Two Dimensional Opinion Dynamics of Real Opinion and Official Stance

  • Akira IshiiEmail author
  • Nozomi Okano
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Complexity book series (SPCOM)


Multi-dimensional opinion dynamics including both trust and distrust between people is presented. Opinion dynamics of two dimensions is applied to real opinion and official stance of people, agents and governments. As examples of the application of the two-dimensional opinion dynamics, we present the case of “Romeo and Juliet” and the conflict of two countries. Analyzing the movement in society, including the difference between the real opinion and the official stance gives us great freedom to the analysis.


Opinion dynamics Official stance Real opinion 



This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP19K04881. The authors thank for the meaningful discussion on the two dimension opinion dynamics of official stance and real opinion with Prof. H.Yamamoto of Rissho University and Prof. H. Takikawa of Tohoku University.


  1. 1.
    Deffuant, G., Neau, D., Amblard, F., Weisbuch, G.: Mixing beliefs among interacting agents. Adv. Complex Syst. 3, 87–98 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Weisbuch, G., Deffuant, G., Amblard, F., Nadal, J.P.: Meet, discuss and segregate! Complexity 7(3), 55–63 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hegselmann, R., Krause, U.: Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence models, analysis, and simulation. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 5 (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Castellano, C., Fortunato, S., Loreto, V: Statistical physics of social dynamics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 591 (2009)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sîrbu A., Loreto V., Servedio V.D.P., Tria F.: Opinion dynamics: models, extensions and external effects. In: Loreto, V., et al. (eds.) Participatory Sensing, Opinions and Collective Awareness. Understanding Complex Systems, p. 42. Springer, Cham (2017)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ishii, A., Kawahata, Y.: Opinion dynamics theory for analysis of consensus formation and division of opinion on the internet. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Asia Pacific Symposium on Intelligent and Evolutionary Systems (IES2018), pp. 71–76 (2018). arXiv: 1812.11845 [physics.soc-ph]Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ishii, A.: Opinion dynamics theory considering trust and suspicion in human relations. In: Morais D., Carreras A., de Almeida A., Vetschera R. (eds.) Group Decision and Negotiation: Behavior, Models, and Support, GDN 2019. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol. 351. Springer, Cham (2019)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ishii, A., Kawahata, Y.: Opinion dynamics theory considering interpersonal relationship of trust and distrust and media effects. In: The 33rd Annual Conference of the Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence, vol. 33 (2019)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kawahata, Y., Ishii, A.: Consensus formation online using sociophysics method. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Group Decision and Negotiation in 2019 a Joint GDN-EWG/BOR Meeting, GDN2019 (2019). arXiv: 1907.07946Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ishii, A., Kawahata, Y.: New Opinion dynamics theory considering interpersonal relationship of both trust and distrust. In: IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence Volume (2019)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Okano, N., Ishii, A.: Isolated, untrusted people in society and charismatic person using opinion dynamics. In: IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence-Companion Volume (2019)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Okano, N., Ishii, A.: Sociophysics approach of simulation of charismatic person and distrusted people in society using opinion dynamics. In: Proceedings of IES2019. Proceedings in Adaptation, Learning and Optimization (2019)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Asch, S.E.: Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. In: Groups, Leadership and Men; Research in Human Relations, pp. 177–190. Carnegie Press, Oxford (1951)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wang, S.W., Huang, C.Y., Sun, C.T.: Modeling self-perception agents in an opinion dynamics propagation society. Simulation 90(3), 238–248 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Huang, C.-Y., Wen, T.-H.: A novel private attitude and public opinion dynamics model for simulating pluralistic ignorance and minority influence. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 17(3), 8 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ye, M., Qin, Y., Govaert, A., Anderson, B.D., Cao, M.: An influence network model to study discrepancies in expressed and private opinions. Automatica 107(7), 371–381 (2019)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    León-Medina, F.J., Tena-Sànchez, J.M., Miguel, F.J.: Fakers becoming believers: how opinion dynamics are shaped by preference falsification, impression management and coherence heuristics. Qual. Quant. (2019) Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ishii, A., Arakaki, H., Matsuda, N., Umemura, S., Urushidani, T., Yamagata, N., Yoshida, N.: The ‘hit’ phenomenon: a mathematical model of human dynamics interactions as s stochastic process. New J. Phys. 14, 063018 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Levenson, J.L. (ed.): Romeo and Juliet. The Oxford Shakespeare. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2000). ISBN: 0-19-281496-6Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Strogatz, S.H.: Love affairs and differential equations. Math. Mag. 61, 35 (1988)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Strogatz, S.H.: Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos. With Applications to Physics, Biology, Chemistry, and Engineering. Springer, Berlin (1994)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wauer, J., Schwarzer, D., Cai, G.Q., Lin, Y.K.: Dynamical models of love with time-varying fluctuations. Appl. Math. Comput. 188, 1535–1548 (2007)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Axelrod, R., Bennett, D.S.: A landscape theory of aggregation. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 23, 211–233 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Galam S.: Spontaneous coalition forming. Why some are stable? In: Bandini S., Chopard B., Tomassini M. (eds.) Cellular Automata. ACRI 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2493. Springer, Berlin (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tottori UniversityTottoriJapan

Personalised recommendations