Advertisement

Energy and Ecological CI Engine Indicators Having Replaced Diesel with Chicken Fat

  • Alfredas RimkusEmail author
  • Tadas Vipartas
  • Jonas Matijošius
  • Saulius Stravinskas
  • Oleksandra Shepel
Conference paper
  • 28 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Intelligent Transportation and Infrastructure book series (LNITI)

Abstract

Diesel-powered compression ignition (CI) engines use fossil fuels, which results in increasing greenhouse gas emissions and environmental pollution. Chicken fat, which is attributed to renewable fuels, is one of possible alternatives to diesel. This Article presents an experimental comparative research at various speeds (from 60 km/h to 90 km/h), replacing diesel with chicken fat at 30%, 50%, 70% and 100%. Cold chicken fat is highly viscous, so fuel was heated. Measurements of volumetric fuel consumption and the analysis of pollutant (CO2, HC, NOx and smoke) concentration in engine exhausts were performed revealing that fuel consumption increases with increasing chicken fat concentration in fuel, and the Brake Thermal Efficiency of the engine decreases. CO2 concentration increases, but HC and NOx concentration and smoke decrease. This is due to a change in the combustion process and the chemical composition of fuel having replaced diesel with chicken fat.

Keywords

Fuel consumption Pollutants Compression ignition engine Diesel Chicken fat 

References

  1. 1.
    Othman, M.F., Adam, A., Najafi, G., Mamat, R.: Green fuel as alternative fuel for diesel engine: a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 80, 694–709 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alptekin, E., Canakci, M., Ozsezen, A.N., Turkcan, A., Sanli, H.: Using waste animal fat based biodiesels–bioethanol–diesel fuel blends in a DI diesel engine. Fuel 157, 245–254 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Awad, S., Loubar, K., Tazerout, M.: Experimental investigation on the combustion, performance and pollutant emissions of biodiesel from animal fat residues on a direct injection diesel engine. Energy 69, 826–836 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Armas, O., Gómez, A., Ramos, Á.: Comparative study of pollutant emissions from engine starting with animal fat biodiesel and GTL fuels. Fuel 113, 560–570 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Banković-Ilić, I.B., Stojković, I.J., Stamenković, O.S., Veljkovic, V.B., Hung, Y.-T.: Waste animal fats as feedstocks for biodiesel production. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 32, 238–254 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Behçet, R.: Evaluation as fuel diesel engine of methyl esters derived from waste animal fats. Energy Explor. Exploit. 33, 227–242 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Duda, K., Wierzbicki, S., Śmieja, M., Mikulski, M.: Comparison of performance and emissions of a CRDI diesel engine fuelled with biodiesel of different origin. Fuel 212, 202–222 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gandure, J., Ketlogetswe, C., Jonas, M.: Production, composition and fuel properties of tallow biodiesel: a case of Botswana. Energy Power Eng. 09, 355–365 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rajak, U., Verma, T.N.: Effect of emission from ethylic biodiesel of edible and non-edible vegetable oil, animal fats, waste oil and alcohol in CI engine. Energy Convers. Manag. 166, 704–718 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Huang, L., Bohac, S.V., Chernyak, S.M., Batterman, S.A.: Effects of fuels, engine load and exhaust after-treatment on diesel engine SVOC emissions and development of SVOC profiles for receptor modeling. Atmos. Environ. 102, 228–238 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chakraborty, R., Gupta, A.K., Chowdhury, R.: Conversion of slaughterhouse and poultry farm animal fats and wastes to biodiesel: parametric sensitivity and fuel quality assessment. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 29, 120–134 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shahir, V.K., Jawahar, C.P., Suresh, P.R., Vinod, V.: Experimental investigation on performance and emission characteristics of a common rail direct InjectionEngine using animal fat biodiesel blends. Energy Procedia 117, 283–290 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hoekman, S.K., Robbins, C.: Review of the effects of biodiesel on NOx emissions. Fuel Process. Technol. 96, 237–249 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mata, T.M., Cardoso, N., Ornelas, M., Neves, S., Caetano, N.S.: Evaluation of two purification methods of biodiesel from beef tallow, pork lard, and chicken fat. Energy Fuels 25, 4756–4762 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Heywood, J.B.: Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals. McGraw-Hill, New York (1988)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Singh, D., Subramanian, K.A., Singal, S.K.: Emissions and fuel consumption characteristics of a heavy duty diesel engine fueled with Hydroprocessed Renewable Diesel and Biodiesel. Appl. Energy 155, 440–446 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chauhan, B.S., Singh, R.K., Cho, H.M., Lim, H.C.: Practice of diesel fuel blends using alternative fuels: a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 59, 1358–1368 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Guan, C., Cheung, C.S., Li, X., Huang, Z.: Effects of oxygenated fuels on the particle-phase compounds emitted from a diesel engine. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 8, 209–220 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Asokan, M.A., Senthur prabu, S., Kamesh, S., Khan, W.: Performance, combustion and emission characteristics of diesel engine fuelled with papaya and watermelon seed oil bio-diesel/diesel blends. Energy 145, 238–245 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alfredas Rimkus
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Tadas Vipartas
    • 2
  • Jonas Matijošius
    • 1
    • 2
  • Saulius Stravinskas
    • 1
    • 2
  • Oleksandra Shepel
    • 1
  1. 1.Vilnius Gediminas Technical UniversityVilniusLithuania
  2. 2.Vilnius College of Technologies and DesignVilniusLithuania

Personalised recommendations