Advertisement

A Portrait of Contemporary Language Learners in Higher Education

  • Denyze ToffoliEmail author
Chapter
  • 11 Downloads
Part of the New Language Learning and Teaching Environments book series (NLLTE)

Abstract

In this final chapter, I will attempt to draw all of the prior discussions together into a new portrait of contemporary language learners in higher education. I will suggest new ways forward, in both learning and teaching, instructional design and research, starting from the composite terrain described above (Fig. 1 in Chapter  7). My attempt at profiling contemporary language learners in higher education will combine reflections on learning in an informal context with the learning in an institutional context that is the subject of Chapters  4 and  5. The following section will identify the junctions between the two, in order to take a more accurate look at the mechanisms that lead to the language development of contemporary learners in higher education.

References

  1. Block, D. (1999). Who framed SLA research? Problem framing and metaphoric accounts of the SLA research process. In L. Cameron & G. Low (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor (pp. 135–148). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Candas, P. (2009). Analyse de pratiques d’étudiants dans un centre de ressources de langues: Indicateurs d’autonomie dans l’apprentissage (Thèse de doctorat). Université de Strasbourg. http://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00943151.
  3. Cole, J. (2015). Foreign language learning in the age of the internet: A comparison of informal acquirers and traditional classroom learners in central Brazil (Doctoral thesis). University of Oxford, Oxford.Google Scholar
  4. Ellis, N. C. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), 143–188.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263102002024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ellis, N. C. (2015). Implicit AND explicit learning: Their dynamic interface and complexity. In P. Rebuschat (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 3–23). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  6. Eneau, J. (2005). La part d’autrui dans la formation de soi; Autonomie, Autoformation et Réciprocité en Contexte Organisationnel. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  7. Kusyk, M. (2017). Les dynamiques du développement de l’anglais au travers d’activités informelles en ligne: Une étude exploratoire auprès d’étudiants français et allemands (Thèse de doctorat). Pädagogische Hochschule Karlsruhe and Université de Strasbourg.Google Scholar
  8. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2018). Looking ahead: Future directions in, and future research into, second language acquisition. Foreign Language Annals, 51(1), 55–72.  https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Morin, E. (2005). Introduction à la pensée complexe. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  10. Narcy-Combes, J.-P., & Narcy-Combes, M.-F. (2000). Épistémologie et méthodologie de la recherche dans le secteur LANSAD: Qu’apporterait une harmonisation des pratiques? ASp. la revue du GERAS, 27–30, 243–251.  https://doi.org/10.4000/asp.2136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Rivens Mompean, A. (2013). Le Centre de Ressources en Langues: Vers la modélisation du dispositif d’apprentissage. Lille: Éditions du Septentrion. http://www.septentrion.com/en/livre/?GCOI=27574100883330.
  12. Rubin, J. (1975). What the “good language learner” can teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 9(1), 41–51.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3586011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sockett, G., & Toffoli, D. (2012). Beyond learner autonomy: A dynamic systems view of the informal learning of English in virtual online communities. ReCALL, 24(2), 138–151.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344012000031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Stern, H. H. (1975). What can we learn from the good language learner? Canadian Modern Language Review, 31(4), 304–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Toffoli, D. (2015). University students’ plurilingual profiles in a French fronier city: Similarities and differences between more and less plurilingual students. Language Learning in Higher Education, 5(1), 25–43.  https://doi.org/10.1515/cercles-2015-0002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Toffoli, D., El Khatib, S., Fierro-Porto, M., & Hamade, F. (2014). Rapport d’enquête sur les représentations étudiantes et l’apprentissage des langues à l’Université de Strasbourg (p. 41). Strasbourg: Université de Strasbourg.Google Scholar
  17. Toffoli, D., & Perrot, L. (2017). Autonomy, the online informal learning of english (OILE) and learning resource centers (LRCs): The relationships between learner autonomy, L2 proficiency, L2 autonomy and digital literacy. In M. Cappellini, T. Lewis, & A. Rivens Mompean (Eds.), Learner autonomy and web 2.0 (pp. 198–228). Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
  18. Toffoli, D., & Sockett, G. (2010). How non-specialist students of English practice informal learning using web 2.0 tools. ASp. La Revue Du GERAS, 58, 125–144.  https://doi.org/10.4000/asp.1851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Toffoli, D., & Sockett, G. (2013). University teachers’ perceptions of Online Informal Learning of English (OILE). Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(1), 7–21.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2013.776970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Toffoli, D., & Sockett, G. (2014). English language music: Does it help with learning? Recherche et Pratiques Pédagogiques en Langues de Spécialité. Cahiers de l’Apliut, XXXIII(2), 192–209.Google Scholar
  21. Toffoli, D., & Sockett, G. (2015). L’apprentissage informel de l’anglais en ligne (AIAL), qu’est-ce que ça change pour les centres de langues? Recherche et Pratiques Pédagogiques en Langues de Spécialité. Cahiers de l’Apliut, XXXIV(1). https://apliut.revues.org/5055.
  22. Toffoli, D., & Speranza, L. (2016). L’autonomie comme facteur déterminant dans la réussite d’un enseignement Lansad en sciences historiques. Recherche et pratiques pédagogiques en Langues de Spécialité. Cahiers de l’Apliut, 35(spécial 1).  https://doi.org/10.4000/apliut.5505.
  23. Trestini, M. (2016). Théorie des systèmes complexes appliquée à la modélisation d’environnements numériques d’apprentissage de nouvelle génération. Environnements Informatiques pour l’Apprentissage Humain (HDR, Université de Strasbourg). https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01432687.
  24. Vanderplank, R. (2016). Captioned media in foreign language learning and teaching: Subtitles for the deaf and hard-of-hearing as tools for language learning. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wilson Nelson, M. (1990). At the point of need. Heinemann Educational Books. http://www.goodreads.com/work/best_book/4591403-at-the-point-of-need-teaching-basic-and-esl-writers.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.LanSADUniversity of StrasbourgStrasbourgFrance

Personalised recommendations