Sustainability in the Apparel Industry: The Role of Consumers’ Fashion Consciousness

  • Matteo De AngelisEmail author
  • Cesare Amatulli
  • Giulia Pinato
Part of the Sustainable Textiles: Production, Processing, Manufacturing & Chemistry book series (STPPMC)


Sustainability represents a central issue for the fashion industry. Indeed, if on the one hand, this sector is facing a growing demand on a global basis, on the other hand, it receives growing pressures to be more environmentally friendly and socially responsible. The worldwide textile production has more than doubled in the last decades, but the UN Framework Convention about the climate change claims that the industry generates more greenhouse gas emissions than those generated by the international maritime shipping and the aviation sectors together. Importantly, fashion consumers, in particular millennials and those belonging to the Z-Generation, are increasingly more interested in sustainability and thus increasingly expect apparel brands to sell products produced in a responsible way. In this study we investigate the appeal of sustainability in the fashion business. In particular, we shed light on how the role of sustainability may change depending on consumers’ approach to luxury, which essentially refers to whether consumers buy luxury goods mainly for status or mainly for personal style. We propose that consumers’ willingness to buy sustainable apparel products is affected by the type of fashion brand, that is, fast fashion versus luxury fashion. Results of our empirical analysis conducted using the experimental design method show that, in the apparel context, sustainability is more appealing to consumers who buy luxury mainly for personal style when it is associated with a luxury brand, while it is more appealing to consumers who buy luxury mainly for status when sustainability is associated with a fast-fashion brand. Implications of our work for theory and practice are also discussed.


Sustainability Fast fashion brands Luxury fashion brands Apparel industry Luxury consumption approach Purchase intention 


  1. Achabou MA, Dekhili SS (2013) Luxury and sustainable development: is there a match? J Bus Res 66(10):1896–1903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. AFP (2008) WWF épingle l’industrie du luxe sur l’environnement. Agence France Presse, ParisGoogle Scholar
  3. Ageorges D (2010) Luxe Et Développement Durable Au Palais De Tokyo Pour Parler Avenir. Agence France Presse, ParisGoogle Scholar
  4. Allérès D (1997) Luxe. Stratégies, marketing. Economica, ParisGoogle Scholar
  5. Amatulli C, Guido G (2011) Determinants of purchasing intention for fashion luxury goods in the Italian market: a laddering approach. J Fash Mark Manag 15(1):123–136Google Scholar
  6. Amatulli C, Guido G, Nataraajan R (2015) Luxury purchasing among older consumers: exploring inferences about cognitive age, status, and style motivations. J Bus Res 68:1945–1952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Amatulli C, De Angelis M, Costabile M, Guido G (2017) Sustainable luxury brands: Evidence from research and implications for managers. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  8. Barnes L, Lea-Greenwood G (2006) Fast fashioning the supply chain: shaping the research agenda. J Fash Mark Manag 10:259–271Google Scholar
  9. Beard N (2008) The branding of ethical fashion and the consumer: A luxury niche or a mass market reality? Fash Theory 12(4):447–468Google Scholar
  10. Bick R, Halsey E, Ekenga CC (2018) The global environmental injustice of fast fashion. Environ Health 17:92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Catry B (2003) The great pretenders: the magic of luxury goods. Bus Strateg Rev 14:10–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chakraborty S, De S, DasGupta S, Basu JK (2005) Adsorption study for the removal of a basic dye: experimental and modeling. Chemosphere 18:1079–1086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Corneo G, Jeanne O (1997) Conspicuous consumption, snobbism and conformism. J Public Econ 66:55–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Davies IA, Lee Z, Ahonkhai I (2012) Do consumers care about ethical-luxury? J Bus Ethics 106(1):37–51Google Scholar
  15. Dodds WB, Monroe KB, Grewal D (1991) Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers’ product evaluations. J Mark Res 28:307–319Google Scholar
  16. Dubois B, Laurent G (1996) The functions of luxury: A situational approach to excursionism. ACR North American AdvancesGoogle Scholar
  17. Eastman JK, Eastman KL (2015) Conceptualizing a model of status consumption theory: an exploration of the antecedents and consequences of the motivation to consume for status. Mark Manag J 25:1–15Google Scholar
  18. EPRS – European Parliamentary Research Service (2019) Environmental impact of the textile and clothing industry. Accessed 7 Oct 2019
  19. Fletcher K (2008) Sustainable fashion & textiles. Design journeys. Earthscan, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  20. Gam HJ (2011) Are fashion-conscious consumers more likely to adopt eco-friendly clothing? J Fash Mark Manag Int J 15:178–193Google Scholar
  21. Godart F, Seong S (2014) Is sustainable luxury possible? In: Sustainable luxury managing social and environmental performance in iconic brands. Greenleaf Publishing, SheffieldGoogle Scholar
  22. Grail Research (2010) Green – the new color of luxury: moving to a sustainable futureGoogle Scholar
  23. Guedes M (2011) Ethical fashion brands: promotion or a real value? International conference fashion and communication, CECL, LisbonGoogle Scholar
  24. Guinebault M (2019) Davos Global Fashion Agenda si concentra sul riscaldamento globale.,1060327.html#.XP0H3Kdabv1. Accessed 2 Mar 2019
  25. Han YJ, Nunes JC, Drèze X (2010) Signaling status with luxury goods: the role of brand prominence. J Mark 74:15–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hayes AF (2013) Methodology in the social sciences. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. Guilford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Jackson T, Michaelis L (2003) Policies for sustainable consumption. Sustainable Development Commission, LondonGoogle Scholar
  28. Joergens C (2006) Ethical fashion: myth or future trend? J Fash Mark Manag 10(3):360–371Google Scholar
  29. Joy A, Sherry J, Venkatesh A, Wang JJ (2012) Fast fashion, sustainability, and the ethical appeal of luxury brands. Fash Theory 16:273–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kapferer JN (2010) All that glitters is not green: the challenge of sustainable luxury. Available at: Accessed 20 Apr 2019
  31. Kemp S (1998) Perceiving luxury and necessity. J Econ Psychol 19:591–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kim AJ, Ko E (2012) Do social media marketing activities enhance customer equity? An empirical study of luxury fashion brand. J Bus Res 65:1480–1486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kim KH, Ko E, Xu B, Han Y (2012) Increasing customer equity of luxury fashion brands through nurturing consumer attitude. J Bus Res 65:1495–1499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Langenwalter G (2009) Planet first. Ind Manag 51:10–12Google Scholar
  35. Lochard C, Murat A (2011) Luxe et développement durable: La nouvelle alliance. Eyrolles, ParisGoogle Scholar
  36. McAfee A, Dessain V, Sjoman A (2004) Zara: IT for fast fashion. Harvard Business School, BostonGoogle Scholar
  37. Morgan LR, Birtwistle G (2009) An investigation of young fashion consumers’ disposal habits. Division of Fashion, Marketing and Retailing, Glasgow Caledonian University, GlasgowCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Muret D (2019) Chanel investe nel produttore di materiali biodegradabili Sulapac.,1045284.html#.XP0Esadabv1. Accessed 2 Mar 2019
  39. Niinimäki K (2010) Eco-clothing, consumer identity and ideology. Sustain Dev 18:150–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. O’Cass A, McEwen H (2004) Exploring consumer status and conspicuous consumption. J Consum Behav 4:25–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ochoa LMC (2011) Will “Eco-Fashion” take off? A survey of potential customers of organic cotton clothes in London. AD-Minister. Fondo Editorial Universidad EAFIT, MedellínGoogle Scholar
  42. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our common future. The Brundtland Commission to the United Nations. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  43. Seidman D (2007) How we do anything means everything. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJGoogle Scholar
  44. Shukla P (2011) Impact of interpersonal influences, brand origin and brand image on luxury purchase intentions: measuring interfunctional interactions and a cross-national comparison. J World Bus 46:242–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sombart W (1913) Der Burgeois. Duncker & Humblot, MunchenGoogle Scholar
  46. Streit CM, Davies IA (2013) Sustainability isn’t sexy: an exploratory study into luxury fashion. In: Sustainability in fashion and textiles: values, design, production and consumption. Greenleaf Publishing, SheffieldGoogle Scholar
  47. Tramuta L (2018) Why these fashion companies are taking sustainability seriously. Accessed 2 Mar 2019
  48. Tsai S (2005) Impact of personal orientation on luxury-brand purchase value: an international investigation. Int J Mark Res 47:427–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vigneron F, Johnson LW (2004) Measuring perceptions of brand luxury. J Brand Manag 11:484–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Widloecher P (2010) Luxe Et Développement Durable: Je T’aime, Moi Non Plus? LuxefrancaisGoogle Scholar
  51. Wiedmann KP, Hennigs N, Siebels A (2009) Value‐based segmentation of luxury consumption behavior. Psychol Mark 26(7):625–651Google Scholar
  52. Wong CWY, Lai KH, Shang KC, Lu CS (2011) Green operations and the moderating role of environmental management capability of suppliers on manufacturing firm performance. Int J Prod Econ 140:283–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matteo De Angelis
    • 1
    Email author
  • Cesare Amatulli
    • 2
  • Giulia Pinato
    • 1
  1. 1.LUISS UniversityRomeItaly
  2. 2.University of Bari “Aldo Moro”TarantoItaly

Personalised recommendations