Advertisement

The Art Market Facing New Connoisseurship: The Reception of Pieter Brueghel the Younger at Auction

  • Anne-Sophie RadermeckerEmail author
Chapter
  • 15 Downloads
Part of the Sociology of the Arts book series (SOA)

Abstract

This chapter examines the relationships between art scholarship and the art market by focusing on the effects of recent scientific advances on the economic value of old masters. The renewed interest in copies these past decades has indeed mitigated the importance of the master’s name which, nonetheless, remains a significant pricing determinant that affects the perception and consumption of the arts. Based on Pieter II Brueghel’s sale, both auction house’s discourse and the buyers’ willingness to pay for autograph and non-autograph paintings are considered to see whether this market segment has emancipated from the quest for authorship. Empirical evidence shows that auction houses still focus on the artist’s name above all, and nurture an outdated vision of art that is no longer supported by scholars.

References

  1. Ainsworth, Maryan. 2005. From Connoisseurship to Technical Art History. The Getty Conservation Institute Newsletter 20 (1): 4–10.Google Scholar
  2. ———. 2017. Workshop Practice in Early Netherlandish Painting: Case Studies from Van Eyck Through Gossart. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
  3. Alpers, Svetlana. 1988. Rembrandt’s Enterprise: The Studio and the Market. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bandle, Anne-Laure. 2016. The Sales of Misattributed Works at Auction. Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boll, Dirk. 2011. Art For Sale. A Candid View of the Art Market. 2nd ed. Ostfildern: Hatje Cantz Verlag.Google Scholar
  6. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1992. Les Règles de l’art. Genèse et structures du champ littéraire. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  7. ———. 1994. Raisons pratiques, Sur la théorie de l’action. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  8. Brainerd, Andrew W. 2007. On Connoisseurship and Reason in the Authentication of Art. Chicago: Prologue Press.Google Scholar
  9. Charpentier, Isabelle, ed. 2006. Comment sont reçues les œuvres. Actualités des recherches en sociologie de la réception et des publics. Grane: Créaphis.Google Scholar
  10. Currie, Christina, and Dominique Allart. 2012. The Brueg(H)el Phenomenon: Paintings by Pieter Bruegel the Elder and Pieter Brueghel the Younger with a Special Focus on Technique and Copying Practice. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
  11. Ertz, Klaus. 1998/2000. Pieter Brueghel der Jüngere (1564–1637/38). Die Gemälde mit kritischem Oeuvrekatalog. Lingen: Luca Verlag.Google Scholar
  12. Faries, Molly, ed. 2006. Making and Marketing: Studies of the Painting Process in Fifteenth-and Sixteeth-Century Netherlandish Workshops. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
  13. Fehr, Ernst, and Karla Hoff. 2011. Tastes, Castes and Culture: The Influence of Society on Preferences. The Economic Journal 21: 396–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fincham, Derek. 2017. Authenticating Art by Valuing Experts. Mississippi Law Journal 86: 567–626.Google Scholar
  15. Fitchett, James, and Robert Caruana. 2015. Exploring the Role of Discourse in Marketing and Consumer Research: Role of Discourse in Marketing and Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Behaviour 14: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Frey, Bruno. 2003. Arts & Economics: Analysis & Cultural Policy. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Friedländer, Max J. 1942. On Art and Connoisseurship. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  18. Garric, Nathalie, and Isabelle Léglise. 2012. Analyser le discours d’expert et d’expertise. Berne: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  19. Gombert, Florence, and Didier Martens, eds. 2007. Le Maître au Feuillage brodé. Démarches d’artistes et méthodes d’attribution d’oeuvres à un peintre anonyme des anciens Pays-Bas du XVe siècle. Deauville: Librairie des Musées.Google Scholar
  20. Grampp, William. 1989. Pricing the Priceless: Art, Artists, and Economics. London: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  21. Grasman, Edward. 1999. The Rembrandt Research Project: Reculer Pour Mieux Sauter. Oud Holland 113 (3): 153–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Guichard, Charlotte. 2010. Du ‘nouveau connoisseurship’ à l’histoire de l’art Original et autographie en peinture. Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales 65 (6): 1387–1401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hatt, Michael, and Charlotte Klonk. 2006. Art History: A Critical Introduction to Its Methods. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Henderiks, Valentine. 2016. L’anonymat dans la peinture flamande du XVe siècle. Des maîtres aux noms d’emprunt aux collaborateurs d’atelier. In L’anonymat dans les arts et les lettres au Moyen Âge, ed. Sébastien Douchet and Valérie Naudet, 95–105. Provence: Presses de l’Université de Provence.Google Scholar
  25. Hope, Alexander. 2005. The Nature of Supply and Demand in the Old Master Picture Market. In Understanding International Art Markets and Management, ed. Iain Robertson, 195–213. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Jahn, Johannes. 1943. Wörterbuch der Kunst. Stuttgart: Kroener.Google Scholar
  27. Keen, Géraldine. 1971. The Sale of Works of Art. A Study Based on the Times-Sotheby’s Index. Norwich: Jarrold and Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
  28. Khaire, Mukti, and Daniel Wadhwani. 2010. Changing Landscapes: The Construction of Meaning and Value in a New Market Category – Modern Indian Art. Academy of Management Journal 53 (6): 1281–1304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lancaster, Kevin. 1966. A New Approach to Consumer Theory. Journal of Political Economy 74: 132–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Leeflang, Micha. 2004/05. Workshop Practices in Early Sixteenth-Century Antwerp studios. Jaarboek Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Antwerpen: 232–273.Google Scholar
  31. Liedtke, Walter. 2004. Rembrandt’s ‘Workshop’ Revisited. Oud Holland 117 (1/2): 48–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lyna, Dries. 2012. Name Hunting, Visual Characteristics and ‘New Old Masters’: Tracking the Taste for Paintings at 18th Century Auctions. Eighteenth Century Studies 46 (1): 57–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lyna, Dries, and Filip Vermeylen. 2009. Rubens for Sales. Art Auctions in Antwerp during the 17th–18th Centuries. In Art Auctions and Dealers: The Dissemination of Netherlandish Art During the Ancien Régime, ed. Dries Lyna, Filip Vermeylen, and Hans Vlieghe, 142–146. Turnhout: Brepols.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McAndrew, Clare. 2016. TEFAF Art Market Report 2015. Maastricht.Google Scholar
  35. Milgrom, Paul, and Robert Webber. 1982. The Value of Information in A Sealed-Bid Auction. Journal of Mathematical Economics 10 (1): 105–114.Google Scholar
  36. Monte, Michèle, and Claire Oger. 2015. La Construction de l’autorité en contexte. L’effacement du dissensus dans les discours institutionnels. In Discours d’autorité: des discours sans éclat(s)?, ed. Michèle Monte and Claire Oger, Mots. Les langages du politique 1 (7): 5–18.Google Scholar
  37. Moulin, Raymonde. 1992. L’artiste, l’institution et le marché. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
  38. Moulin, Raymonde, and Alain Quemin. 1993. La certification de la valeur de l’art. Experts et expertises. Annales, Économies, Sociétés et Civilisations 6: 1421–1445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. O’Connor, Francis V. 2004. Authenticating the Attribution of Art: Connoisseurship and the Law of Judging of Forgeries, Copies, and False Attributions. In The Expert versus the Object: Judging Fakes and False Attributions in the Visual Arts, ed. Ronald D. Spencer, 3–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Onofri, Laura. 2009. Old Master Paintings, Export Veto and Price Formation: An empirical Study. European Journal of Law and Economics 28: 149–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Reitlinger, Gerald. 1961. The Economics of Taste, Vol. 1: The Rise and Fall of the Picture Market. London: Barrie & Rockcliff.Google Scholar
  42. Renneboog, Luc, and Christophe Spaenjers. 2013. Buying Beauty: on Prices and Returns in the Art Market. Management Science 59: 36–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Seeman, Melvin. December 1959. On the Meaning of Alienation. American Sociological Review 24 (6): 783–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Smith, Charles W. 1989. Auctions: The Social Construction of Value. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  45. Talley, M. Kirby. 1989. Connoisseurship and the Methodology of the Rembrandt Research Project. International Journal of Museum Management and Curatorship 8 (2): 175–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Thompson, Craig J. 2004. Marketplace Mythology and Discourses of Power. Journal of Consumer Research 31 (1): 162–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tummers, Anna. 2011. The Eye of the Connoisseur: Authenticating Paintings by Rembrandt and His Contemporaries. Los Angeles: J. Paul Getty Museum.Google Scholar
  48. Tummers, Anna, and Koenraad Jonckheere. 2008. Art Market and Connoisseurhsip, A Closer Look at Paintings by Rembrandt, Rubens and Their Contemporaries. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Van de Wetering, Ernst. 1992. The Search for the Master’s Hand, an Anachronism? Berlin: 28th International Art History Congress.Google Scholar
  50. ———. 2008. Connoisseurship and Rembrandt’s Paintings: New Directions in the Rembrandt Research Project, Part II. The Burlington Magazine 150 (1259): 83–90.Google Scholar
  51. Velthuis, Olav. 2015. Globalization of the Art Market. Grove Art Online. [Online]. http://www.oxfordartonline.com.
  52. Wodak, Ruth, and Michal Krzyżanowski, eds. 2008. Qualitative Discourse Analysis in the Social Sciences. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  53. Wodak, Ruth, and Michael Meyer, eds. 2009. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. Introducing Qualitative Methods Series. London and Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  54. Wood, Christopher. 1997. The Great Art Boom, 1970–1997. Weybridge: Art Sales Index Ltd.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Université Libre de BruxellesBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations