Advertisement

Coordinated Control of Slip Prevention and Energy Management for Four-Wheel-Drive Hybrid Electric Vehicles

  • Jingni Yuan
  • Lin YangEmail author
  • Yixin Yang
Conference paper
  • 6 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

For a hybrid electric vehicle (HEV), traction control ensures vehicle safety while energy management improves the fuel efficiency. Since the two strategies both control the torque distribution, the coordination between them is necessary. Therefore, a multi-objective optimization strategy is proposed to concurrently optimize the dynamic performance, slip rate and energy consumption of an HEV. First, an improved vehicle speed estimation method based on the characteristics of the adhesion curves is proposed to accurately estimate the vehicle speed and slip rate. Second, the Gaussian process regression is introduced to identify the tire model and extract the global features of the adhesion curve. Finally, the multi-objective optimization problem is proposed and solved by the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution. The strategy outputs torque distribution between the engine, the motor and the brakes. The simulation results show that the proposed strategy can reduce the slip times compared with sliding mode control. Meanwhile, the energy economy is improved because the additional energy consumption caused by slip control is reduced.

Keywords

Coordinated control Energy management Wheel slip prevention 

References

  1. 1.
    Yim, S., Choi, J., Yi, K.: Coordinated control of hybrid 4WD vehicles for enhanced maneuverability and lateral stability. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 61, 1946–1950 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2012.2188921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ivanov, V., Savitski, D., Shyrokau, B.: A survey of traction control and antilock braking systems of full electric vehicles with individually controlled electric motors. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 64, 3878–3896 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2014.2361860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yu, H., Taheri, S., Duan, J., Qi, Z.: An integrated cooperative antilock braking control of regenerative and mechanical system for a hybrid electric vehicle based on intelligent tire. Asian J. Control 18, 55–68 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1002/asjc.1154MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kumar, C.N., Subramanian, S.C.: Cooperative control of regenerative braking and friction braking for a hybrid electric vehicle. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. D J. Automob. Eng. 230, 103–116 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1177/0954407015581082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tanelli, M., Savaresi, S.M., Cantoni, C.: Longitudinal vehicle speed estimation for traction and braking control systems. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Control Applications, pp. 2790–2795 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1109/cacsd-cca-isic.2006.4777080
  6. 6.
    Rasmussen, C.E., Williams, C.K.I.: Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129065704001899CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen, L., Bian, M., Luo, Y., Li, K.: Real-time identification of the tyre-road friction coefficient using an unscented Kalman filter and mean-square-error-weighted fusion. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part D J. Automob. Eng. 230, 788–802 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1177/0954407015595725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chu, W., Luo, Y., Dai, Y., Li, K.: In-wheel motor electric vehicle state estimation by using unscented particle filter. Int. J. Veh. Des. 67, 115 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1504/IJVD.2015.068134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gamerman, D., Lopes, H.F.: Markov Chain Monte Carlo - Stochastic Simulation for Bayesian Inference. Chapman and Hall/CRC (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1360/zd-2013-43-6-1064
  10. 10.
    Li, J., Song, Z., Shuai, Z., Xu, L., Ouyang, M.: Wheel slip control using sliding-mode technique and maximum transmissible torque estimation. J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Contr. 137, 111010 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4031056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Triantaphyllou, E.: Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study. Springer, Boston (2002)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Serrao, L., Onori, S., Rizzoni, G.: A comparative analysis of energy management strategies for hybrid electric vehicles. J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Contr. 133, 031012 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4003267CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Shanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Xi’an Jiaotong UniversityXi’anChina

Personalised recommendations