Advertisement

Applications in Gynecology

  • Andrea PapadiaEmail author
  • Junjie Wang
  • Maria Luisa Gasparri
  • Anda Petronela Radan
  • Jarmila Anna Zdanowicz
  • Michael D. Mueller
Chapter
  • 23 Downloads

Abstract

Indocyanine green (ICG) is a fluorescent dye developed during World War II by Kodak. Initially meant to be employed in photography, it was granted FDA approval in 1959, after being tested in the United States at Mayo Clinic.

Ever since, its use via intravenous injection has found application in ophthalmology, but also in internal medicine and cardiology. In the last decades, ICG has been successfully employed in oncological surgery.

The main advantages, which led to a rapid acceptance of the compound, are the low rate of adverse effects and the rapid excretion, the presence of peak absorption around 800 nm, close to the isobestic point of hemoglobin. This allows the employment of ICG with near infrared light (NIR) for in vivo detection of tissue, with virtually no interference from background autofluorescence caused by water and blood, and excellent applicability in minimally invasive surgery. Indocyanine green has a half-life of around 3 min and is excreted almost exclusively through the bile.

Keywords

Indocyanine green Near infrared Sentinel lymph node mapping Endometrial cancer Cervical cancer Vulvar cancer 

Supplementary material

Video 31.1

Laparoscopic ICG SLN mapping after cervical injection. ICG SLN mapping is performed in an endometrial cancer patient with a BMI of 35 kg/m2. After cervical injection, the retroperitoneal space in the right hemipelvis is opened and developed bluntly. Under NIR light, a fluorescent signal is identified. Through the closing of the optical diaphragm, the fluorescent signal becomes more dense and can therefore be seen better. Lateral to the uterus, a lymphatic channel running along the uterine vessels and leading to an SLN in the obturator fossa is identified. This represents the upper paracervical pathway. The fluorescent signal is identified and followed under NIR light, whereas the dissection is performed under direct light. Care must be payed not to disrupt the lymphatic vessels. This would allow the ICG lo leave the lymphatic vessels and would cause a diffuse stain of the fluorescent signal. (AVI 87049 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Papadia A, Imboden S, Siegenthaler F, et al. Laparoscopic indocyanine green sentinel lymph node mapping in endometrial cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:2206–11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alander JT, Kaartinen IL, Laakso A, et al. A review of indocyanine green fluorescent imaging in surgery. Int J Biomed Imaging. 2012;2012:940585.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gasparri ML, Mueller MD, Papadia A. Instead of feeling blue, go green! Lancet Oncol. 2018;19:1273–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Scott P, Optical absorption of Indocyanine green. Oregon Medical Laser Center. https://omlc.org/spectra/icg/.
  5. 5.
    Cabanas RM. An approach for the treatment of penile carcinoma. Cancer. 1977 Feb;39(2):456–66.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Papadia A, Gasparri ML, Buda A, Mueller MD. Sentinel lymph node mapping in endometrial cancer: comparison of fluorescence dye with traditional radiocolloid and blue. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2017;143:2039–48.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432–017–2501–8. PubMed PMID: 28828528.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Papadia A, Remorgida V, Salom EM, et al. Laparoscopic pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy in gynecologic oncology. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2004;11:297–306.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rossi EC, Kowalski LD, Scalici J, et al. A comparison of sentinel lymph node biopsy to lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer staging (FIRES trial): a multicentre, prospective, cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18:384–92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hope-Ross M, Yannuzzi LA, Gragoudas ES, et al. Adverse reactions due to indocyanine green. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:529–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Papadia A, Mohr S, Imboden S, et al. Laparoscopic indocyanine green sentinel lymph node mapping in pregnant cervical cancer patients. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016;1:270–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Buda A, Elisei F, Palazzi S, et al. Quality of care for cervical and endometrial cancer patients: the impact of different techniques of sentinel lymph node mapping on patient satisfaction. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:2975–81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Papadia A, Gasparri ML, Wang J, et al. Sentinel Node biopsy for treatment of endometrial cancer. State of the art. Minerva Ginecol. 2019;71:25–35.  https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026–4784.18.04337-X. PMID: 30318882.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Uterine neoplasms. Version 2. 2018. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/uterine.pdf. Accessed 7 Aug 2018).
  14. 14.
    Colombo N, Creutzberg C, Amant F, et al. ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO consensus conference on endometrial cancer: diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2016;27:16–41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Daraï E, Dubernard G, Bats AS, et al. Sentinel node biopsy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer: long-term results of the SENTI-ENDO study. Gynecol Oncol. 2015;136:54–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Barlin JN, Khoury-Collado F, Kim CH, et al. The importance of applying a sentinel lymph node mapping algorithm in endometrial cancer staging: beyond removal of blue nodes. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;125:531–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Buda A, Papadia A, et al. From conventional radiotracer Tc-99(m) with blue dye to indocyanine green fluorescence: a comparison of methods towards optimization of sentinel lymph node mapping in early stage cervical cancer for a laparoscopic approach. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:1959–65.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cormier B, Diaz JP, Shih K, et al. Establishing a sentinel lymph node mapping algorithm for the treatment of early cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;122:275–80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Diaz JP, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in the management of early-stage cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;120:347–52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Van der Zee AG, Oonk MH, De Hullu JA, et al. Sentinel node dissection is safe in the treatment of early-stage vulvar cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:884–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Levenback CF, Ali S, Coleman RL, et al. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in women with squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva: a gynecologic oncology group study. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:884–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Uccella S, Gisone B, Stevenazzi G, et al. Laparoscopic sentinel node detection with ICG for early ovarian cancer: Description of a technique and literature review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018;221:193–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Papadia A, Zapardiel I, Bussi B, Ghezzi F, Ceccaroni M, De Ponti E, Elisei F, Imboden S, de la Noval BD, Gasparri ML, Di Martino G, De Santiago J, Mueller M, Vecchione F, Dell’Orto F, Buda A. Sentinel lymph node mapping in patients with stage I endometrial carcinoma: a focus on bilateral mapping identification by comparing radiotracer Tc99m with blue dye versus indocyanine green fluorescent dye. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2017;143:475–80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Martinelli F, Ditto A, Signorelli M, Bogani G, Chiappa V, Lorusso D, Scaffa C, Recalcati D, Perotto S, Haeusler E, Raspagliesi F. Sentinel node mapping in endometrial cancer following Hysteroscopic injection of tracers: a single center evaluation over 200 cases. Gynecol Oncol. 2017;146:525–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Martinelli F, Ditto A, Bogani G, Signorelli M, Chiappa V, Lorusso D, Haeusler E, Raspagliesi F. Laparoscopic sentinel node mapping in endometrial cancer after hysteroscopic injection of indocyanine green. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017;24:89–93.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ditto A, Martinelli F, Bogani G, Papadia A, Lorusso D, Raspagliesi F. Sentinel node mapping using hysteroscopic injection of indocyanine green and laparoscopic near-infrared fluorescence imaging in endometrial cancer staging. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015;22:132–3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rossi EC, Jackson A, Ivanova A, Boggess JF. Detection of sentinel nodes for endometrial cancer with robotic assisted fluorescence imaging: cervical versus hysteroscopic injection. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2013;23:1704–11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Geppert B, Lönnerfors C, Bollino M, Arechvo A, Persson J. A study on uterine lymphatic anatomy for standardization of pelvic sentinel lymph node detection in endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2017;145:256–61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Persson J, Geppert B, Lönnerfors C, Bollino M, Måsbäck A. Description of a reproducible anatomically based surgical algorithm for detection of pelvic sentinel lymph nodes in endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2017;147:120–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Querleu D, Morrow CP. Classification of radical hysterectomy. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:297–303.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Greene FL, Page DL, Irvin D, et al. AJCC cancer staging manual. 6th ed. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2003. p. 223–40.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Frumovitz M, Plante M, Lee PS, Sandadi S, Lilja JF, Escobar PF, Gien LT, Urbauer DL, Abu-Rustum NR. Near-infrared fluorescence for detection of sentinel lymph nodes in women with cervical and uterine cancers (FILM): a randomised, phase 3, multicentre, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19:1394–403.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Buda A, Papadia A, Di Martino G, Imboden S, Bussi B, Guerra L, De Ponti E, Reato C, Gasparri ML, Crivellaro C, Mueller M. Real-time fluorescent sentinel lymph node mapping with indocyanine green in women with previous conization undergoing laparoscopic surgery for early invasive cervical cancer: comparison with radiotracer ± blue dye. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018;25:455–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Di Martino G, Crivellaro C, De Ponti E, Bussi B, Papadia A, Zapardiel I, Vizza E, Elisei F, Diestro MD, Locatelli L, Gasparri ML, Di Lorenzo P, Mueller M, Buda A. Indocyanine green versus radiotracer with or without blue dye for sentinel lymph node mapping in stage >IB1 cervical cancer (>2 cm). J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017;24:954–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Holloway RW, Bravo RA, Rakowski JA, James JA, Jeppson CN, Ingersoll SB, Ahmad S. Detection of sentinel lymph nodes in patients with endometrial cancer undergoing robotic-assisted staging: a comparison of colorimetric and fluorescence imaging. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;126:25–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Papadia A, Buda A, Gasparri ML, Di Martino G, Bussi B, Verri D, Mueller MD. The impact of different doses of indocyanine green on the sentinel lymph-node mapping in early stage endometrial cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2018;144:2187–91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Imboden S, Papadia A, Nauwerk M, McKinnon B, Kollmann Z, Mohr S, Lanz S, Mueller MD. A comparison of radiocolloid and indocyanine green fluorescence imaging, sentinel lymph node mapping in patients with cervical cancer undergoing laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:4198–203.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Mariani A, Dowdy SC, Cliby WA, Gostout BS, Jones MB, Wilson TO, Podratz KC. Prospective assessment of lymphatic dissemination in endometrial cancer: a paradigm shift in surgical staging. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;109:11–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kumar S, Podratz KC, Bakkum-Gamez JN, Dowdy SC, Weaver AL, McGree ME, Cliby WA, Keeney GL, Thomas G, Mariani A. Prospective assessment of the prevalence of pelvic, paraaortic and high paraaortic lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;132:38–43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Buda A, Dell’Anna T, Vecchione F, Verri D, Di Martino G, Milani R. Near-infrared sentinel lymph node mapping with indocyanine green using the VITOM II ICG exoscope for open surgery for gynecologic malignancies. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016;23:628–32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Martínez-Palones JM, Pérez-Benavente MA, Gil-Moreno A, Díaz-Feijoo B, Roca I, García-Jiménez A, Aguilar-Martínez I, Xercavins J. Comparison of recurrence after vulvectomy and lymphadenectomy with and without sentinel node biopsy in early stage vulvar cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;103:865–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ruscito I, Gasparri ML, Braicu EI, Bellati F, Raio L, Sehouli J, Mueller MD, Panici PB, Papadia A. Sentinel node mapping in cervical and endometrial cancer: indocyanine green versus other conventional dyes-a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:3749–56.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ouldamer L, Bendifallah S, Body G, et al. Call for surgical nodal staging in women with ESMO/ESGO/ESTRO high-intermediate risk endometrial cancer: a multicentre cohort analysis from the FRANCOGYN Study Group. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24:1660–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Papadia A, Gasparri ML, Siegenthaler F, et al. FIGO stage IIIC endometrial cancer identification among patients with complex atypical hyperplasia, grade 1 and 2 endometrioid endometrial cancer: laparoscopic indocyanine green sentinel lymph node mapping versus frozen section of the uterus, why get around the problem? J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2017;143:491–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Sinno AK, Peijnenburg E, Fader AN, et al. Reducing overtreatment: a comparison of lymph node assessment strategies for endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2016;143:281–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Eriksson AG, Ducie J, Ali N, et al. Comparison of a sentinel lymph node and a selective lymphadenectomy algorithm in patients with endometrioid endometrial carcinoma and limited myometrial invasion. Gynecol Oncol. 2016;140:394–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Buda A, Di Martino G, Restaino S, De Ponti E, Monterossi G, Giuliani D, Ercoli A, Dell’Orto F, Dinoi G, Grassi T, Scambia G, Fanfani F. The impact on survival of two different staging strategies in apparent early stage endometrial cancer comparing sentinel lymph nodes mapping algorithm and selective lymphadenectomy: an Italian retrospective analysis of two reference centers. Gynecol Oncol. 2017;147:528–34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Tax C, Rovers MM, de Graaf C, Zusterzeel PLM, Bekkers RLM. The sentinel node procedure in early stage cervical cancer, taking the next step; a diagnostic review. Gynecol Oncol. 2015;139:559–67.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Salvo G, Ramirez PT, Levenback CF, Munsell MF, Euscher ED, Soliman PT, Frumovitz M. Sensitivity and negative predictive value for sentinel lymph node biopsy in women with early-stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2017;145:96–101.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Bats AS, Mathevet P, Buenerd A, Orliaguet I, Mery E, Zerdoud S, Le Frère-Belda MA, Froissart M, Querleu D, Martinez A, Leblanc E, Morice P, Daraï E, Marret H, Gillaizeau F, Lécuru F. The sentinel node technique detects unexpected drainage pathways and allows nodal ultrastaging in early cervical cancer: insights from the multicenter prospective SENTICOL study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:413–22.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    De Cicco C, Sideri M, Bartolomei M, Grana C, Cremonesi M, Fiorenza M, Maggioni A, Bocciolone L, Mangioni C, Colombo N, Paganelli G. Sentinel node biopsy in early vulvar cancer. Br J Cancer. 2000;82:295–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Levenback CF, Ali S, Coleman RL, Gold MA, Fowler JM, Judson PL, Bell MC, De Geest K, Spirtos NM, Potkul RK, Leitao MM Jr, Bakkum-Gamez JN, Rossi EC, Lentz SS, Burke JJ 2nd, Van Le L, Trimble CL. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in women with squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva: a gynecologic oncology group study. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:3786–91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Covens A, Vella ET, Kennedy EB, Reade CJ, Jimenez W, Le T. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in vulvar cancer: systematic review, meta-analysis and guideline recommendations. Gynecol Oncol. 2015;137:351–61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Van der Zee AG, Oonk MH, De Hullu JA, Ansink AC, Vergote I, Verheijen RH, Maggioni A, Gaarenstroom KN, Baldwin PJ, Van Dorst EB, Van der Velden J, Hermans RH, van der Putten H, Drouin P, Schneider A, Sluiter WJ. Sentinel node dissection is safe in the treatment of early-stage vulvar cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:884–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Papadia A, Gasparri ML, Mueller MD. Are allergic reactions to indocyanine green really that uncommon? A single institution experience. Obstet Gynecol Rep. 2017;1:1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Papadia A, Imboden S, Gasparri ML, et al. Endometrial and cervical cancer patients with multiple sentinel lymph nodes at laparoscopic ICG mapping: How many are enough? J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2016;142:1831–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    McCulloch P, Altman DG, Campbell WB, Flum DR, Glasziou P, Marshall JC, Nicholl J, Balliol Collaboration, Aronson JK, Barkun JS, Blazeby JM, Boutron IC, Campbell WB, Clavien PA, Cook JA, Ergina PL, Feldman LS, Flum DR, Maddern GJ, Nicholl J, Reeves BC, Seiler CM, Strasberg SM, Meakins JL, Ashby D, Black N, Bunker J, Burton M, Campbell M, Chalkidou K, Chalmers I, de Leval M, Deeks J, Ergina PL, Grant A, Gray M, Greenhalgh R, Jenicek M, Kehoe S, Lilford R, Littlejohns P, Loke Y, Madhock R, McPherson K, Meakins J, Rothwell P, Summerskill B, Taggart D, Tekkis P, Thompson M, Treasure T, Trohler U, Vandenbroucke J. No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. Lancet. 2009;374:1105–12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrea Papadia
    • 1
    Email author
  • Junjie Wang
    • 2
  • Maria Luisa Gasparri
    • 3
  • Anda Petronela Radan
    • 4
  • Jarmila Anna Zdanowicz
    • 4
  • Michael D. Mueller
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyOspedale Regionale di Lugano, Ente Ospedialiero Cantonale, Svizzera ItalianaLuganoSwitzerland
  2. 2.Department of Gynaecological OncologyKK Women’s & Children’s HospitalSingaporeSingapore
  3. 3.Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics“Sapienza” University of RomeRomeItaly
  4. 4.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity Hospital of Bern and University of BernBernSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations