóbal-Salas, A.: Adaptive learning objects. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence ICAI04, pp. 105–109 (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wright, J.: Getting Personal: the role of personalization in online learning. http://www.insticc.org/portal/NewsDetails/TabId/246/ArtMID/1130/ArticleID/794/Getting-Personal-The-role-of-personalization-in-online-learning.aspx. Accessed 03 Apr 2019
  4. 4.
    Tseng, S.-S., Su, J., Hwang, G.-J., Hwang, G.-H., Tsai, C.-C., Tsai, C.-J.: An object-oriented course framework for developing adaptive learning systems. Educ. Technol. Soc. 11, 171–191 (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Andaloussi, K.S., Capus, L., Berrada, I.: Adaptive educational hypermedia systems: current developments and challenges. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Big Data, Cloud and Applications - BDCA 2017, pp. 1–8. ACM Press, New York (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1145/3090354.3090448
  6. 6.
    Shute, V.J., Zapata-Rivera, D.: Adaptive educational systems. In: Durlach, P.J., Lesgold, A.M. (eds.) Adaptive Technologies for Training and Education, pp. 7–27. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139049580.004
  7. 7.
    Medina-Medina, N., Garcia-Cabrera, L., Torres-Carbonell, J.J., Parets-Llorca, J.: Evolution in adaptive hypermedia systems. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution - IWPSE 2002, p. 34. ACM Press, New York (2002).  https://doi.org/10.1145/512035.512044
  8. 8.
    Vandewaetere, M., Desmet, P., Clarebout, G.: The contribution of learner characteristics in the development of computer-based adaptive learning environments. Comput. Hum. Behav. 27, 118–130 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brusilovsky, P.: Adaptive hypermedia. User Model. User Adapt. Interact. 11, 87–110 (2001).  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011143116306CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brusilovsky, P.: Methods and techniques of adaptive hypermedia. User Model. User Adapt. Interact. 6, 87–129 (1996).  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00143964CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Henze, N., Nejdl, W.: Logically characterizing adaptive educational hypermedia systems. In: International Workshop on Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-based Systems (AH 2003), pp. 20–24 (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sampson, D., Karagiannidis, C., Kinshuk, C.: Personalised learning: educational, technological and standardisation perspective. Interact. Educ. Multimed. 4, 24–39 (2002)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Klašnja-Milićević, A., Vesin, B., Ivanović, M., Budimac, Z., Jain, L.C.: E-Learning Systems: Intelligent Techniques for Personalization. Springer, Switzerland (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41163-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ennouamani, S., Mahani, Z.: An overview of adaptive e-learning systems. In: 2017 Eighth International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Information Systems (ICICIS), pp. 342–347. IEEE (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1109/INTELCIS.2017.8260060
  15. 15.
    Reategui, E., Boff, E., Campbell, J.A.: Personalization in an interactive learning environment through a virtual character. Comput. Educ. 51, 530–544 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Beldagli, B., Adiguzel, T.: Illustrating an ideal adaptive e-learning: a conceptual framework. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2, 5755–5761 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Terzieva, T., Rahnev, A.: Basic stages in developing an adaptive e-learning scenario. Int. J. Innov. Sci. Eng. Technol. 5, 50–54 (2018)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vesin, B., Ivanović, M.: Modern educational tools. In: Proceedings of PRIM2004, 16th Conference on Applied Mathematics, Budva, Montenegro, pp. 293–302 (2004)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
  20. 20.
    Association of American Publishers: What Are Learning Resources?—AAP. https://publishers.org/our-markets/prek-12-learning/what-are-learning-resources
  21. 21.
    Norman, S., Porter, D.: Designing Learning Objects for Online Learning: A Topical, Start-Up Guide to Distance Education Practice and Delivery. Commonwealth of Learning, Vancouver, BC, Canada (2007)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wiley, D.A. (ed.): The Instructional Use of Learning Objects. Agency for Instructional Technology, Association for Educational Communications & Technology, Bloomington, Indiana (2002)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Barker, P.: What is IEEE Learning Object Metadata/IMS Learning Resource Metadata? Cetis Standards Briefings Series 1 (2005)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Learning Technology Standards Committee (IEEE): The Learning Object Metadata standard—IEEE Learning Technology Standards Committee. https://www.ieeeltsc.org/working-groups/wg12LOM/lomDescription
  25. 25.
    Pitkanen, S.H., Silander, P.: Criteria for pedagogical reusability of learning objects enabling adaptation and individualised learning processes, pp. 246–250 (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1109/icalt.2004.1357412
  26. 26.
    Singh, R.G., Bernard, M., Gardler, R.: Creating sharable learning objects from existing digital course content. In: Proceedings of the 2004 Workshop on Computer Architecture Education Held in Conjunction with the 31st International Symposium on Computer Architecture - WCAE 2004, p. 8. ACM Press, New York (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1145/1275571.1275582
  27. 27.
    IMS Global Learning Consortium. http://www.imsglobal.org/
  28. 28.
    ADL Initiative. https://www.adlnet.gov/
  29. 29.
    Ariadne Project EU—Foundation. https://www.ariadne-eu.org/
  30. 30.
    Miller, S.J.: Metadata for Digital Collections: A How-To-Do-It Manual, p. 56. ALA Neal-Schuman, Chicago (2011)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Learning object standard - EduTech Wiki. http://edutechwiki.unige.ch/en/Learning_object_standard
  32. 32.
    IMS Content Packaging - EduTech Wiki. http://edutechwiki.unige.ch/en/IMS_Content_Packaging
  33. 33.
    Guevara, C., Aguilar, J., González-Eras, A.: The model of adaptive learning objects for virtual environments instanced by the competencies. Adv. Sci. Technol. Eng. Syst. J. 2, 345–355 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.25046/aj020344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ciolacu, M., Beer, R.: Adaptive user interface for higher education based on web technology. In: 2016 IEEE 22nd International Symposium for Design and Technology in Electronic Packaging, SIITME 2016, pp. 300–303 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1109/SIITME.2016.7777299
  35. 35.
    Marković, S., Jovanović, Z., Jovanović, N., Jevremović, A., Popović, R.: Adaptive distance learning and testing system. Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ. 21, E2–E13 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.20510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Essalmi, F., Ayed, L.J.B., Jemni, M.: A multi-parameters personalization approach of learning scenarios. In: Seventh IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2007), pp. 90–91. IEEE (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2007.22
  37. 37.
    Essalmi, F., Ayed, L.J.B., Jemni, M., Kinshuk, Graf, S.: A fully personalization strategy of E-learning scenarios. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26, 581–591 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.12.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Thalmann, S.: Adaptation criteria for the personalised delivery of learning materials: a multi-stage empirical investigation. Australas. J. Educ. Technol. 30, 45–60 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Felder, R.M., Silverman, L.K.: Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Eng. Educ. 78(7), 674–681 (1988)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Honey, P., Mumford, A.: A manual of learning styles. In: Learning styles. Engineering Subject Centre. Peter Honey, Maidenhead (1986)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Rufer, R., Adams, R.H.: Adapting three-dimensional-virtual world to reach diverse learners in an MBA program. In: Handbook of Research on Practices and Outcomes in Virtual Worlds and Environments, pp. 606–619 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-762-3.ch033
  42. 42.
    Keller, J.M.: Development and use of the ARCS model of motivational design. J. Instr. Dev. 10, 2–10 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ennouamani, S., Mahani, Z.: Designing a practical learner model for adaptive and context- aware mobile learning systems. IJCSNS Int. J. Comput. Sci. Netw. Secur. 18, 84–93 (2018)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ennouamani, S., Akharraz, L., Mahani, Z.: Integrating ICT in education: an adaptive learning system based on users’ context in mobile environments. In: Farhaoui, Y., Moussaid, L. (eds.) ICBDSDE 2018. SBD, vol. 53, pp. 15–19. Springer, Cham (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12048-1_3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Klašnja-Milićević, A., Vesin, B., Ivanović, M., Budimac, Z.: E-Learning personalization based on hybrid recommendation strategy and learning style identification. Comput. Educ. 56, 885–899 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.11.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Veletsianos, G., Russell, G.S.: Pedagogical agents. In: Spector, J.M., Merrill, M.D., Elen, J., Bishop, M.J. (eds.) Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, pp. 759–769. Springer, New York (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Battou, A., El Mezouary, A., Cherkaoui, C., Mammass, D.: Towards an adaptive learning system based on a new learning object granularity approach. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 2, 8–14 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2011.020902 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Wan, S., Niu, Z.: Adaptive learning objects assembly with compound constraints. In: 2014 IEEE Computers, Communications and IT Applications Conference, pp. 34–39. IEEE (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1109/ComComAp.2014.7017166
  49. 49.
    Hammami, S., Mathkour, H.: Adaptive e-learning system based on agents and object Petri nets (AELS-A/OPN). Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ. 23, 170–190 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.21587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Hayes-Roth, B.: A blackboard architecture for control. Artif. Intell. 26, 251–321 (1985).  https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(85)90063-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Bousalem, Z., El Guabassi, I., Cherti, I.: Toward adaptive and reusable learning content using XML dynamic labeling schemes and relational databases. In: Ezziyyani, M. (ed.) AI2SD 2018. AISC, vol. 915, pp. 787–799. Springer, Cham (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11928-7_71CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ufuoma Chima Apoki
    • 1
    Email author
  • Humam K. Majeed Al-Chalabi
    • 2
  • Gloria Cerasela Crisan
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Faculty of Computer ScienceAlexandru Ioan Cuza UniversityIasiRomania
  2. 2.Faculty of Automatics, Computer Science and ElectronicsUniversity of CraiovaCraiovaRomania
  3. 3.Faculty of SciencesVasile Alecsandri University of BacauBacauRomania

Personalised recommendations