Advertisement

England: Autonomy and Regulation in the School System in England

  • Philip A. WoodsEmail author
  • Amanda Roberts
  • Joy Jarvis
  • Suzanne Culshaw
Chapter
  • 13 Downloads
Part of the Educational Governance Research book series (EGTU, volume 13)

Abstract

The chapter examines the school system in England, concentrating on developments since 2010. During this period, a radical refashioning of the school system in England has taken place as large numbers of schools have moved from being the responsibility of local authorities to becoming ‘independent’, though still state-funded, academies operating in the framework of and accountable to national authorities. The chapter explores the claimed institutional and professional autonomy integral to the idea of a self-improving school-led system influential in the national policy driving this change. Different ways of understanding autonomy are examined through notions of licensed, conditional, regulated, rational and ethical autonomy, contributing to a critical understanding of how the system is developing. The chapter highlights, inter alia, the importance of examining critically the distribution of autonomy across the various actors and institutions in the system. It also highlights the ethics of autonomy. The latter brings to the fore the moral demands entailed in autonomy and the importance and challenges of exercising principled autonomy and critical reflexivity as an integral feature of autonomous practice, especially in the context of pressures in the school system to conform to performative and competitive logics.

Keywords

Self-improving system School-led improvement Governance Academies Ethical autonomy 

