Advertisement

An Epigenetic Pro-action for Moral Development

  • Giuseppe Turchi
Chapter
  • 34 Downloads

Abstract

In this chapter I will discuss some of the arguments proposed by Persson and Savulescu, J. Hughes and T. Douglas in favor of the moral bio-enhancement. I contend that serious problems concerning the citizen’s behavior follow from their picture. Most importantly, a bio-enhanced moral agent would paradoxically be deprived of her ability to formulate genuine moral reflexions, outside of her pre-established framework. In line with current studies of Darcia Narvaez and Kathinka Evers, I outline a pluralistic view within which neuroscientific data may help developing a more effective moral pedagogy both for theoretical and practical purposes.

References

  1. Callegaro MM (2005) The neurobiology of schema therapy and the unconscious processing. Revista Brasileira de Terapias Cognitivas 1(1):9–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Caprara GV, Barbaranelli C, Borgogni L (2000) BFQ: big five questionnaire. Manuale (seconda edizione). O.S. Organizzazioni Speciali, FirenzeGoogle Scholar
  3. Changeux JP, Courrège P, Danchin A (1973) A theory of the epigenesis of neuronal networks by selective stabilization of synapses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 70(10):2974–2978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Crockett MJ, Clark L, Tabibnia G, Lieberman MD, Robbins TW (2008) Serotonin modulates behavioral reactions to unfairness. Science 320:1379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. de Dreu C, Greer LL, Handgraaf MJ et al (2010) Neuropeptide oxytocin regulates parochial altruism in intergroup conflicts among humans. Science 328:1408–1411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Delgado J (1969) Physical control of the mind. Toward a psychocivilized society. Harper and Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Douglas T (2008) Moral enhancement. J Appl Philos 25(3):228–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Douglas T (2013) Moral enhancement via direct emotion manipulation: a reply to John Harris. Bioethics 27(3):160–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Douglas T (2018) Neural and environmental modulation of motivation: what’s the moral difference? In: Douglas T, Birks D (eds) Treatment for crime: philosophical essays on neurointerventions in criminal justice. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 208–223Google Scholar
  10. Evers K (2015a) Can we be epigenetically proactive? In: Metzinger T, Windt JM (eds) Open MIND, vol 13T. MIND Group, Frankfurt am Main. https://open-mind.net/papers/can-we-be-epigenetically-proactive. Accessed 19 Jan 2019Google Scholar
  11. Evers K (2015b) Understanding epigenetic proaction, a reply to Stephan Schleim. In: Metzinger T, Windt JM (eds) Open MIND, vol 13R. MIND Group, Frankfurt am Main. https://open-mind.net/papers/understanding-epigenetic-proaction. Accessed 19 Jan 2019Google Scholar
  12. Evers K, Changeux JP (2016) Proactive epigenesis and ethical innovation. A neuronal hypothesis for the genesis of ethical rules. EMBO Rep 17(10):1361–1364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harris J (2016) How to be good. The possibility of moral enhancement. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hauser MD (2006) Moral minds. How nature designed our universal sense of right and wrong. Ecco, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Hauskeller M (2016) The art of misunderstanding critics: the case of Ingmar Persson and Julian Savulescu’s defense of moral bioenhancement. Camb Q Healthcare Ethics 25(1):153–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hölzez BK, Carmody J, Congleton C et al (2011) Mindfulness practice leads to increases in regional brain gray matter density. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging 191:36–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hughes J (2006) Virtue engineering. Applications of neurotechnology to improve moral behavior. https://ieet.org/index.php/IEET2/more/hughes20071120. Accessed 19 Jan 2019
  18. Hughes J (2013) Using neurotechnologies to develop virtues: a Buddhist approach to cognitive enhancement. Account Res Policies Qual Assur 20(1):27–41Google Scholar
  19. Hursthouse R, Pettigrove G (2003) Virtue ethics. In: The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-virtue/. Accessed 19 Jan 2019
  20. Kabat-Zinn J (1990) Full catastrophe living: using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress, pain, and illness. Delta, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Kaufman J, Plotsky PM, Nemeroff CB, Charney DS (2000) Effects of early adverse experiences on brain structure and function: clinical implications. Biol Psychiatry 48:778–790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kennedy AE, Rubin KH, Hastings PD, Maisel B (2004) Longitudinal relations between child vagal-tone and parenting behavior: 2 to 4 years. Dev Psychobiol 45:10–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kosfeld M, Heinrichs M, Zak PJ, Fischbacher U, Fehr E (2005) Oxytocin increases trust in humans. Nature 435(2):673–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lazar SW, Bush G, Golb RL et al (2000) Functional brain mapping of the relaxation response and meditation. Neuroreport 11:1581–1585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Maclean PD (1990) The triune brain in evolution: role in paleocerebral functions. Plenum Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Mark VH, Ervin FR (1970) Violence and the brain. Harper & Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Mashour GA, Walker EE, Martuza RL (2005) Psychosurgery: past, present, and future. Brain Res Rev 48:409–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Narvaez D (2012) Moral neuroeducation from early life through the lifespan. Neuroethics 5:145–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Narvaez D (2014) Neurobiology and the development of human morality. Evolution, culture, and wisdom. Norton & Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Narvaez D (2016) Embodied morality. Protectionism, engagement and imagination. Palgrave Pivot, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Narvaez D, Mrkva K (2014) Creative moral imagination. In: Moran S, Cropley DH, Kaufman JC (eds) The ethics of creativity. Palgrave MacMillan, New York, pp 25–45Google Scholar
  32. Panksepp J (1998) Affective neuroscience: the foundations of human and animal emotions. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Panksepp J (2007) Can PLAY diminish ADHD and facilitate the construction of the social brain? J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 16:57–66Google Scholar
  34. Persson I, Savulescu J (2008) The perils of cognitive enhancement and the urgent imperative to enhance the moral character of humanity. J Appl Ethics 25:162–176Google Scholar
  35. Persson I, Savulescu J (2012) Unfit for the future. The need for moral enhancement. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Persson I, Savulescu J (2014) Response: should moral bioenhancement be compulsory? Reply to Vojin Rakic. J Med Ethics 40(4):251–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shook JR (2012) Neuroethics and the possible types of moral enhancement. AJOB Neurosci 4(3):3–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tse WS, Bond AJ (2002) Serotoninergic intervention affects both social dominance and affiliative behaviour. Psychopharmacology 161:324–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Turnbull CM (1983) The human cycle. Simon & Schuster, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. Wallace B, Cesarini D, Lichtenstein P, Johanesson M (2007) Heritability of ultimatum game responder behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104(40):15631–15634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wiseman H (2016) The myth of the moral brain: the limits of moral enhancement. The MIT Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Young JE, Klosko JS, Weishaar ME (2003) Schema therapy: a practitioner’s guide. Guilford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  43. Zatorre RJ, Douglas Field R, Johansen-Berg H (2012) Plasticity in gray and white: neuroimaging changes in brain structure during learning. Nat Neurosci 15(4):528–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giuseppe Turchi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Humanities, Social Sciences and Cultural IndustriesUniversity of ParmaParmaItaly

Personalised recommendations