Advertisement

A Two-Regime Performance Test of the Mexican Public Pension Funds (SIEFOREs)

  • Oscar V. De la Torre-Torres
  • Evaristo Galeana-Figueroa
  • Dora Aguilasocho-Montoya
Chapter
  • 14 Downloads

Abstract

In the present chapter, we measure the performance of the four types of SIEFOREs and their corresponding performance indices in a two-regime scenario. With the use of Markov-switching models, we found that the historical prices and performance of the SIEFOREs can be modeled with a two-regime geometric Brownian motion stochastic process, and we found that the conventional net-return index measured by CONSAR (the official authority in the pension system) is not sufficient for informational purposes. With our tests, we found that the good performers are not that good in crisis time periods, given the risk exposure with their management. Also, we found that some middle-table performers are the best in a two-regime scenario. With our results, we proved that it is preferable to measure performance in a two-regime scenario in order to increase informational efficiency among pension savers.

Keywords

Pension funds Pension fund performance Markov-switching models Portfolio back test and simulation SIEFORE 

References

  1. Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, 716–723.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CUB.2017.09.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albo, A., González, F., Hernández, O., et al. (2007). Hacia el fortalecimiento de los sistemas de pensiones en México. BBVA-Research. http://www.bbvaresearch.com/KETD/fbin/mult/Haciaelfortalecimientodelossistemasdepensionesenmex_tcm346-189743.pdf?ts=1642013. Accessed 3 Feb 2012.
  3. Alexander, C., & Kaeck, A. (2007). Regime dependent determinants of credit default swap spreads. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32, 1008–1021.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2007.08.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alexander, C., & Lazar, E. (2008). Markov Switching GARCH Diffusion (No. 44). ICMA Centre Discussion Papers in Finance 2008-01 (Vol. 44). Reading. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Carol_Alexander/publication/46455390_Markov_Switching_GARCH_Diffusion/links/0f31752ff4a9e86a7c000000/Markov-Switching-GARCH-Diffusion.pdf.
  5. Bodie, Z., Merton, R. C., & Samuelson, W. F. (1992). Labor supply flexibility and portfolio choice in a life cycle model. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 16, 427–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brooks, C., & Persand, G. (2001). The trading profitability of forecasts of the gilt–equity yield ratio. International Journal of Forecasting, 17, 11–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Calderón-Colín, R., Domínguez, E. E., & Schwartz, M. J. (2009). Consumer confusion: The choice of pension fund manager in Mexico. Journal of Pension Economics & Finance, 9, 43–74.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474747209004004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chan-Lau, J. (2005). Pension funds in latinamerica. Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, 14, 107–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. CONSAR. (2017). Investment regime updated at 2017. In: Financial data. http://www.consar.gob.mx/gobmx/Aplicativo/Limites_Inversion/?lang=en. Accessed 3 September 2018.
  10. De la Torre Torres, O. V., Galeana, E., & Aguilasocho, D. (2015a). An actual position benchmark for Mexican pension funds performance. Economía: teoría y práctica, 43, 133–154.Google Scholar
  11. De la Torre Torres, O. V., Galeana, E., Martínez Torre-Enciso, M. I., & Aguilasocho, D. (2015b). A minimum variance benchmark to measure the performance of pension funds in Mexico. Contaduría y Administración, 60, 593–614.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cya.2015.05.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De la Torre Torres, O. V., Galeana Figueroa, E., & Alvarez-García, J. (2017). The cost of homogeneity in life cycle pension funds: An explanation to demand’s inelasticity of Mexican pension funds with a performance attribution test. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 24, 97–103. https://doir.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2017.11.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hamilton, J. D. (1989). A new approach to the economic analysis of nonstationary time series and the business cycle. Econometrica, 57, 357–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hamilton, J. D. (1990). Analysis of time series subject to changes in regime. Journal of Econometrics, 45, 39–70.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(90)90093-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hamilton, J. D. (1994). Time series analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hamilton, J. D. (1996). Specification testing in Markov-switching time-series models. Journal of Econometrics, 70, 127–157.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(69)41686-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hannan, E. J., & Quinn, B. G. (1979). The determination of the order of an autoregression. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 41, 190–195.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2985032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hauptmann, J., Hoppenkamps, A., Min, A., et al. (2014). Forecasting market turbulence using regime-switching models. Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, 28, 139–164.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11408-014-0226-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Martínez, M. R., & Venegas, F. (2014). Análisis del riesgo de mercado de los fondos de pensión en México un enfoque con modelos autorregresivos. Contaduría y Administración, 59, 165–195.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0186-1042(14)71269-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Merton, R. (1969). Lifetime portfolio selection under uncertainty: The continuous time case. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 51, 247–257.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1926560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rodriguez-Reyes, L. (2017). El manejo del riesgo de longevidad en los sistemas públicos de pensiones. Una propuesta de uso de swaps de longevidad para México. El Trimestre Económico, LXXXIV, 681–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Santillán, R., Martínez, M., & López, F. (2016). Análisis econométrico del riesgo y rendimiento de las SIEFORES. Revista Mexicana de Economía y finanzas, 11, 29–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6, 461–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sharpe, W. (1966). Mutual fund performance. Journal of Business, 39, 119–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Thomas, A., & Spataro, L. (2016). The effects of pension funds on markets performance: A review. Journal of Economic Surveys, 30, 1–33.  https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Villagomez, F. A. (2014). El ahorro para el retiro: Una reflexión para México. El Trimestre Económico, 81, 549–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Villagómez, F. A., & Hernández, I. (2009). Impacto de la reforma al sistema de pensiones en México sobre el ahorro. Economía Mexicana Nueva Época, XIX, 271–310.Google Scholar
  28. Villagómez, F. A., & Ramírez, G. D. (2014). Pensión universal proporcional. Una propuesta para México. El Trimestre Económico, LXXXI, 839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Oscar V. De la Torre-Torres
    • 1
  • Evaristo Galeana-Figueroa
    • 1
  • Dora Aguilasocho-Montoya
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Accounting and Management, Saint Nicholas and Hidalgo Michoacan State University (UMSNH)MoreliaMexico

Personalised recommendations