Advertisement

The Significance of Roll on the Dynamics of Ground Vehicles Subjected to Crosswind Gusts by Two-Way Coupled Simulation of Aero- and Vehicle Dynamics

  • Tural TunayEmail author
  • Ciarán J. O’Reilly
  • Lars Drugge
Conference paper
  • 9 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

Improvements in vehicle technologies in recent decades enable the use of lighter materials and the development of control systems for autonomous vehicles. However, these improvements lead to a need for better understanding of how flow phenomena affect crosswind stability of ground vehicles which will enable the design of the less wind-sensitive vehicles. Therefore, the present study investigates the significance of roll on the dynamics of ground vehicles subjected to crosswind gusts. It includes a multidisciplinary approach in which there is a two-way coupled simulation between aerodynamics and vehicle dynamics equations. As a result of the investigations, significant differences have been found between the computations considering no-roll and roll motions.

Keywords

Ground vehicle aerodynamics Vehicle dynamics Crosswind IDDES Roll motion 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank the Centre for ECO2 Vehicle Design at KTH, funded by the Swedish Innovation Agency Vinnova (Grant Numbers 2016-05195 and 2017-03391); and the strategic research area TRENoP for their financial contributions to this work. The computations were performed on resources provided by the Swedish National Infrastructure for Computing (SNIC) at the PDC Center for High Performance Computing (PDC-HPC).

References

  1. 1.
    Sims-Williams, D.: Cross winds and transients: reality, simulation and effects. SAE Int. J. Passeng. Cars Mech. Syst. 4(1), 172–183 (2011). SAE Paper No. 2011-01-0172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Choi, H., Lee, J., Park, H.: Aerodynamics of heavy vehicles. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 46, 441–68 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-011212-140616MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carbonne, L., Winkler, N., Efraimsson, G.: Use of full coupling of aerodynamics and vehicle dynamics for numerical simulation of the crosswind stability ground vehicles. SAE Int. J. Commer. Veh. 9(2), 359–370 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-8148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Theissen, P.: Unsteady Vehicle Aerodynamics in Gusty Crosswind. PhD thesis, Technische Universität München (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Li, S., Gu, Z., Huang, T., Chen, Z., Liu, J.: Coupled analysis of vehicle stability in crosswind on low adhesion road. Int. J. Numer. Methods Heat Fluid Flow 28(8), 1956–1972 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1108/HFF-01-2018-0013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nakasato, K., Tsubokura, M., Ikaeda, J., Onishi, K., Ota, S., Takase, H., Akasaka, K., Ihara, H., Oshima, M., Araki, T.: Coupled 6DoF motion and aerodynamic crosswind simulation incorporating driver model. SAE Int. J. Passeng. Cars Mech. Syst. 10(2), 662–670 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.4271/2017-01-1525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Huang, T., Gu, Z., Feng, C., Zeng, W.: Transient aerodynamics simulations of a road vehicle in the crosswind condition coupled with the vehicle’s motion. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part D J. Automob. Eng. 232(5), 583–598 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1177/0954407017704609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Huang, T.M., Gu, Z.Q., Feng, C.J.: Coupled analysis of unsteady aerodynamics and vehicle motion of a passenger car in crosswind condition. J. Appl. Fluid Mech. 10(2), 625–637 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.18869/acadpub.jafm.73.239.26639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Forbes, D.C., Page, G.J., Passmore, M.A., Gaylard, A.P.: A fully coupled, 6 degree-of-freedom, aerodynamic and vehicle handling crosswind simulation using the DrivAer model. SAE Int. J. Passeng. Cars Mech. Syst. 9(2), 710–722 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-1601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Winkler, N., Drugge, L., Trigell, A.S., Efraimsson, G.: Coupling aerodynamics to vehicle dynamics in transient crosswinds including a driver model. Comput. Fluids 138, 26–34 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2016.08.006MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ishioka, H., Onishi, K., Nakasato, K., Nakashima, T., Tsubokura, M.: Coupled 6 Dof motion and aerodynamics simulation of road vehicles in crosswind gusts. In: 33rd AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, AIAA AVIATION Forum, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Dallas, TX, 22–26 June 2015 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2015-3308
  12. 12.
    Nakashima, T., Tsubokura, M., Vazquez, M., Owen, H., Doi, Y.: Coupled analysis of unsteady aerodynamics and vehicle motion of a road vehicle in windy conditions. Comput. Fluids 80, 1–9 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2012.09.028CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yakub, F., Mori, Y.: Enhancing the stability of unmanned ground sport utility vehicles through coordinated control under MU-split and gust of wind. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. 11(10), 1450–1469 (2016)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Trigell, A.S., Rothhämel, M., Pauwelussen, J., Kural, K.: Advanced vehicle dynamics of heavy trucks with the perspective of road safety. Veh. Syst. Dyn. 55(10), 1572–1617 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2017.1319964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lee, S., Kasahara, M., Mori, Y.: Roll damping control of a heavy vehicle under the strong crosswind. In: 7th IFAC Symposium on Advances in Automotive Control, The International Federation of Automatic Control, Tokyo, Japan, 4–7 September 2013, pp. 219–224 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.3182/20130904-4-JP-2042.00053
  16. 16.
    Gutierrez, W.T., Hassan, B., Croll, R.H., Rutledge, W.H.: Aerodynamics overview of the ground transportation systems (GTS) project for heavy vehicle drag reduction. In: 1996 SAE International Congress and Exposition, Detroit, Michigan, 26–29 February 1996 (1996)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Storms, B.L., Ross, J.C., Heineck, J.T., Walker S.M., Driver, D.M., Zilliac, G.G.: An experimental study of the ground transportation system (GTS) model in the NASA Ames 7-by 10-ft wind tunnel. NASA TM-2001-209621 (2001)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Solmaz, S., Corless, M., Shorten, R.: A methodolgy for the design of robust rollover prevention controllers for automotive vehicles with active steering. Int. J. Control 80, 1763–1779 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1080/00207170701473987CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tural Tunay
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Ciarán J. O’Reilly
    • 1
    • 2
  • Lars Drugge
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Engineering MechanicsKTH Royal Institute of TechnologyStockholmSweden
  2. 2.The Centre for ECO2 Vehicle Design at KTHStockholmSweden
  3. 3.Faculty of Engineering, Department of Mechanical EngineeringAdana Alparslan Turkes Science and Technology UniversityAdanaTurkey

Personalised recommendations