Advertisement

Investigating variations in computer and information literacy and computational thinking

  • Julian FraillonEmail author
  • John Ainley
  • Wolfram Schulz
  • Tim Friedman
  • Daniel Duckworth
Open Access
Chapter
  • 12 Downloads

Abstract

Prior to the International Computer and Information Literacy Study (ICILS), research into learning outcomes related to information and computer technologies (ICT), and factors associated with student achievement in this area had generally been based on a few national studies. ICILS 2018 used multilevel models to assess the extent to which factors at the student and school level were associated with variations in computer and information literacy (CIL) and computational thinking (CT). It investigated access to, use of, and familiarity with ICT, school context factors, as well as variables reflecting the personal and social background of students. There were differences in the variance in both CIL and CT, as well as the proportion of variance between schools, across participating countries. Multilevel models explained much of the variance in CIL and CT at the school level but less variance within schools was explained. Personal and social background factors were shown to be associated with CIL and CT. Female students tended to have higher CIL scores than male students but lower CT scores than male students. The use of the test language at home was a positive predictor of CIL and CT in some countries. Both expected university education and socioeconomic background were consistent positive predictors of both CIL and CT across countries. There were mostly inconsistent effects across countries on CIL and CT by school-level factors related to ICT.

References

  1. ACARA. (2012). National Assessment Program—ICT literacy. Years 6 & 10 report. 2011. Sydney, Australia: Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. Retrieved from https://www.nap.edu.au/_resources/NAP_ICTL_2011_Public_Report_Final.pdf.
  2. ACARA. (2015). National Assessment Program —ICT literacy. Years 6 & 10 report. 2014. Sydney, Australia: Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. Retrieved from: http://www.nap.edu.au/_resources/D15_8761__NAP-ICT_2014_Public_Report_Final.pdf.
  3. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1975). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  4. Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., Schulz, W., Duckworth, D., & Friedman, T. (2019). IEA International Computer and Information Literacy Study 2018 assessment framework. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. Retrieved from https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783030193881.
  5. Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., Schulz, W., Friedman, T., & Gebhardt, E. (2014). Preparing for life in a digital age: The IEA International Computer and Information Literacy Study international report. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. Retrieved from https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783319142210.
  6. Fraillon, J., Schulz, W., Friedman, T., & Meyer, S. (Eds.). (2020). IEA International Computer and Information Literacy Study 2018 technical report. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
  7. Hatlevik, O.E. (2009). How to identify and understand digital literacy among 9th grade Norwegian students: Examining the influences from school and home on students’ digital literacy. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 4(3-4), 159–174.Google Scholar
  8. Hatlevik, O.E., & Christophersen, K.A. (2013). Digital competence at the beginning of upper secondary school: Identifying factors explaining digital inclusion. Computers & Education, 63(1), 240–247. Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.015.
  9. Hatlevik, O.E., Ottestad, G., & Throndsen, I. (2014). Predictors of digital competence in 7th grade: a multilevel analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31, 220–231.Google Scholar
  10. MCEECDYA [Ministerial Council for Education, Early Childhood Development and Youth Affairs]. (2010). National assessment program—ICT literacy. Years 6 & 10 report. 2008. Carlton South, Australia: Curriculum Corporation. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED534805.pdf.
  11. MCEETYA [Ministerial Council for Education, Early Childhood Development and Youth Affairs]. (2007). National assessment program—ICT literacy. Years 6 and 10 report. 2005. Carlton South, Australia: Curriculum Corporation. Retrieved from https://www.nap.edu.au/_resources/2005_ICTL_Public_Report_file_main.pdf.
  12. Muthén, L.K., & Muthén, B.O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide (seventh ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. Retrieved from https://www.statmodel.com/download/usersguide/Mplus/user/guide/Ver_7_r3_web.pdf.
  13. OECD. (2011). PISA 2009 results: Students on line. Digital technologies and performance (Volume VI). Paris, France: Author. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264112995-en.
  14. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
  15. Román, M., & Murrillo, J. (2013). Estimación del efecto escolar para la competencia digital. Aporte del liceo en el desarrollo de las habilidades TIC en estudiantes de secundaria en Chile [Investigation into the effect of school on digital competency. The contribution of the lyceum to the development of ICT in Chilean high school students]. In CEPPE, Desarrollo de habilidades digitales para el siglo XXI en Chile: ¿Qué dice el SIMCE TIC? [Developing digital skills for the twenty-first century in Chile: What does ICT SIMCE say?] (pp. 141–176). Santiago, Chile: LOM Ediciones.Google Scholar
  16. Rutkowski, D., & Delandshere, G. (2016). Causal inferences with large scale assessment data: Using a validity framework. Large-scale Assessments in Education, 4(6). Retrieved from https://largescaleassessmentsineducation.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40536-016-0019-1.
  17. San Martín, E., Claro, M., Cabello, T., & Preiss, D. (2013). Habilidades TICs para el aprendizaje y su relación con el conocimiento escolar en lenguaje y matemáticas [ICT skills for learning and their relationship to school knowledge in language and mathematics]. In CEPPE. Desarrollo de habilidades digitales para el siglo XXI en Chile: ¿Qué dice el SIMCE TIC? [Developing digital skills for the twenty-first century in Chile: What does ICT SIMCE say?] (pp. 229–248). Santiago, Chile: LOM Ediciones.Google Scholar
  18. US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2016). The nation’s report card: 2014 Technology & Engineering Literacy (TEL) report card at grade 8 (NCES2016119). Retrieved from https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/tel_2014/.

Copyright information

© IEA International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement 2020

Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julian Fraillon
    • 1
    Email author
  • John Ainley
    • 2
  • Wolfram Schulz
    • 3
  • Tim Friedman
    • 4
  • Daniel Duckworth
    • 5
  1. 1.The Australian Council for Educational ResearchCamberwellAustralia
  2. 2.The Australian Council for Educational ResearchCamberwellAustralia
  3. 3.The Australian Council for Educational ResearchCamberwellAustralia
  4. 4.The Australian Council for Educational ResearchCamberwellAustralia
  5. 5.The Australian Council for Educational ResearchCamberwellAustralia

Personalised recommendations