References

  1. Academies Commission. (2013). Unleashing greatness: Getting the best from an academised system – The report of the academies commission. London: RSA/Pearson. Available at: https://www.thersa.org/discover/publications-and-articles/reports/unleashing-greatness-getting-the-best-from-an-academised-system
  2. Andrews, J., Perera, N., Eyles, et al. (2017). The impact of academies on educational outcomes. London: Education Policy Institute.Google Scholar
  3. Apple, M. W. (2007). Whose markets, whose knowledge? In A. R. Sadovnik (Ed.), Sociology of education. A critical reader. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Archer, M. (2012). The reflexive imperative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baggini, J. (2015). Freedom regained: The possibility of free will. London: Granta.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berry, J. (2016). Teachers undefeated: How global education reform has failed to crush the spirit of educators. London: UCL Institute of Education.Google Scholar
  7. Bolton, P. (2015). Converter academies: Statistics (Briefing Paper: Number 6233). London: House of Commons Library.Google Scholar
  8. Boyask, R. (2015). Nuanced understandings of privatization in local authorities’ services to schools. Management in Education, 29(1), 35–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brink, D. O. (2003). Perfectionism and the Common Good: Themes in the Philosophy of T. H. Green. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  10. Chapman, C. (2015). From one school to many: Reflections on the impact and nature of school federations and chains in England. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43(1), 46–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cirin, R. (2017). Academy trust survey 2017: Research report. London: DfE.Google Scholar
  12. Clegg, N., Allen, R., Fernades, S., Freedman, S., & Kinnock, S. (2017). Commission on inequality in education. London: Social Market Foundation.Google Scholar
  13. DfE. (2016a). Educational excellence everywhere. London: DfE.Google Scholar
  14. DfE. (2016b). DfE strategy 2015–2020 world-class education and care. London: DfE.Google Scholar
  15. Fielding, M., Bragg, S., Craig, J., Cunningham, I., Eraut, M., Gillinson, S., Horne, M., Robinson, C., & Thorp, J. (2005). Factors influencing the transfer of good practice. Nottingham: DfES Publications.Google Scholar
  16. Gorard, S. (2014). The link between Academies in England, pupil outcomes and local patterns of socio-economic segregation between schools. Research Papers in Education, 29(3), 268–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gorard, S. (2016). The complex determinants of school intake characteristics and segregation, England 1989 to 2014. Cambridge Journal of Education, 46(1), 131–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Greany, T., & Higham, R. (2018). Hierarchy, markets and networks: Analysing the ‘self-improving school-led system’ agenda in England and the implications for schools. London: UCL Institute of Education Press.Google Scholar
  19. Gu, Q., Rea, S., Smethem, L., Dunford, J., Varley, M., & Sammons, P. (2015). Teaching schools evaluation: Final report. Nottingham: National College for Teaching and Leadership.Google Scholar
  20. Hargreaves, D. H. (2010). Creating a self-improving system. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.Google Scholar
  21. Hargreaves, D. H. (2012). A self-improving school system: Towards maturity. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.Google Scholar
  22. Hargreaves, D. H. (2014). A self-improving school system and its potential for reducing inequality. Oxford Review of Education, 40(6), 696–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills. (2017). The annual report of her Majesty’s chief inspector of education, Children’s services and skills 2016/17. London: Ofsted.Google Scholar
  24. Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills. (2018). HMCI commentary: Curriculum and the new education inspection framework. Available at https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/hmci-commentary-curriculum-and-the-new-education-inspection-framework
  25. Hill, R. (2011). The importance of teaching and the role of system leadership: A commentary on the Illuminas research for the National College. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.Google Scholar
  26. Hill, V. (2014). The HertsCam TLDW programme. In D. Frost (Ed.), Transforming education through teacher leadership. Cambridge: Leadership for Learning/The Cambridge Network.Google Scholar
  27. House of Commons Education Committee. (2017). Multi-academy trusts (Seventh report of Session 2016–2017). London: House of Commons.Google Scholar
  28. Jeffrey, B., & Troman, G. (2012). The performative institutional embrace. Journal of Organizational Ethnography, 1(2), 195–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lumby, J., & Coleman, M. (2016). Leading for equality: Making schools fairer. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lundström, U. (2015). Teacher autonomy in the era of new public management. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 1, 73–85.Google Scholar
  31. Murphy, R. (1982). Power and autonomy in the sociology of education. Theory and Society, 11(2), 179–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. National Audit Office. (2018). Converting maintained schools to academies. London: National Audit Office.Google Scholar
  33. National College for Teaching and Leadership. (2017). Teaching school alliances: Key Information Form (KIF) 2015/16 – Analysis. London: Department for Education.Google Scholar
  34. O’Neill, O. (2003). Autonomy: The emperor’s new clothes. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 77(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. PricewaterhouseCoopers. (2008). Academies evaluation: Fifth annual report. London: Department for Children, Schools and Families.Google Scholar
  36. Reay, D. (2017). Miseducation: Inequality, education and the working classes. Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Roberts, N. (2017). FAQs: Academies and free schools (Briefing Paper: Number 07059). London: House of Commons Library.Google Scholar
  38. Roberts, N., & Abreu, L. (2018). School inspections in England: Ofsted (Briefing Paper: Number 07091). London: House of Commons Library.Google Scholar
  39. Solbrekke, T., & Sugrue, C. (2011). Professional responsibility – Back to the future. In C. Sugrue & T. Solbrekke (Eds.), Professional responsibility: New horizons of praxis (pp. 11–28). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Stacey, R. (2012). Tools and techniques of leadership and management: Meeting the challenge of complexity. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sutherland, T. (2017). Organisational strategies to multiply the teacher leadership effect. In D. Frost (Ed.), Empowering teachers as agents of change: A non-positional approach to teacher leadership. Cambridge: Leadership for Learning.Google Scholar
  42. Szegedi, E., et al. (Ed.). (2018). Guide for facilitators of collaborative teacher learning. E-book, EFFeCT Project. Available at http://effect.tka.hu/methodological-framework
  43. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. West, A., & Bailey, E. (2013). The development of the academies programme: ‘Privatising’ school-based education in England 1986–2013. British Journal of Educational Studies, 61(2), 137–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. West, A., & Wolfe, D. (2018). Academies, the school system in England and a vision for the future (Clare Market Papers No. 23). London: LSE Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
  46. Wolfe, D. (2013). Schools: The legal structures, the accidents of history and the legacies of timing and circumstance. Education Law Journal, 14(2), 100–113.Google Scholar
  47. Woods, P. A. (2013). Sense of purpose: Reconfiguring entrepreneurialism in public education. In C. L. Slater & S. Nelson (Eds.), Understanding the Principalship: An international guide to principal preparation. Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar
  48. Woods, P. A. (2016). Democratic roots: Feeding the multiple dimensions of ‘leadership-as-practice’. In J. Raelin (Ed.), Leadership-as-practice: Theory and application. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Woods, P. A., & Roberts, A. (2014). The new executives in a landscape of change: The emerging reality of plural controlled schooling. In A. Nir (Ed.), The school superintendent: An international perspective. New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  50. Woods, P. A., & Roberts, A. (2018). Collaborative school leadership: A critical guide. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Woods, P. A., & Simkins, T. (2014). Understanding the local: Themes and issues in the experience of structural reform in England. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 42(3), 324–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Woods, P. A., Roberts, A., & Chivers, L. (2016). Collaborative teacher learning: Cases from the HertsCam network. Hatfield: Centre for Educational Leadership, School of Education, University of Hertfordshire.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philip A. Woods
    • 1
    Email author
  • Amanda Roberts
    • 1
  • Joy Jarvis
    • 1
  • Suzanne Culshaw
    • 1
  1. 1.University of HertfordshireHatfieldUK

Personalised recommendations