Advertisement

Digital Topographies. Using AR to Represent Archival Material in Urban Space

  • Sebastian PranzEmail author
  • Simon Nestler
  • Klaus Neuburg
Chapter
  • 18 Downloads
Part of the Progress in IS book series (PROIS)

Abstract

In this paper we discuss how Augmented Reality as a form of spatial computing can contribute to the concept of a “mediated city”, and tackle possible problems that we understand as conflicts between different modes of spatial perception. In reference to Spatial Sociology we assume that space includes a physical dimension as well as a social dimension and discuss a multidimensional framework to analyze AR applications. We argue that spatial computing provides a digital topography that creates new ways of understanding and orientation as well as multidimensional problems. As an example we present an immersive city tour we realized in Hamm, North Rhine-Westphalia in 2018 in collaboration with the city’s archive and the Ministry of Culture in NRW.

Keywords

Mediated city Augmented reality Spatial computing Location awareness Ubiquitous computing 

References

  1. Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6(4), 355–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Caudell, T. P., & Mizell, D. W. (1992). Augmented reality: An application of heads-up display technology to manual manufacturing processes. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (Vol. 2, pp. 659–669).Google Scholar
  3. Eckardt, F. (2009). Die komplexe Stadt. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Farman, J. (2010). Mapping the digital empire: Google Earth and the process of postmodern cartography. New Media & Society, 12(6), 869–888.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809350900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Goffman, E. (1986). Frame analysis. An essay on the organization of experience. Boston, Massachusetts: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Graham, M., & Zook, M. (2013). Augmented realities and uneven geographies: Exploring the geolinguistic contours of the web. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 45(1), 77–99. https://doi.org/10.1068/a44674.
  7. Halbwachs, M. (1992). On collective memory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. Hepp, A., Kubitschkom S., Marszolek, I. (2018). Einleitung: Die mediatisierte Stadt. In A. Hepp, S. Kubitschko, I. Marszolek (Eds.), Die mediatisierte Stadt. Medien • Kultur • Kommunikation (pp. 1–14). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
  9. Krueger, M. W., Gionfriddo, T., & Hinrichsen, K. (1985). VIDEOPLACE—An artificial reality. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, 16(4), 35–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Landesregierung Nordrhein-Westfalen. (1968). Entwicklungsprogramm Ruhr 1968–1973. Düsseldorf.Google Scholar
  11. Läpple, D. (1992). Essay über den Raum. Für ein gesellschaftswissenschaftliches Raumkonzept. In H. Häußermann, D. Ipsen, T. Krämer-Badoni, D. Läpple, M. Rodenstein, & W. Siebel (Eds.), Stadt und Raum—soziologische Analysen (S. 157–207). Pfaffenweiler: Centaurus.Google Scholar
  12. Löw, M. (2010). Stadt- und Raumsoziologie. In G. Kneer & M. Schroer (Eds.), Handbuch Spezielle Soziologien. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  13. Manovich, L. (2006). The poetics of augmented space. Visual Communication, 5(2), 219–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357206065527.
  14. Milgram, P., Takemura, H., Utsumi, A., & Kishino, F. (1995). Augmented reality: A class of displays on the reality-virtuality continuum. Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies, 2351, 282–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Popitz, H. (1986). Phänomene der Macht: Autorität–Herrschaft–Gewalt–Technik. Tübingen: Mohr/Siebeck.Google Scholar
  16. Pranz, S. (2018). Archiving the archive. In K. Neuburg, S. Pranz, W. Tsereteli, et al. (Eds.), Tbilisi—Archive of transition (pp. 37–40). Salenstein: Niggli.Google Scholar
  17. Siebel, W. (2012). Die europäische Stadt. In F. Eckardt (Ed.), Handbuch Stadtsoziologie (pp. 201–211). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  18. Sturm, G. (2000). Wege zum Raum: methodologische Annäherungen an ein Basiskon-zept raumbezogener Wissenschaften. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sutherland, I. E. (1965). The ultimate display. In Multimedia: From wagner to virtual reality (pp. 506–508).Google Scholar
  20. Zwicker, H., Cooley, H. R., & Verhoeff, N. (2017). Urban cartographies: Mapping mobility and presence. Television & New Media, 18(1), 93–99.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476416670012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of MediaMacromedia University of Applied SciencesMunichGermany
  2. 2.Fakultät InformatikTechnische Hochschule IngolstadtIngolstadtGermany
  3. 3.Department Lippstadt 2Hochschule Hamm-LippstadtHammGermany

Personalised recommendations