Advertisement

Microalgae Cultivation in Wastewater to Recycle Nutrients as Biofertilizer

  • Francisca Maria Santos
  • José Carlos Magalhães PiresEmail author
Chapter
  • 42 Downloads
Part of the Environmental Chemistry for a Sustainable World book series (ECSW, volume 44)

Abstract

Nitrogen and phosphorus are two macronutrients present in chemical fertilizers applied to agricultural practices. Nitrogen is usually produced from the Haber–Bosch synthesis process, which converts atmospheric nitrogen into ammonia using natural gas. Consequently, it generated substantial amounts of CO2, which is the main contributor to global warming. Phosphorus is obtained from nonrenewable phosphate-based minerals using chemical processes with sulfuric acid. This method produces hazardous substances, which have a risk to both human health and the environment. Besides the environmental impacts from the production processes, the nutrient uptake efficiency by the cultures may be very low. Nitrogen can be easily lost to the environment due to denitrification, volatilization, and/or leaching. Phosphate may be converted into insoluble compounds after chemical reaction with soil minerals, which decreases the availability of this nutrient. These losses have major impacts on the environment, polluting the soil, water, and air.

With the increasing tendency of the fertilizer demand for agricultural practices, it is imperative (i) to find sustainable alternatives to chemical fertilizers (minimizing their world market cote) and (ii) to develop technologies that enhance nutrient uptake efficiency, reducing simultaneously the environmental impacts. Nutrient recycling from wastewaters represents a sustainable solution. These effluents have been proposed as sources of nitrogen and phosphorus for the culture of microalgae, with the simultaneous benefit of nitrogen and phosphorus removal (avoiding the environmental negative impacts with their discharge). Then, microalgal biomass can have several applications, including the production of biofertilizers. This process will enable nutrient recycling, reducing the requirement of fertilizers produced in a non-environmentally friendly way. This chapter aims to present the advantages (and research needs) of using microalgal cultures for nutrient recovery from wastewaters.

Keywords

Nutrient recycling Wastewater Microalgae Sustainability Process integration Nitrogen Phosphorus Biofertilizer Circular economy 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by: (i) Project UID/EQU/00511/2019-Laboratory for Process Engineering, Environment, Biotechnology and Energy (LEPABE) funded by national funds through FCT/MCTES (PIDDAC); and (ii) Project POCI-01-0145-FEDER-031736-PIV4Algae (Process Intensification for microalgal production and Valorisation) funded by FEDER funds through COMPETE2020-Programa Operacional Competitividade e Internacionalização (POCI) and by national funds (PIDDAC) through FCT/MCTES. J.C.M. Pires acknowledges the FCT Investigator 2015 Programme (IF/01341/2015).

References

  1. Amstrong D (1999) Important factors affecting crop response to phosphorus. Better Crops 83:16–19Google Scholar
  2. Appl M (2006) Ammonia, vol 1. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim.  https://doi.org/10.1002/14356007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cai T, Park SY, Li Y (2013) Nutrient recovery from wastewater streams by microalgae: status and prospects. Renew Sust Energ Rev 19:360–369.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.11.030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cassman KG, Dobermann A, Walters DT (2002) Agroecosystems, nitrogen-use efficiency, and nitrogen management. AMBIO J Hum Environ 31:132–140.  https://doi.org/10.1639/0044-7447(2002)031[0132:anuean]2.0.co;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chien S, Menon R (1995) Factors affecting the agronomic effectiveness of phosphate rock for direct application. Fertilizer Res 41:227–234.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00748312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chien S, Sale P, Hammond L (1990) Comparison of the effectiveness of phosphorus fertilizer products. In: Phosphorus requirements for sustainable agriculture in Asia and Oceania Int Rice res Inst. International Rice Research Institute, Manila, pp 143–156Google Scholar
  7. Chien S, Prochnow L, Cantarella H (2009) Recent developments of fertilizer production and use to improve nutrient efficiency and minimize environmental impacts. Adv Agron 102:267–322.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2113(09)01008-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chien S, Prochnow L, Tu S, Snyder C (2011) Agronomic and environmental aspects of phosphate fertilizers varying in source and solubility: an update review. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 89:229–255.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-010-9390-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Choudhury A, Kennedy I (2005) Nitrogen fertilizer losses from rice soils and control of environmental pollution problems. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 36:1625–1639.  https://doi.org/10.1081/css-200059104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coppens J, Grunert O, Van Den Hende S, Vanhoutte I, Boon N, Haesaert G, De Gelder L (2016) The use of microalgae as a high-value organic slow-release fertilizer results in tomatoes with increased carotenoid and sugar levels. J Appl Phycol 28:2367–2377.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-015-0775-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cordell D, Drangert J-O, White S (2009) The story of phosphorus: global food security and food for thought. Glob Environ Chang 19:292–305.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.10.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De-Bashan LE, Bashan Y (2004) Recent advances in removing phosphorus from wastewater and its future use as fertilizer (1997–2003). Water Res 38:4222–4246.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2004.07.014CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. FAO (2017) World fertilizer trends and outlook to 2020. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
  14. Fixen P, Brentrup F, Bruulsema T, Garcia F, Norton R, Zingore S (2015) Nutrient/fertilizer use efficiency: measurement, current situation and trends. In: Drechsel P, Heffer P, Magen H, Mikkelsen R, Wichelns D (eds) Managing water and fertilizer for sustainable agricultural intensification. International Fertilizer Industry Association, Paris, pp 8–38Google Scholar
  15. Froehlich P (2013) A sustainable approach to the supply of nitrogen. Parker Balston. https://www.parker.com/literature/Balston%20Filter/IND/IND%20Technical%20Articles/PDFs/Sustainable%20Approach%20to%20N2%20Supply.pdf. Accessed Apr 2018
  16. Garcia-Gonzalez J, Sommerfeld M (2016) Biofertilizer and biostimulant properties of the microalga Acutodesmus dimorphus. J Appl Phycol 28:1051–1061.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-015-0625-2CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Godfray HCJ et al (2010) Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 327:812–818.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1185383CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Gonçalves ALC (2017) Microalgal cultivation for biomass production, carbon dioxide capture and nutrients uptake. Faculdade de Engenharia da Universidade do PortoGoogle Scholar
  19. González LE, Cañizares RO, Baena S (1997) Efficiency of ammonia and phosphorus removal from a Colombian agroindustrial wastewater by the microalgae Chlorella vulgaris and Scenedesmus dimorphus. Bioresour Technol 60:259–262.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0960-8524(97)00029-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grima EM, Fernández FA, Medina AR (2004) 10 downstream processing of cell-mass and products. In: Handbook of microalgal culture: biotechnology and applied phycology, pp 215–252.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470995280.ch10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jones C, Brown B, Engel R, Horneck D, Olson-Rutz K (2013) Factors affecting nitrogen fertilizer volatilizationGoogle Scholar
  22. Kholssi R, Marks EA, Miñón J, Montero O, Debdoubi A, Rad C (2018) Biofertilizing effect of Chlorella sorokiniana suspensions on wheat growth. J Plant Growth Regul:1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-018-9879-7
  23. Kim J et al (2013) Methods of downstream processing for the production of biodiesel from microalgae. Biotechnol Adv 31:862–876.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.04.006CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kool A, Marinussen M, Blonk H (2012) LCI data for the calculation tool feedprint for greenhouse gas emissions of feed production and utilization. GHG Emissions of N, P and K fertilizer productionGoogle Scholar
  25. Lam MK, Lee KT (2012) Microalgae biofuels: a critical review of issues, problems and the way forward. Biotechnol Adv 30:673–690.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.11.008CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Li Y et al (2011) Characterization of a microalga Chlorella sp. well adapted to highly concentrated municipal wastewater for nutrient removal and biodiesel production. Bioresour Technol 102:5138–5144.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.01.091CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Lim S-L, Chu W-L, Phang S-M (2010) Use of Chlorella vulgaris for bioremediation of textile wastewater. Bioresour Technol 101:7314–7322.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.04.092CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Mackay A, Barber S (1984) Soil temperature effects on root growth and phosphorus uptake by corn. Soil Sci Soc Am J 48:818–823.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1984.03615995004800040024xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Martınez M, Sánchez S, Jimenez J, El Yousfi F, Munoz L (2000) Nitrogen and phosphorus removal from urban wastewater by the microalga Scenedesmus obliquus. Bioresour Technol 73:263–272.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0960-8524(99)00121-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pellegrino JL (2000) Energy and environmental profile of the US Chemical Industry prepared by Energetics Incorporated Columbia. Maryland, USA.  https://doi.org/10.2172/1218625
  31. Pérez-López R, Nieto JM, López-Coto I, Aguado JL, Bolívar JP, Santisteban M (2010) Dynamics of contaminants in phosphogypsum of the fertilizer industry of Huelva (SW Spain): from phosphate rock ore to the environment. Appl Geochem 25:705–715.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2010.02.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pragya N, Pandey KK, Sahoo P (2013) A review on harvesting, oil extraction and biofuels production technologies from microalgae. Renew Sust Energ Rev 24:159–171.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.03.034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Razzaq R, Li C, Zhang S (2013) Coke oven gas: availability, properties, purification, and utilization in China. Fuel 113:287–299.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.05.070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Roberts TL (2014) Cadmium and phosphorus fertilizers: the issues and the science. Procedia Eng 83:52–59.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.09.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rockström J et al (2009) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461:472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Smil V (2000) Phosphorus in the environment: natural flows and human interferences. Annu Rev Energy Environ 25:53–88.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.25.1.53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Smith A, Klosek J (2001) A review of air separation technologies and their integration with energy conversion processes. Fuel Process Technol 70:115–134.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-3820(01)00131-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Spolaore P, Joannis-Cassan C, Duran E, Isambert A (2006) Commercial applications of microalgae. J Biosci Bioeng 101:87–96.  https://doi.org/10.1263/jbb.101.87CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Syers J, Johnston A, Curtin D (2008) Efficiency of soil and fertilizer phosphorus use: reconciling changing concepts of soil phosphorus behaviour with agronomic information vol 18. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).  https://doi.org/10.1017/s0014479708007138
  40. Tartakovsky D, Stern E, Broday DM (2016) Indirect estimation of emission factors for phosphate surface mining using air dispersion modeling. Sci Total Environ 556:179–188.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.207CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Tilman D, Cassman KG, Matson PA, Naylor R, Polasky S (2002) Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 418:671.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01014CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Tilman D, Balzer C, Hill J, Befort BL (2011) Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108:20260–20264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Timilsena YP, Adhikari R, Casey P, Muster T, Gill H, Adhikari B (2015) Enhanced efficiency fertilisers: a review of formulation and nutrient release patterns. J Sci Food Agric 95:1131–1142.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.6812CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Umesha C, Sridhara C, Kumarnaik A (2017) Recent forms of fertilizers and their use to improve nutrient use efficiency and to minimize environmental impacts. Int J Pure App Biosci 5:858–863.  https://doi.org/10.18782/2320-7051.2739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. United Nations (2017) World population prospects: the 2017 revision, methodology of the United Nations population estimates and Projections. New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. Vollaro M, Galioto F, Viaggi D (2016) The circular economy and agriculture: new opportunities for re-using phosphorus as fertilizer. Bio-based Appl Econ 5:267Google Scholar
  47. World Health Organization (2005) WHO Air quality guidelines for particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen dioxide and sulphur dioxide. Global Update 2005. Summary of risk assessment. World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francisca Maria Santos
    • 1
  • José Carlos Magalhães Pires
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.LEPABE – Laboratory for Process Engineering, Environment, Biotechnology and Energy, Faculty of EngineeringUniversity of PortoPortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations