Advertisement

Influence of the Prediction Model Complexity on the Performance of Model Predictive Anti-jerk Control for On-board Electric Powertrains

  • Alessandro ScamarcioEmail author
  • Mathias Metzler
  • Patrick Gruber
  • Aldo Sorniotti
Conference paper
  • 5 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

Anti-jerk controllers compensate for the torsional oscillations of automotive drivetrains, caused by swift variations of the traction torque. In the literature model predictive control (MPC) technology has been applied to anti-jerk control problems, by using a variety of prediction models. However, an analysis of the influence of the prediction model complexity on anti-jerk control performance is still missing. To cover the gap, this study proposes six anti-jerk MPC formulations, which are based on different prediction models and are fine-tuned through a unified optimization routine. Their performance is assessed over multiple tip-in and tip-out maneuvers by means of an objective indicator. Results show that: (i) low number of prediction steps and short discretization time provide the best performance in the considered nominal tip-in test; (ii) the consideration of the drivetrain backlash in the prediction model is beneficial in all test cases; (iii) the inclusion of tire slip formulations makes the system more robust with respect to vehicle speed variations and enhances the vehicle behavior in tip-out tests; however, it deteriorates performance in the other scenarios; and (iv) the inclusion of a simplified tire relaxation formulation does not bring any particular benefit.

Keywords

Model predictive control Anti-jerk control Electric vehicle On-board powertrain 

References

  1. 1.
    Bottiglione, F., Sorniotti, A., Shead, L.: The effect of half-shaft torsion dynamics on the performance of a traction control system for electric vehicles. J. Automob. Eng. 226(9), 1145–1159 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sorniotti, A.: Driveline modeling, experimental validation and evaluation of the influence of the different parameters on the overall system dynamics. SAE Technical Paper 2008-01-0632 (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lu, X., Chen, H., Zhang, H., Wang, P., Gao, B.: Design of model predictive controller for anti-jerk during tip-in/out process of vehicles. In: 30th Chinese Control Conference (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhang, T., Huang, Y., Dai, P., Hao, D.: MPC controller design for low frequency vehicle longitudinal vibration suppression. In: 2nd International Conference on Control, Automation and Artificial Intelligence (2017)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lagerberg, A., Egardt, B.: Model predictive control of automotive powertrains with backlash. In: IFAC Proceedings – 6th Triennial World Congress (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Batra, M., McPhee, J., Azad, N.: Real-time model predictive anti-jerk traction control of connected electric vehicles. Veh. Syst. Dyn. 57, 1720–1743 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Batra, M., Maitland, A., McPhee, J., Azad, N.: Non-linear model predictive anti-jerk cruise control for electric vehicles with slip-based constraints. In: American Control Conference (2018)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Giangiulio, E., Arosio, D.: New validated tire model to be used for ABS and VDC simulations. In: 3rd International Colloquium on Vehicle-Tire-Road Interaction (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    De Novellis, L., Sorniotti, A., Gruber, P., Orus, J., Rodriguez, J.M., Theunissen, J., De Smet, J.: Direct yaw moment control actuated through electric drivetrains and friction brakes: theoretical design and experimental assessment. Mechatronics 26, 1–15 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wächter, A., Biegler, L.T.: On the implementation of an interior-point filter line-search algorithm for large-scale nonlinear programming. Math. Program. 106(1), 25–57 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tavernini, D., Metzler, M., Gruber, P., Sorniotti, A.: Explicit non-linear model predictive control for electric vehicle traction control. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 47(4), 1438–1451 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of SurreyGuildfordUK

Personalised recommendations