Advertisement

Simplifying Electronic Testing Environment with SLAM Based Handheld Augmented Reality System

  • Carlos AriasEmail author
  • Andoni Arregi
  • Fabian Schriever
  • David Martinez Oliveira
Chapter
  • 47 Downloads
Part of the Progress in IS book series (PROIS)

Abstract

Current electronic testing measurements during embedded software development lack simultaneous multiple real-time measurements with location-specific information. To address this problem with a focus on electronic subsystem testing in the space industry an Augmented Reality (AR) solution is presented in form of a technology demonstrator. This Simultaneous Localization And Mapping (SLAM) system based on the Handheld Augmented Reality (HAR) concept provides an affordable zero-time installation augmented reality system that blends simultaneously multiple real-time measurements displayed exactly where they are measured. The system is composed of a handheld device and so-called Smart Probes, or miniature Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) devices attached electronically to the measured specimen. This system may, with further development, become an alternative to a multimeter, an oscilloscope, and a logic analyser.

Keywords

Handheld augmented reality (HAR) Smart probes SLAM Electronic measurement 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Development of this project has been funded by the European Space Agency under contract 4000122921/18/NL/GLC/as and is executed by GTD GmbH and JS Electronics in Germany. Mr. David Martinez Oliveira had a remarkable role as the Technical Officer on ESA’s side to whom the authors express their gratitude for all the ideas and insight he brought into the activity.

References

  1. Chartres, J., Sanchez, H., & Hanson, J. (2014). EDSN development lessons learned. In Proceedings of the AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites, Technical Session VI: Next on the Pad, SSC14-VI-7. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/smallsat/2014/NextPad/7/.
  2. Craig, A. B. (2013). Understanding augmented reality: Concepts and applications. Waltham: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
  3. Detrell, G., Keppler, J., Helisch, H., Martin, J., Belz, S., Henn, N., & Angerer, O. (2018). PBR@LSR Experiment—ready to fly. In 69th International Astronautical Congress (IAC 2018) Involving Everyone. International Astronautical Federation Bremen (pp. 505–509).Google Scholar
  4. ECSS. (2009). Project planning and implementation ECSS‐M‐ST‐10C. European Cooperation for Space Standardization. ESA Requirements and Standards Division.Google Scholar
  5. ECSS. (2017). Technology readiness level (TRL) guidelines ECSS-E-HB-11A. European Cooperation for Space Standardization. ESA Requirements and Standards Division. Retrieved from https://ecss.nl/home/ecss-e-hb-11a-technology-readiness-level-trl-guidelines-1-March-2017/.
  6. European Space Agency. (2014). Statement of work—Augmented reality for AIT, AIV and operations. Noordwijk: European Space Agency.Google Scholar
  7. Haapalainen, E., Kim, S., Forlizzi, J., & Dey, A. K. (2010). Psycho-physiological measures for assessing cognitive load. In UbiComp 2010: Ubiquitous Computing, 12th International Conference. Copenhagen: ACM (pp. 301–310).Google Scholar
  8. Höller, J., Tsiatsis, V., Mulligan, C., Karnouskos, S., Avesand, S., & Boyle, D. (2014). From machine-to-machine to the internet of things. Academic Press.Google Scholar
  9. IHS Markit. (2015). Smart Connected Major Appliance Market Report–2015. Retrieved from https://technology.ihs.com/549694.
  10. International Trade Centre. (2019). Market analysis and research section. Geneva, Switzerland. Retrieved from http://www.trademap.org/cbi/index.aspx?proceed=true&productgroup=24650.
  11. Markov-Vetter, D., Millberg, J., & Staadt, O. (2013). Mobile augmented reality for space operation procedures: A generic approach of authoring and guiding on-board payload activities. In 64th International Astronautical Congress 2013. Beijing: International Astronautical Federation (pp. 4542–4555).Google Scholar
  12. National Research Council. (2001). Embedded, everywhere—A research agenda for networked systems of embedded computers. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.  https://doi.org/10.17226/10193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Polvi, J., Kim, J., Taketomi, T., Goshiro, Y., Miyazaki, J., & Kato, H. (2013). User interface design of a SLAM-based handheld augmented reality work support system. IEICE technical report, 113, 119–124. Retrieved from https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/40019824941/en/.
  14. Rauschnabel, P. A., He, J., & Ro, Y. K. (2018). Antecedents to the adoption of augmented reality smart glasses: A closer look at privacy risks. Journal of Business Research, 92, 374–384.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.08.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ro, Y. K., Brem, A., & Rauschnabel, P. A. (2018). Augmented reality smart glasses: Definition, concepts and impact on firm value creation. Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality, Progress in IS, 169–181.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64027-3_12.
  16. Santos, M. C., Polvi, J., Taketomi, T., Yamamoto, C., Sandor, C., & Kato, H. (2014). A usability scale for handheld augmented reality. In 20th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology. Edinburg: ACM (pp. 167–176).  https://doi.org/10.1145/2671015.2671019.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carlos Arias
    • 1
    Email author
  • Andoni Arregi
    • 1
  • Fabian Schriever
    • 1
  • David Martinez Oliveira
    • 2
  1. 1.GTD GmbHMarkdorfGermany
  2. 2.European Space Agency, ESTECNoordwijkThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations