Advertisement

A Political Economy of Regulatory Policy: The Case of ‘Illegal’ Small-Scale Mining in Ghana

  • Alex Osei-Kojo
  • Nathan AndrewsEmail author
Chapter
  • 19 Downloads
Part of the Palgrave Handbooks in IPE book series (PHIPE)

Abstract

Drawing on insights from political economy, this chapter seeks to answer two interrelated questions: How do we explain the rational and strategic behaviors of miners and elected officials in Ghana’s small-scale mining sector? And how do these behaviors perpetuate ‘illegal’ mining in Ghana? The main arguments are that elected officials act rationally by exhibiting a dominant strategy of non-cooperation, thereby failing to broker viable policy options to reduce ‘illegal’ mining. ‘Illegal’ miners act strategically by refusing to register because there are low incentives for doing so. Further, by exercising intelligence and creativity, miners adapt to government regulation by partnering with foreign (e.g., Chinese) nationals and threatening to vote against elected officials for reneging on their promise to regularize the practice. We propose that, rather than being non-cooperative, elected officials can broker binding agreements to cooperate in order to tackle illegal mining in Ghana.

References

  1. Abdulai, Abdul-Gafaru. 2017. The Galamsey Menace in Ghana: A Political Problem Requiring Political Solutions? Policy Brief No. 5. Accra: University of Ghana Business School.Google Scholar
  2. Andrews, Nathan. 2015. Digging for Survival and/or Justice? The Drivers of Illegal Mining Activities in Western Ghana. Africa Today 62 (2): 2–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aryee, Benjamin N.A., Bernard K. Ntibery, and Evans Atorkui. 2003. Trends in the Small-Scale Mining of Precious Minerals in Ghana: A Perspective in its Environmental Impact. Journal of Cleaner Production 11 (2): 131–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Axelrod, Robert. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  5. Banchirigah, Sadia M. 2008. How Have Reforms Fuelled the Expansion of Artisanal Mining? Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa. Resources Policy 31: 165–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bickers, Kenneth N., and John T. Williams. 2001. Public Policy Analysis: A Political Economy Approach. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
  7. de Mesquita, Ethan Bueno. 2016. Political Economy for Public Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hilson, Gavin. 2001. A Contextual Review of the Ghanaian Small-Scale Mining Industry. London: IIED.Google Scholar
  9. ———. 2009. Small-Scale Mining and Economic Development in Sub-Saharan Africa. An Overview. Resources Policy 34: 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. ———. 2017. Shootings and Burning Excavators: Some Rapid Reflections in the Government of Ghana Handling of the Informal Galamsey Mining ‘Menace’. Resources Policy 54: 109–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hilson, Gavin, and Clive Potter. 2005. Structural Adjustment and Subsistence Industry: Artisanal Gold Mining in Ghana. Development and Change 36 (1): 103–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hilson, Gavin, Abigail Hilson, and Eunice Adu-Darko. 2014. Chinese Participation in Ghana’s Informal Gold Mining Economy: Drivers, Implications and Clarification. Journal of Rural Studies 34: 292–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Horn, Murray John. 1995. The Political Economy of Public Administration. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED). 2015. Transforming Mining Through Dialogue. Accessed via: http://pubs.iied.org/G04081/. Accessed 2 May 2018.
  15. Labonne, Beatrice. 2014. Who Is Afraid of Artisanal and Small-Scale Mining (ASM)? The Extractive Industries and Society 1 (2): 121–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McQuilken, James, and Gavin Hilson. 2016. Artisanal and Small-Scale Gold Mining in Ghana: Evidence to Inform and Action Dialogue. London: International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED).Google Scholar
  17. Miller, Gary. 1992. Managerial Dilemmas: The Political Economy of Hierarchy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. North, Douglass C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Olson, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Osei-Kojo, Alex, and Nathan Andrews. 2016. Questioning the Status Quo: Can Stakeholder Participation Improve Implementation of Small-Scale Mining Laws? Resources 5 (4): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Osei-Kojo, Alex, Kwame Asamoah, and Emmanuel Yeboah-Assiamah. 2016. Implementing Small Scale Mining Laws in Ghana: Insights from the Prestea Huni Valley District. Administratio Publica 24 (3): 235–256.Google Scholar
  22. Ostrom, Elinor. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sabatier, Paul A., Susan Hunter, and Susan McLaughlin. 1987. The Devil Shit: Perceptions and Misperceptions of Opponents. Western Political Quarterly 40: 51–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shepsle, Kenneth A. 2010. The Rules of the Game: What Rules? Which Game. In prepared for the Conference on the Legacy and Work of Douglass C. North, St. Louis.Google Scholar
  25. Simon, Herbert A. 1957. Models of Man: Social and Rational. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  26. Teschner, Benjamin A. 2012. Small-Scale Mining Ghana: The Government and the Galamsey. Resources Policy 37 (3): 308–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Thaler, Richard H., and Cass R. Sunstein. 2009. Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth and Happiness. New York: Penguin Group.Google Scholar
  28. Tom-Dery, Damien, Justice Z. Dagben, and Samuel J. Cobbina. 2012. Effect of Illegal Small-Scale Mining Operations on Vegetation Cover of Arid Northern Ghana. Research Journal of Environmental and Earth Sciences 4 (6): 674–679.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Public AffairsUniversity of Colorado DenverDenverUSA
  2. 2.Department of Global & International StudiesUniversity of Northern British ColumbiaPrince GeorgeCanada

Personalised recommendations