Decision-Support Framework for the Urban Public Transport System Sustainable Planning: Riga Case Study

  • Irina Yatskiv (Jackiva)Email author
  • Evelina Budilovich (Budiloviča)
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Intelligent Transportation and Infrastructure book series (LNITI)


The primary contribution of this research is the theoretical development of a decision-support framework that identifies the tools and approaches that decision-makers could/should use to create policies and programs that transition society towards sustainability. The framework is then used to consider how Riga municipality might move the city’s transportation system towards sustainability and particular aspect – to planning decisions for passenger network in Riga City in the frame of Rail Baltica project – Riga central multimodal public transportation hub.

Multi-modal transportation planning should have integrated institutions, networks, stations, user information, and fare payment systems it needs to consider all significant impacts, including long-term, indirect and non-market impacts such as equity and land use changes. One of the key-stone questions in this case study - multi-modal transportation planning requires consideration of the factors that affect accessibility and whether they are currently considered in planning?


Public transport system Planning Sustainable indicators 



This paper is based on the research and work that has been conducted in the framework of the SUMBA project (, which has received funding from the European Union Interreg Baltic Sea Region Cross Border Cooperation Programme “Sustainable Urban Mobility and Commuting in Baltic States – SUMBA” (PVS ID 3673). The authors would like to thank both the consortium of the project and the European Commission.


  1. 1.
    UNWC, Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1987).
  2. 2.
    Strategy, Riga Sustainable development strategy of Riga until 2030. Riga city development department, Rīga (2014).
  3. 3.
    UN ESCAP, Sustainable Urban Transportation Systems, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP) (2012).
  4. 4.
    Jeon, C., Amekudzi, A.: Addressing sustainability in transportation systems: definitions. Indic. Metrics 11, 31–50 (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boschmanna, E.E., Kwana, M.P.: Toward socially sustainable urban transportation: progress and potentials. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 2(3), 138–157 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Enoch, M.P.: Sustainable Transport, Mobility Management and Travel Plans, 1st edn. Ashgate Press, Routledge (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Maya, A.D.: Urban transport and sustainability: the key challenges. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 7(3), 170–185 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lama, W.H.K., Sumaleea, A.: Introduction: modeling for sustainable urban transportation. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 7(3), 167–169 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gössling, S.: Planning sustainable transport, by Barry Hutton. J. Sustain. Tourism 22(8), 1268–1269 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lia, Z.-C., Lia, Z.-K., Lambc, W.H.K.: An integrated design of sustainable land use and transportation system with uncertainty in future population. Transportmetrica A: Transp. Sci. 10(2), 160–185 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    ETF, TRUST: Trade Union Vision on Sustainable Transport, European Transport Workers’ Federation: EU, (2006–2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    EC, BEST: Benchmarking European Sustainable Transport, European Commission: Benchmarking European Sustainable Transport: European Commission: Directorate-General for Energy and Transport (2000–2003)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Intelligent Energy Europe, SEGmented Marketing for ENergy efficient Transport: Intelligent Energy Europe, EU (2010–2013).
  14. 14.
    EC, Sustainable Transport in Europe and Links and Liaisons with America, European Commission (2001–2005).
  15. 15.
    Endurance, Project Endurance, EU (2015).
  16. 16.
    Sumba, Sustainable Urban Mobility and Commuting in Baltic Cities, EU (2017).
  17. 17.
    Sdoukopoulos, A., et al.: Measuring progress towards transport sustainability through indicators: analysis and metrics of the main indicator initiatives. Transp. Res. Part D 67(2019), 316–333 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yatskiv (Jackiva), I., Budilovich (Budiloviča), E.: Evaluating Riga transport system accessibility. In: 16th Conference on Reliability and Statistics in Transportation and Communication, RelStat 2016, Procedia Engineering (2017). ISSN 1877-7058Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yatskiv (Jackiva), I., Budilovich (Budiloviča), E., Gromule, V.: Accessibility to Riga public transport services for transit passengers. In: 10th International Scientific Conference Transbaltica 2017: Transportation Science and Technology, Vilnius (2017)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tsami, M., Budilovich (Budiloviča), E., Magginas, V., Adamos, G., Yatskiv (Jackiva), I.: Assessing the design and operation of Riga’s international coach terminal, Riga, Latvia. In: Kabashkin, I., Yatskiv, I., Prentkovskis, O. (eds.) Reliability and Statistics in Transportation and Communication, RelStat 2017. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol. 36, pp. 497–506. Springer (2018)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tsami, M., Adamos, G., Nathanail, E., Budilovich (Budiloviča), E., Yatskiv (Jackiva), I., Magginas, V.: A decision tree approach for achieving high customer satisfaction at urban interchanges. J. Transp. Telecommun. 19(3), 194–202 (2018)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Irina Yatskiv (Jackiva)
    • 1
    Email author
  • Evelina Budilovich (Budiloviča)
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Transport and Telecommunication InstituteRigaLatvia
  2. 2.Riga City Council Development DepartmentRigaLatvia

Personalised recommendations