Advertisement

Introduction of Two Analytical Theories as Applied to Developable Surfaces

  • Marina RynkovskayaEmail author
Chapter
  • 58 Downloads
Part of the Advanced Structured Materials book series (STRUCTMAT, volume 124)

Abstract

In this paper, two analytical shell theories of linear elasticity which were suggested by Goldenweiser (Theory of elastic thin shells (1953) [2]) and Krivoshapko (Appl Mech Rev 51(12):731–746 (1998) [5]) are analyzed and applied to developable surfaces. The problem is discussed in an arbitrary system of curvilinear coordinates. It is shown in the paper that both theories are applicable for developable surfaces but can give different results for other types of surfaces. The particular differences in terms and determinations of two analytical theories are shown and discussed, and the limits of the technical theory are presented. Developable helicoid has been chosen as a test surface in order to investigate the differences in two theories. There are also some recommendations for the application of each of the theory to different types of surfaces.

Keywords

Analytical theories Developable surface Developable helicoid Stress-strain analysis Analytical method 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The reported study was funded by DAAD Michael Lomonosov program.

References

  1. 1.
    Altenbach, H., Eremeyev, V., Morozov, N.: On equations of the linear theory of shells with surface stresses taken into account. Mech. Solids 45(3), 331–342 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Goldenweiser, A.L.: Theory of Elastic Thin Shells. Nauka, Moscow (1953)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gotman, A.S.: Use of developable surfaces for designing well-stream shapes. Oceanic Eng. Int. 9(2), 81–96 (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Konovalov, A.N.: Numerical methods in static problems of theory of elasticity. Siberian Math. J. 36(3), 491–505 (1995)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Krivoshapko, S.N.: Static analysis of shells with developable middle surfaces. Appl. Mech. Rev. 51(12), 731–746 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Krivoshapko, S.N.: Two types of governing equations for shells with the middle surfaces given in arbitrary curvilinear coordinates. Struct. Mech. Eng. Constr. Build. 1, 15–22 (2017)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Krivoshapko, S.N., Ivanov, V.N.: Encyclopedia of Analytical Surfaces. Springer (2015)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Krivoshapko, S.N., Rynkovskaya, M.: Five types of ruled helical surfaces for helical conveyers, support anchors and screws. MATEC Web Conf. 95, 06002 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liua, Y.J., Tangb, K., Gongc, W.Y., Wuc, T.R.: Industrial design using interpolatory discrete developable surfaces. Comp. Des. 43(9), 1089–1098 (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mamieva, I.A.: Influence of the geometrical researches of ruled surfaces on design of unique structures. Struct. Mech. Eng. Constr. Build. 15(4), 299–307 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Oetter, R., Barry, C.D., Duffty, B., Welter, J.: Block construction of small ships and boats through use of developable panels. J. Ship Prod. 18(2), 65–72 (2002)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shevelev, L.P., Isaev, B.V.: Non-linear equations of a theory of thin shells given in arbitrary coordinates. VTUZ, Leningrad (1988)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Solomon, J., Vouga, E., Wardetzky, M., Grinspun, E.: Flexible developable surfaces. Comp. Graph. Forum. 31(5), 1567–1576 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhilin, P.A.: Applied mechanics. Foundations of shells theory. Politechn Univ, Saint-Petersburg (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringPeoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)MoscowRussian Federation

Personalised recommendations