Advertisement

The Effects of Ecological and Sustainable Chemical Surface Modification Methods on the Properties of Lignocellulose-Based Fibers

  • Emine Dilara KoçakEmail author
  • Merdan Nigar
Chapter
  • 15 Downloads
Part of the Sustainable Textiles: Production, Processing, Manufacturing & Chemistry book series (STPPMC)

Abstract

Ecological and sustainable production has attracted great attention recently because of the rapid consumption of natural resources and increase in environmental problems due to synthetic production activities globally. Therefore, natural-based materials find their place in production activity progressively. The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization and the Common Fund for Commodities (CFC) evince strict regulations for governments in order to clear harmful chemical reactions and environment in line with the genuine environmental awareness that is envisaged by the use of plant-based materials. Identification of the use of agricultural waste and legislations by governments will lead to the use of natural materials in this direction.

Lignocellulose-based fibers are used in the production of green composites because of easy shaping, low price, and variety of raw materials, and they can be considered as suitable candidates for sustainable production in the generations to come. Surface modifications of lignocellulose-based fibers are made by using chemical and enzyme-based agents on the surface of the fibers. This process increases the functional properties of the fibers and enables fibers to be used in the industrial scale. Chemical surface modifications are carried out by conventional methods as well as ecological methods such as ultrasonic energy, microwave energy, and plasma technique.

In this chapter, chemical methods for the fibrillation of lignocellulose-based fibers (bananas, Agave americana, sisal, raffia, artichoke, etc.) are compared with ecological methods (ultrasonic, microwave, and plasma methods) and enzymes in terms of physical, mechanical, and morphological properties of fibers. Thus, it can be concluded that ecological methods improve the properties of the fibers and help to reduce the chemical waste, water, and energy consumption.

Keywords

Lignocellulosic fibers Sustainability Ecological Ultrasonic energy Microwave energy 

References

  1. 1.
    Ivanković A, Dronjić A, Martinović Bevanda A, Talić S (2017) Review of 12 principles of green chemistry in practice. Int J Sustain Green Energy 6(3):39–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gielen D, Boshella F, Saygin D, Bazilian M, Wagner N, Gorinia R (2019) The role of renewable energy in the global energy transformation. Energy Strat Rev 24:38–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chapagain A, Hoekstra A, Savenije Hubert HG, Gautam R (2006) The water footprint of cotton consumption: an assessment of the impact of worldwide consumption of cotton products on the water resources in the cotton producing countries. Ecol Econ 60(1):186–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Khalil HPSA, Jawaid M, Firoozian P, Amjad M, Zainudin Z, Paridah MT (2013) Tensile, electrical conductivity, and morphological properties of carbon black-filled epoxy composites. Int J Polym Anal Charact 18(5):329–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chandramohan A, Alagar M (2013) Preparation and characterization of cyclohexyl moiety toughened POSS-reinforced epoxy nanocomposites. Int J Polym Anal Charact 18(1):73–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Baker DA, Rials T (2013) Recent advances in low-cost carbon fiber manufacture from lignin. J Appl Polym Sci 130:713–728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mallakpour S, Zadehnazari A (2012) New organosoluble, thermally stable, and nanostructured poly (amideimide)s with dopamine pendant groups: microwave-assisted synthesis and characterization. Int J Polym Anal Charact 17(6):408–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wanasekara ND, Chalivendra V, Calvert P (2012) Effect of accelerated ultraviolet and thermal exposure on nanoscale mechanical properties of nylon fibers. Polym Eng Sci 52(11):2482–2488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ahmed MN, Kumar PV, Shivanand HK, Muzammil SB (2013) A study on effect of variation of thickness on tensile properties of hybrid polymer composites (glassfibre-carbonfibre-graphite) and GFRP composites. Int J Eng Res Appl 3(4):2015–2024Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Avella M, Buzarovska A, Errico ME, Gentile G, Grozdanov A (2009) Eco-challenges of bio-based polymer composites. Materials 37(2):911–925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Koronis G, Silva A, Fontul M (2013) Green composites: a review of adequate materials for automotive applications. Compos Part B 44:120–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dittenber DB, GangaRao HVS (2012) Critical review of recent publications on use of natural composites in infrastructure. Compos Part A 43:1419–1429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Thakur VK, Thakur MK, Gupta RK (2013) Graft copolymers from cellulose: synthesis, characterization and evaluation. Carbohydr Polym 97(1):18–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Atluri RPV, Rao KM, Gupta AVSSKS (2013) Experimental investigation of mechanical properties of golden cane fiber-reinforced polyester composites. Int J Polym Anal Charact 18(1):30–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Saheb DN, Jog JP (1999) Natural fiber polymer composites: a review. Adv Polym Technol 18(4):351–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Keshwani DR, Cheng JJ, Burns JC, Li L, Chiang V (2007) Microwave pre-treatment of switch grass to enhance enzymatic hydrolysis. In: Proceedings of the ASABE annual international meeting, no. 077127Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kocak D, Merdan N, Evren OB (2014) Research into the specifications of woven composites obtained from raffia fibers pretreated using the ecological method. Text Res J 85:302–315.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0040517514545257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Li X, Tabil LG, Panigrahi S (2007) Chemical treatments of natural fiber for use in natural fiber-reinforced composites: a review. J Polym Environ 15:25–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Van de Weyenberg I, Ivens J, De Coster A, Kino B, Baetens E, Verpoest I (2003) Influence of processing and chemical treatment of flax fibres on their composites. Compos Sci Technol 63:1241–1246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Seki Y (2009) Innovative multifunctional siloxane treatment of jute fiber surface and its effect on the mechanical properties of jute/thermoset composites. Mater Sci Eng A 508:247–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Van Deweyenberg I, Ivens J, De Coster A, Kino B, Baetens E, Verpoest I (2010) Influence of processing and chemical treatment of flax fibres on their composites. Compos Sci Technol 63(9):1241–1246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mishra S, Mohanty AK, Drzal LT, Misra M, Hinrichsen G (2004) A review on pineapple leaf fibers, sisal fibers and their biocomposites. Macromol Mater Eng 289:955–974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Albano C, Gonzalez J, Ichazo M, Kaiser D (1999) Thermal stability of blends of polyolefins and sisal fiber. Polym Degrad Stab 66:179–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Calado V, Barreto DW, D’almeida JRM (2000) The effect of a chemical treatment on the structure and morphology of coir fibers. J Mater Sci Lett 19:2151–2153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hill ASC, Abdul Khalil HPS, Hale MD (1998) A study of the potential of acetylation to improve the properties of plant fibres. Ind Crop Prod 8(1):53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sreekala MS, Thomas S (2003) Effect of fibre surface modification on water-sorption characteristics of oil palm fibres. Compos Sci Technol 63(6):861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Beckmann A, Kleinholz R (1999) Proceedings of 2 internationals symposium Werkstoffe aus Nachwachsenden Rohstoffen, Erfurt, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sawada K, Ueda M (2001) Enzymes processing of textile in reserve micellar solution. J Biotechnol 89:263–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Benko Z et al (2008) Evaluation of the role of xyloglucanase in the enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic substrates. Enzym Microb Technol 43:109–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Maximo C et al (2003) Biotransformation of industrial reactive – azo dyes by Geotrichum sp. CCMI 1019. Enzym Microb Technol 32:145–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Vajnhandl S, Le Marechal AM (2005) Ultrasound in textile dyeing and the decolouration/mineralization of textile dyes. Dyes Pigments 65(2):89–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Khatri Z, Memonb MH, Khatri A, Tanwari A (2011) Cold pad-batch dyeing method for cotton fabric dyeing with reactive dyes using ultrasonic energy. Ultrason Sonochem 18:1301–1307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Guesmi A, Ladhari N, Sakli F (2013) Ultrasonic preparation of cationic cotton and its application in ultrasonic natural dyeing. Ultrason Sonochem 20:571–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kamel MM, Helmy HM, Mashaly MH, Kafafy HH (2010) Ultrasonic assisted dyeing: dyeing of acrylic fabrics C.I. Astrazon Basic Red 5BL 200. Ultrason Sonochem 17:92–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Atav R (2013) The use of new technologies in dyeing of proteinous fibers. In: Eco-friendly textile dyeing and finishing, vol 5. INTECH, Rijeka, pp 103–147Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ahmed NSE, El-Shishtawy RM (2010) The use of new technologies in coloration of textile fibers. J Mater Sci 45:1143–1153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Delany MJ (1972) Pad-batch microwave dyeing of wool. Text Chem Color 4(5):119–122Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Haggag K, Hana HL, Youssef BM, El-Shimy NS (1995) Dyeing polyester with microwave heating using disperse dyestuffs. Am Dyest Rep 84(3):22–36Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kocak D, Merdan N, Yuksek M, Sancak E (2013) Effects of chemical modifications on mechanical properties of Luffa cylindrica. Asian J Chem 25(2):637–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Tyler V (1993) The honest herbal: a sensible guide to use of herbs and related remedies, 3rd edn. Pharmaceutical Products Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Merdan N, Ozturk Z, Kocak D, Akalın M (2013) The bleaching of Agava Americano fibers with enviromental methods. In: 2nd international conference on value addition & innovation in textiles Faisalabad, Pakistan, 18–19 March 2013Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Haller JS (1990) A drug for all seasons. Medical and pharmacological history of aloe. Bull N Y Acad Med 66(6):647–659Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Merdan N, Canbolat S, Sancak E, Kocak D (2013) The effect of ultrasonic energy on physical properties of sisal fibers. In: 2nd international conference on value addition & innovation in textiles, Faisalabad, Pakistan, 18–19 March 2013Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Esener R. http://www.palmiyemerkezi.com.tr. Date of access 12 Sept 2019
  45. 45.
    Yan L, Mai YW, Ye L (2000) Sisal fibre and its composites: a review of recent developments. Compos Sci Technol 60:2037–2055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Bisanda ETN, Ansell MP (1990) Properties of sisal-CNSL composites. J Mater Sci 27:1690–1700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Andressa MC, Cioffi MOH, Voorwald HJC (2012) Thermal and mechanical behaviour of sisal/phenolic composites. Compos B Eng 43:2843–2850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Flavio AS, Chawlab N, Filho RDT (2009) An experimental investigation of the fatigue behavior of sisal fibers. Mater Sci Eng 516:90–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Mistik Sİ, Koçak ED, Merdan N (2016) Effect of the ecological methods on the surface modification of the kenaf fibers. Mater Sci 22(3):409–413Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Chen Y, Chiparus O, Sun L, Negulescu I, Parikh DV, Calamari TA (2005) Natural fibers for automotive nonwoven composites. J Ind Text 35:523–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Mohanty AK, Misra M, Hinrichsen G (2000) Biofibres, biodegradable polymers and biocomposites. Macromol Mater Eng 1:276–277Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Yang HS, Kim HJ, Park HJ, Lee BJ, Hwang TS (2007) Effect of compatibilizing agents on rice-husk flour reinforced polypropylene composites. Compos Struct 77:45–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Kim HS, Yang HS, Kim HJ (2005) Biodegradability and mechanical properties of agro-flour-filled polybutylene succinate biocomposites. J Appl Polym Sci 97:1513–1521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Byoung-Ho L, Hee-Soo K, Sena L, Hyun-Joong K, John R (2009) Bio-composites of kenaf fibers in polylactide: role of improved interfacial adhesion in the carding process. Compos Sci Technol 69:2573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Aziz SH, Ansell MP (2010) Combined effects of water absorption due to water immersion, soil buried and natural weather on mechanical properties of kenaf fibre unsaturated polyester composites (KFUPC). Compos Sci Technol 5:11–17Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Gassan J, Bledzki AK (1999) Alkali treatment of jute fibers: relationship between structure and mechanical properties. J Appl Polym Sci 71(4):623–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Joseph K, Mattoso LHC, Toledo RD, Thomas S, de Carvalho LH, Pothen L, Kala S, James B (2000) Natural fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites. In: Frollini E, Leão AL, Mattoso LHC (eds) Natural polymers and agrofibers composites. Embrapa, USP-IQSC, UNESP, São Carlos, p 159Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Koçak ED (2008) The influence of ultrasonic energy on chemical treatment of surface properties and the properties of composites made of Luffa cylindrical fiber–polyester resin. J Eng Mater Technol 130(4):1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Yang H, Mao H, Ran QL, Jian G, Liu Y (2011) Esterification of luffa with acetic anhydride under microwave radiation determined by FTIR. J Macromol Sci B Phys 50:319–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Prasad PN (ed) (1998) Science and technology of polymers and advanced materials. Plenum Press, New York, pp 798–753Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Koçak D (2008) Study of the effects different chemical compound applied on Luffa cylindrical fibres with the help of ultrasonic energy. J Polym Eng 28(8):501–515Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Akalın M, Merdan N, Koçak D, Usta I (2004) Effects of ultrasonic energy on the wash fastness of reactive dyes. Ultrasonics 42:161–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Akalın M, Merdan N, Koçak D, Usta I (2004) Effects of ultrasonic energy on dyeing of polyamide (micro fiber)/Lycra blends. Ultrasonics 42:165–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Textile EngineeringMarmara University, Faculty of TechnologyIstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Istanbul Commerce University, Faculty of Architecture and DesignIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations