Why Bohmian Approach to Quantum Econometrics: An Algebraic Explanation

  • Vladik KreinovichEmail author
  • Olga Kosheleva
  • Songsak Sriboonchitta
Part of the Studies in Computational Intelligence book series (SCI, volume 878)


Many equations in economics and finance are very complex. As a result, existing methods of solving these equations are very complicated and time-consuming. In many practical situations, more efficient algorithms for solving new complex equations appear when it turns out that these equations can be reduced to equations from other application areas—equations for which more efficient algorithms are already known. It turns out that some equations in economics and finance can be reduced to equations from physics—namely, from quantum physics. The resulting approach for solving economic equations is known as quantum econometrics. In quantum physics, the main objects are described by complex numbers; so, to have a reduction, we need to come up with an economic interpretation of these complex numbers. It turns out that in many cases, the most efficient interpretation comes when we separately interpret the absolute value (modulus) and the phase of each corresponding quantum number; the resulting techniques are known as Bohmian econometrics. In this paper, we use an algebraic approach—namely, the idea of invariance and symmetries—to explain why such an interpretation is empirically the best.


Quantum econometrics Bohmian approach Algebraic explanation 



This work was supported by the Center of Excellence in Econometrics, Faculty of Economics, Chiang Mai University, Thailand, and by the US National Science Foundation via grant HRD-1242122 (Cyber-ShARE Center of Excellence).

The authors are greatly thankful to Professor Hung T. Nguyen for his help and encouragement.


  1. 1.
    Accardi, L., Boukas, A.: The quantum Black-Scholes equation. Glob. J. Pure Appl. Math. 2(2), 155–170 (2007)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baaquie, B.E.: Quantum field theory of forward rates with stochastic volatility. Phys. Rev. E 65, Paper 056122 (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baaquie, B.E.: Quantum Finance: Path Integrals and Hamiltonians for Options and Interest Rates. Camridge University Press, New York (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baaquie, B.E., Marakani, S.: Finite hedging in field theory models of interest rates. Phys. Rev. E 69, Paper 036130 (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baaquie, B.E., Srikant, M., Warachka, M.: A quantum field theory term structure model applied to hedging. Int. J. Theor. Appl. Finance 65, 443 (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bohm, D.: Quantum Theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1952)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bohm, D., Hiley, B.: The Undivided Universe: An Ontological Interpretation of Quantum mechanics. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London (1993)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Choustova, O.: Bohmian mechanics for financial process. J. Mod. Opt. 51, Paper 1111 (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Choustova, O.: Quantum Bohmian model for financial markets. Physica A 347, 304–314 (2006)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Choustova, O.: Quantum model for the price dynamics: the problem of smoothness of trajectories. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 346, 296–304 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Choustova, O.: Quantum probability and financial market. Inf. Sci. 179, 478–484 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Feynman, R., Leighton, R., Sands, M.: The Feynman Lectures on Physics. Addison Wesley, Boston, MA (2005)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Finkelstein, A.M., Kreinovich, V., Zapatrin, R.R.: Fundamental physical equations uniquely determined by their symmetry groups. In: Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1214, pp. 159–170. Springer, Heidelberg (1986)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Haven, E.: A discussion on embedding the Black-Scholes option pricing model in a quantum physics setting. Physica A 304, 507–524 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Haven, E.: A Black-Scholes Shrodinger option price: ‘bit’ versus ‘qubit’". Physica A 324, 201–206 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Haven, E.: Pilot-wave theory and financial option pricing. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 44(11), 1957–1962 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Haven, E., Khrennikov, A.: Quantum Social Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kreinovich, V., Lakeyev, A., Rohn, J., Kahl, P.: Computational Complexity and Feasibility of Data Processing and Interval Computations. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kreinovich, V., Liu, G.: We live in the best of possible worlds: Leibniz’s insight helps to derive equations of modern physics. In: Pisano, R., Fichant, M., Bussotti, P., Oliveira, A.R.E. (eds.) The Dialogue Between Sciences, Philosophy and Engineering. New Historical and Epistemological Insights, Homage to Gottfried W. Leibnitz 1646–1716, pp. 207–226. College Publications, London (2017)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kreinovich, V., Nguyen, H.T., Sriboonchitta, S.: Quantum ideas in economics beyond quantum econometrics. In: Anh, L.H., Dong, L.S., Kreinovich, V., Thach, N.N (eds.) Econometrics for Financial Applications, pp. 146–151. Springer, Cham, Switzerland (2018)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Papadimitriou, C.H.: Computational Complexity. Pearson, Boston, MA (1993)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pedram, P.: The minimal length uncertainty and the quantum model for the stock market. Physica A 391, 2100–2105 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Seagal, W., Seagal, I.E.: The Black-Scholes pricing formula in the quantum context. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 4072–4075 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sriboonchitta, S., Nguyen, H.T., Kosheleva, O., Kreinovich, V., Nguyen, T.N.: Quantum approach explains the need for expert knowledge: on the example of econometrics. In: Kreinovich, V., Sriboonchitta, S. (eds.) Structural Changes and Their Econometric Modeling, pp. 172–181. Springer, Cham, Switzerland (2019)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Svitek, M., Kosheleva, O., Kreinovich, V., Thach, N.N.: Why quantum (wave probability) models are a good description of many non-quantum complex systems, and how to go beyond quantum models. In: Kreinovich, V., Trung, N.D., Thach, N.N. (eds.) Beyond Traditional Probabilistic Methods in Economics, pp. 168–175. Springer, Cham, Switzerland (2019)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vladik Kreinovich
    • 1
    Email author
  • Olga Kosheleva
    • 1
  • Songsak Sriboonchitta
    • 2
  1. 1.University of Texas at El PasoEl PasoUSA
  2. 2.Faculty of EconomicsChiang Mai UniversityChiang MaiThailand

Personalised recommendations