Clustering Analysis to Profile Customers’ Behaviour in POWER CLOUD Energy Community

  • Lorella GabrieleEmail author
  • Francesca Bertacchini
  • Simona Giglio
  • Daniele Menniti
  • Pietro Pantano
  • Anna Pinnarelli
  • Nicola Sorrentino
  • Eleonora Bilotta
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11973)


This paper presents a cluster analysis study on energy consumption dataset to profile “groups of customers” to whom address POWERCLOUD services. POWER CLOUD project (PON I& C2014–2020) aims to create an energy community where each consumer can become also energy producer (PROSUMER) and so exchange a surplus of energy produced by renewable sources with other users, or collectively purchase or sell wholesale energy. In this framework, an online questionnaire has been developed in order to collect data on consumers behaviour and their preferences. A clustering analysis was carried on the filled questionnaires using Wolfram Mathematica software, in particular FindClusters function, to automatically group related segments of data. In our work, clustering analysis allowed to better understand the energy consumption propensity according the identified demographic variables. Thus, the outcomes highlight how the availability to adopt technologies to be used in PowerCloud energy community, increases with the growth of the family unit and, a greater propensity is major present in the age groups of 18–24 and 25–34.


Machine learning Cluster analysis Consumer behaviour 



This research was supported by the following grants POWERCLOUD (PON I&C2014-2020-MISE F/050159/01-03/X32).


  1. 1.
    Yu, X., Xue, Y.: Smart grids: a cyber-physical systems perspective. Proc. IEEE 104(5), 1058–1070 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dada, J.O.: Towards understanding the benefits and challenges of Smart/Micro-Grid for electricity supply system in Nigeria. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 38, 1003–1014 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13(3), 319–340 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Park, C.K., Kim, H.J., Kim, Y.S.: A study of factors enhancing smart grid consumer engagement. Energy Policy 72, 211–218 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mutanen, A., Ruska, M., Repo, S., Jarventausta, P.: Customer classification and load profiling method for distribution systems. IEEE Trans. Power Delivery 26(3), 1755–1763 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Li, W.T., et al.: Demand response management for residential smart grid: from theory to practice. IEEE Access 3, 2431–2440 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tu, C., He, X., Shuai, Z., Jiang, F.: Big data issues in smart grid-a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 79, 1099–1107 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhou, K., Fu, C., Yang, S.: Big data driven smart energy management: from big data to big insights. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 56, 215–225 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang, K., et al.: Wireless big data computing in smart grid. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 24(2), 58–64 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Strüker, J., Dinther, C.: Demand response in smart grids: research opportunities for the IS discipline. In: Proceedings of the Eighteenth Americas Conference on Information Systems, Seattle, Washington, 9–12 August, pp. 1–10 (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chen, H.H., Chen, S., Lan, Y.: Attaining a sustainable competitive advantage in the smart grid industry of China using suitable open innovation intermediaries. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 62, 1083–1091 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chicco, G.: Overview and performance assessment of the clustering methods for electrical load pattern grouping. Energy 42(1), 68–80 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zotos, K.: Performance comparison of Maple and Mathematica. Appl. Math. Comput. 188(2), 1426–1429 (2007)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Alfano, I., Carini, M., Gabriele, L.: Building SCIENAR, a virtual community of artists and scientists: usability testing for the system improvement. In: Lazakidou, A. (ed.) Virtual Communities, Social Networks and Collaboration, pp. 147–161. Springer, New York (2012). Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bilotta, E., Di Blasi, G., Stranges, F., Pantano, P.: A gallery of Chua attractors: Part VI. Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos 17(06), 1801–1910 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bilotta, E., Stranges, F., Pantano, P.: A gallery of Chua attractors: Part III. Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos 17(3), 657–734 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bilotta, E., Di Blasi, G., Stranges, F., Pantano, P.: A gallery of Chua attractors: Part IV. Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos 17(04), 1017–1077 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bilotta, E., Bossio, E., Pantano, P.: Chaos at school: Chua’s circuit for students in junior and senior High School. Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos 20(01), 1–28 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bilotta, E., Pantano, P., Vena, S.: Artificial micro-worlds part I: a new approach for studying life-like phenomena. Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos 21(2), 373–398 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bilotta, E., Pantano, P.: Artificial micro-worlds part II: cellular automata growth dynamics. Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos 21(03), 619–645 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bertacchini, F., Bilotta, E., Carini, M., Gabriele, L., Pantano, P., Tavernise, A.: Learning in the smart city: a virtual and augmented museum devoted to chaos theory. In: Chiu, D.K.W., Wang, M., Popescu, E., Li, Q., Lau, R. (eds.) ICWL 2012. LNCS, vol. 7697, pp. 261–270. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bertacchini, F., Bilotta, E., Gabriele, L., Pantano, P., Tavernise, A.: Toward the use of Chua’s circuit in education, art and interdisciplinary research: some implementation and opportunities. Leonardo 46(5), 456–463 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Abdechiri, M., Faez, K., Amindavar, H., Bilotta, E.: The chaotic dynamics of high-dimensional systems. Nonlinear Dyn. 87(4), 2597–2610 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Abdechiri, M., Faez, K., Amindavar, H., Bilotta, E.: Chaotic target representation for robust object tracking. Sig. Process. Image Commun. 54, 23–35 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bertacchini, F., Bilotta, E., Caldarola, F., Pantano, P.: The role of computer simulations in learning analytic mechanics towards chaos theory: a course experimentation. Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol. 50(1), 100–120 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Giglio, S., Bertacchini, F., Bilotta, E., Pantano, P.: Using social media to identify tourism attractiveness in six Italian cities. Tour. Manag. 72, 306–312 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Firouznia, M., Faez, K., Amindavar, H., Koupaei, J.A., Pantano, P., Bilotta, E.: Multi-step prediction method for robust object tracking. Digit. Signal Proc. 70, 94–104 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Adamo, A., Bertacchini, P.A., Bilotta, E., Pantano, P., Tavernise, A.: Connecting art and science for education: learning through an advanced virtual theater with “talking heads”. Leonardo 43(5), 442–448 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bertacchini, F., Bilotta, E., Gabriele, L., Pantano, P., Servidio, R.: Using Lego MindStorms in higher education: cognitive strategies in programming a quadruped robot. In: Workshop Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computers in Education, pp. 366–371 (2010)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bertacchini, F., et al.: An emotional learning environment for subjects with Autism Spectrum Disorder. In: International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL), pp. 653–659. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bertacchini, F., Tavernise, A.: Knowledge sharing for cultural heritage 2.0: prosumers in a digital agora. Int. J. Virtual Commun. Soc. Netw. 6(2), 24–36 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Vaca-Cárdenas, L.A., et al.: Coding with scratch: the design of an educational setting for elementary pre-service teachers. In: International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL), pp. 1171–1177. IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gabriele, L., Marocco, D., Bertacchini, F., Pantano, P., Bilotta, E.: An educational robotics lab to investigate cognitive strategies and to foster learning in an arts and humanities course degree. Int. J. Online Eng. (iJOE) 13(04), 7–19 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bertacchini, F., Bilotta, E., Lombardo, M.C., Sammartino, M., Pantano, P.: Brain-like large-scale cognitive networks and dynamics. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 227(7–9), 787–797 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gabriele, L., Bertacchini, F., Tavernise, A., Vaca-Cárdenas, L., Pantano, P., Bilotta, E.: Lesson planning by computational thinking skills in Italian pre-service teachers. Inf. Educ. 18(1), 69–104 (2019). Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zhou, L., Pan, S., Wang, J., Vasilakos, A.V.: Machine learning on big data: opportunities and challenges. Neurocomputing 237, 350–361 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Love, B.C.: Comparing supervised and unsupervised category learning. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 9(4), 829–835 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bertacchini, F., Bilotta, E., Pantano, P.: Shopping with a robotic companion. Comput. Hum. Behav. 77, 382–395 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Duque, J., Patino, J., Betancourt, A.: Exploring the potential of machine learning for automatic slum identification from VHR imagery. Remote Sens. 9(9), 895 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Tanwar, A.K., Crisostomi, E., Ferraro, P., Raugi, M., Tucci, M., Giunta, G.: Clustering analysis of the electrical load in European countries. In: 2015 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), pp. 1–8. IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Benítez, I., Quijano, A., Díez, J.L., Delgado, I.: Dynamic clustering segmentation applied to load profiles of energy consumption from Spanish customers. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 55, 437–448 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Antoniadis, A., Brossat, X., Cugliari, J., Poggi, J.M.: Clustering functional data using wavelets. Int. J. Wavelets Multiresolut. Inf. Process. 11(01), 1350003 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Raju, S., Chandrasekaran, M.: Performance analysis of efficient data distribution in P2P environment using hybrid clustering techniques. Soft Comput. 23(19), 9253–9263 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Nerurkar, P., Shirke, A., Chandane, M., Bhirud, S.: Empirical analysis of data clustering algorithms. Procedia Comput. Sci. 125, 770–779 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wolfram, S.: An elementary introduction to the Wolfram Language. Wolfram Media, Incorporated (2017)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Nielsen, J., Tahir, M.: Homepage Usability: 50 Websites Deconstructed. New Riders Publishing, Thousand Oaks (2001)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Nielsen, J.: Designing Web Usability. Verlag: Markt+Technik Verlag; Adresse: München (2001)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Frank, A.G., Dalenogare, L.S., Ayala, N.F.: Industry 4.0 technologies: implementation patterns in manufacturing companies. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 210, 15–26 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Jain, A.K., Murty, M.N., Flynn, P.J.: Data clustering: a review. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 31(3), 264–323 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of CalabriaArcavacata di RendeItaly

Personalised recommendations