Safe Train Route Options

  • Vladimir Popov
  • Philipp Sukhov
  • Julia BolandovaEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1116)


Constantly increasing anthropogenic pressure on the environment inevitably leads to climate change, which in turn provokes an increase in the number of extreme weather events. Extreme weather conditions can leads to industrial accidents and disasters. This statement is confirmed by statistics on road accidents initiated by natural disasters on the roads of the Russian Federation, the USA and Europe. The transportation of dangerous goods in extreme weather conditions is a dangerous factor to shippers, rail carriers and society. This risk factor cannot be quantified and is not adequately presented in the cost of transportation.

Accident risk factors assessment that consider the impact of various types of natural weather disasters and quantitative assessment of the impact on railway infrastructure, can be a starting point for managing disaster risks and adapting human activities to an ever-changing climate. This article proposes a methodology for assessing the risk of a traffic accident considering the impact of various types of natural disasters. As a result of testing this method, the risk of a dangerous goods traffic accident at two North Caucasus Railway routes, after simulation was selected the safest route. For carriers of dangerous goods, the accident risk assessment method will allow you to choose the safest route for the transportation of goods and, as a result, reduce the chanse of an accident.


Emergency risk Emergency situations Railway transport Emergency situations of natural character Freight railway transportation Traffic safety 


  1. 1.
    Report on climate risks in the territory of the Russian Federation. Ed. St. Petersburg, p. 106 (2017)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ragozin, A.L.: Assessment and management of natural risks: thematic volume. - M.: Publishing company “CROOK”, p. 320 (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Akimov, V.A., Lesnykh, V.V., et al.: Fundamentals of risk analysis and management in natural and technogenic spheres. - M.: Business Express, p. 352 (2004).
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    Branscomb, L.M.: Rail Transportation of Toxic Inhalation Hazards Policy Responses to the Safety and Security Externality. HARVARD Kennedy School (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    AAR, “Mandatory HAZMAT Rerouting”Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Han, L.D., Chin, S., et al.: A tool for railroad hazmat routing under shipment bans in major cities. In: Proceedings of the 85th TRB Annual Meetings CD. Paper 06-1790, Washington, DC (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Han, L.D., Chin, S., et al.: A Tool for Railroad HAZMAT RoutingGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Glickman, T., Erkut, E., et al.: The cost and risk impacts of rerouting railroad shipments of hazardous materials. Accid. Anal. Prev. 35(5), 10151025 (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Thompson, R.E., Zamejc, E.R., et al.: Hazardous Materials Car Placement in a Train Consist. Review and Analysis, Report, vol. 1, DOT/FRA/ORD/18.I. Washington, D.C.: Federal Railroad Administration, U.S. DOT (1992)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Popov, V.G., Sukhov, F.I., et al.: Assessment of emergency risk in the movement of trains as a result of the impact of natural disasters occurring in the environment. J. Sci. Technol. Transp. 4, 115–120 (2018)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Glickman, T., Erkut, E., et al.: The cost and risk impacts of rerouting railroad shipments of hazardous materialsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Russian University of Transport (MIIT)MoscowRussian Federation

Personalised recommendations