Advertisement

The Urban Nature Concept—of What Urban Green Consists of

  • Jürgen BreusteEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Cities and Nature book series (CITIES)

Abstract

Urban nature is notably diverse and species-rich. This is partially due to the particular ecological conditions provided by the urban environment. Due to the broad spectrum of human activity, the urban environment offers a range of habitats for different species. The “four natures approach” is a simple method for presenting urban nature in a clear and concise manner. It focuses on the particular features of urban nature (fauna, flora, and vegetation) and distinguishes between four different “types of nature” based on the degree of anthropomorphic influence that the landscape has experienced. Urban parks, woodlands, forests, gardens, agricultural land, wetlands, and new urban wildernesses contribute to urban nature. Each type of nature provides specific urban ecosystem services as benefits for urban residents. These urban nature types have specific structure, design, management, utilization forms, locations, and embedding into urban forms. Urban forest refers to the entirety of urban tree stock, irrespective of ownership and is considered a resource and provider of ecosystem services benefitting the city residents. It includes woods and woodlands as well as all trees on both public and private land (street trees, trees in parks, private gardens, cemeteries, brown fields, orchards).

Keywords

Urban nature Urban parks Urban woodlands Urban wetlands Urban agriculture Urban wilderness 

References

  1. Aitkenhead-Peterson J, Volder A (2010) Urban ecosystem ecology. American Society of Agronomy, MadisonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anstiftung (ed) (2018) Offene Werkstätten, Reparatur-Initiativen, Interkulturelle und Urbane Gemeinschaftsgärten (Open workshops, repair initiatives, intercultural and urban community gardens). https://anstiftung.de/…/1417-erste-schritte-wie-baue-ich-einen-interkulturellen-gemeinschaftsgarten-auf. Accessed 17 Mar 2018
  3. Artmann M, Sartison K (2018) The role of urban agriculture as a nature-based solution: a review for developing a systemic assessment framework. Sustainability 10:1–32.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barbosa O, Tratalos JA, Armsworth PR, Davies RG, Fuller RA, Johnson P, Gaston KJ (2007) Who benefits from access to green space? A case study from Sheffield, UK. Landsc Urban Plan 83:187–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barthel S, Isendahl C (2013) Urban gardens, agriculture, and water management: sources of resilience for long-term food security in cities. Ecol Econ 86:224–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bell S, Fox-Kämpfer R, Keshavarz N, Benson M, Caputo S, Noori S, Voigt A (eds) (2016) Urban allotment gardens in Europe. Routledge, London, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Breuste J (1994) “Urbanisierung” des Naturschutzgedankens: Diskussion von gegenwärtigen Problemen des Stadtnaturschutzes (“Urbanization” of nature conservation idea: Discussion of contemporary problems of nature conservation). Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung 26(6):214–220Google Scholar
  8. Breuste J (2010) Allotment gardens as a part of urban green infrastructure: actual trends and perspectives in Central Europe. In: Müller N, Werner P, Kelcey J (eds) Urban biodiversity and design—implementing the convention on biological diversity in towns and cities. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, pp 463–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Breuste J, Artmann M (2015) Allotment gardens contribute to urban ecosystem service: case study Salzburg, Austria. J Urban Plan Dev 141(3):A5014005Google Scholar
  10. Breuste J, Rahimi A (2015) Many public urban parks but who profits from them?—the example of Tabriz, Iran. Ecol Process 4:6.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-014-0027-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Breuste J, Pauleit S, Haase D, Sauerwein M (2016) Stadtökosysteme. Funktion, Management, Entwicklung (Urban ecosystems. Function, management and development). Springer Spektrum, Berlin, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brun A (2015) The “renaturation” of urban rivers: the case of the St Charles River in Quebec. In: Grafton Q, Daniell KA, Nauges C, Rinaudo J-D, Chan NWW (eds) Understanding and managing urban water in transition. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 527–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Burkhardt I, Dietrich R, Hoffmann H, Leschner J, Lohmann K, Schoder F, Schultz A (2008) Urbane Wälder (Urban Forests). Naturschutz und Biologische Vielfalt 63:3–214Google Scholar
  14. Comber A, Brunsdon C, Green E (2008) Using a GIS-based network analysis to determine urban green space accessibility for different ethnic and religious groups. Landsc Urban Plan 86:103–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Copestake M, City of Ottawa (2017) Urban forest management plan. https://ottawa.ca/en/urban-forest-management-plan. Accessed 14 Feb 2018
  16. Deutscher Verband für Wasserwirtschaft und Kulturbau e.V. (German Association for Water Management and Cultural Construction) (DVWK) (1996) Urbane Fließgewässer – I. Bisherige Entwicklung und künftige städtebauliche Chancen in der Stadt (Urban watercourses – I. Previous development and future chances for urban planning). DVWK-Materialien 2/1996, HennefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dietrich K (2014) Urbane Gärten für Mensch und Natur. Eine Übersicht und Bibliographie (Urban gardens for people and nature. An overview and bibliography). BfN-Skripten 386, Bonn, Bad GodesbergGoogle Scholar
  18. Dietrich R (2013) 2. Fachsymposium „Stadtgrün“ (2nd symposium Urban Green). 11–12. December 2013 in Berlin-Dahlem. Urbaner Wald Leipzig (Urban forest Leipzig). Stadtplanungsamt Leipzig, Leipzig. https://www.julius-kuehn.de/…/FS-2-Stadtgruen_2.4_Dietrich_Urbaner_Wald_Leipzi. Accessed 13 Feb 2018
  19. Dunnett N, Swanwick C, Woolley H (2002) Improving urban parks, play areas and open spaces. Department for Transport, Local Government and the Regions, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Dwyer FF, Nowak DJ, Noble MH, Sisinni SM (2000) Connecting people with ecosystems in 21st. Century: an assessment of our nation’s urban forest. Gen Tech Rep PNW-GTR-490. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, PortlandGoogle Scholar
  21. Faggi A, Breuste J (eds) (2015) La Cuenca Matanza-Riachuelo - una mirada ambiental para recuperar sus riberas (The catchment of Matanza-Riachuelo - an environmental view on the restoration of its shore areas). Universidad de Flores (UFLO), Buenos AiresGoogle Scholar
  22. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (eds) (2018) Food for the cities. www.fao.org/. Accessed 18 Mar 2018
  23. Forman R (2014) Urban ecology. Science of cities. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  24. Gälzer R (2001) Grünplanung für Städte. Planung, Entwurf, Bau und Erhaltung (Green planning for cities. Design, construction and conservation). Ulmer, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  25. Gälzer R, Hansely, H-J (1980) Grünraum, Freizeit und Erholung. Probleme, Entwicklungstendenzen, Ziele (Green space. Leisure and recreation. Problems, development tendencies, targets). Magistrat der Stadt Wien, WienGoogle Scholar
  26. Gilbert OL (1989) The ecology of urban habitats. Chapmann & Hall, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Grafton Q, Daniell KA, Nauges C, Rinaudo J-D, Chan NWW (eds) (2015) Understanding and managing urban water in transition. Springer, Berlin, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  28. GreenSurge (2015) A typology of urban green spaces, ecosystem provisioning services and demands. Brussels. https://greensurge.eu › working-packages › files › D3. Accessed 24 Aug 2019
  29. Greiner J, Gelbrich H (1975) Grünflächen der Stadt (Green spaces oft he city). 2. Verb Aufl, VEB Verlag für Bauwesen, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  30. Grunewald K, Richter B, Meinel G, Herold H, Syrbe R-U (2016) Vorschlag bundesweiter Indikatoren zur Erreichbarkeit öffentlicher Grünflächen: Bewertung der Ökosystemleistung „Erholung in der Stadt“ (Proposal of national indicators for accessibility of public green spaces. Assessment of ecosystem service „recreation in the city”). Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung 48(7):218–226Google Scholar
  31. Grunewald K, Richter B, Meinel G, Herold H, Syrbe R-U (2017) Proposal of indicators regarding the provision and accessibility of green spaces for assessing the ecosystem service “recreation in the city” in Germany. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manag, Special Issue: Ecosystem Services Nexus Thinking 13(2):26–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Javed MA, Ahmad SR, Ahmad A, Taj AA, Khan A (2013) Assessment of neighbourhood parks using GIS techniques in Sheikhupura city. Pak J Sci 65(2):296–302Google Scholar
  33. Kabisch N, Strohbach M, Haase D, Kronenberg J (2016) Urban green spaces availability in European cities. Ecol Indic 586–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kaiser O (2005) Bewertung und Entwicklung von urbanen Fließgewässern (Assessment and development of urban water courses). Dissertation, Fakultät für Forst- und Umweltwissenschaften der Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg i BrGoogle Scholar
  35. Kessel A, Green J, Pinder P, Wilkinson P, Grundy C, Lachowycz K (2009) Multidisciplinary research in public health: a case study of research on access to green space. Public Health 123(1):32–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Konijnendijk CC (2008) The forest and the city. The cultural landscape of urban woodland. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  37. Konijnendijk CC, Nilsson K, Randrup TB, Schipperijn J (eds) (2005) Urban forests and trees. A reference book. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  38. Konijnendijk CC, Richard RM, Kenney A, Randrup TB (2006) Defining urban forestry—a comparative perspective of North America and Europe. Urban For Urban Green 4(3–4):93–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Konijnendijk CC, Annerstedt M, Nielsen AB, Maruthaveera S (2013) Benefits of urban parks. A systematic review. A Report for IFPRA (International Federation of Parks and Recreation Administration). Copenhagen/Alnarp. www.ifpra.org. Accessed 5 Feb 2018
  40. Kowarik I (1992) Das Besondere der städtischen Flora und Vegetation (The specific of urban flora and vegetation). In: Deutscher Rat für Landespflege (ed) Natur in der Stadt - der Beitrag der Landespflege zur Stadtentwicklung. Schriftenreihe des Deutschen Rates für Landespflege 61:33–47Google Scholar
  41. Kowarik I (1993) Stadtbrachen als Niemandsländer, Naturschutzgebiete oder Gartenkunstwerke der Zukunft? Geobotan (Urban brownfields as nobody’s lands, nature protection areas or artificial garden design of the future?). Kolloquium 9:3–24Google Scholar
  42. Kowarik I (1995) Zur Gliederung anthropogener Gehölzbestände unter Beachtung urban-industrieller Standorte (To the outline of urban woodlands under consideration of urban-industrial locations). Verh Gesell Ökologie 24:411–421Google Scholar
  43. Kowarik I (2005) Wild urban woodlands: towards a conceptual framework. In: Kowarik I, Körner S (eds) Wild urban woodlands. New perspectives for urban forestry. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  44. Kowarik I (2018) Urban wilderness: supply, demand, and access. Urban For Urban Green 29:36–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Larson JT (2012) A comparative study of community garden system in Germany and the United States and their role in creating sustainable communities. Arboric J 35:121–141Google Scholar
  46. Leser H (2008) Stadtökologie in Stichworten (Urban ecology in keywords), 2nd edn. Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  47. Liu S (2015) Urban park planning on spatial disparity between demand and supply of park service. In: International conference on advances in energy and environmental science (ICAES) (ed), 1167–1171. www.SLiu–2015–researchgate.net. Accessed 11 Feb 2018Google Scholar
  48. Liu L, Jensen MB (2018) Green infrastructure for sustainable urban water management: practices of five forerunner cities. Cities 74:126–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mathey J, Arndt T, Banse J, Rink D (2016) Public perception of spontaneous vegetation on brownfields in urban areas—results from surveys in Dresden and Leipzig (Germany). Urban For Urban Green 29:384–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mougeot LJA (2006) Growing better cities: urban agriculture for sustainable development. International Development Research Centre, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  51. Niemelä J, Breuste J, Elmqvist T, Guntenspergen G, James P, McIntyre N (eds) (2011) Urban ecology, patterns, processes, and applications. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  52. Ossola A, Niemelä J (2018) Urban biodiversity. From research to practice. Routledge, Milton ParkGoogle Scholar
  53. Parsanik Z, Maroofnezhad A (2017) Assessing urban parks of district 13 of Mashhad Municipality. Open J Geol 7:457–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pütz M, Bernasconi A (2017) Urban Forestry in der Schweiz: fünf Herausforderungen für Wissenschaft und Praxis (Urban forestry in Switzerland: five challenges for science and practice). Schweiz Z Forstwes 168(5):246–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pütz M, Schmid S, Bernasconi A, Wolf B (2015) Urban forestry. Definition, Trends und Folgerungen für die Waldakteure in der Schweiz (Urban forestry. Definition, trends and conclusions for forest stakeholders). Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Forstwesen 166(4):230–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Qureshi S, Kazmi SJH, Breuste JH (2010) Ecological disturbances due to high cutback in the green infrastructure of Karachi: analyses of public perception about associated health problems. Urban For Urban Green 9:187–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ramsar (1971) Convention on wetland of international importance especially of waterfowl habitats. Ramsar, 2.2.1971. www.ramsar.org. Accessed 4 Jul 2018
  58. Randrup TB, Konijnendijk CC, Kaennel Dobbertin M, Prüller R (2005) The concept of urban forestry in Europe. In: Konijnendijk CC, Nilsson K, Randrup TB, Schipperijn J (eds) Urban forests and trees. Springer, Berlin, pp 9–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Reimers B (ed) (2010) Gärten und Politik. Vom Kultivieren der Erde. Oekom Verlag, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  60. Rink D, Arndt T (2011) Urbane Wälder: Ökologische Stadterneuerung durch Anlage urbaner Waldflächen auf innerstädtischen Flächen im Nutzungswandel (Urban woodlands. Ecological urban renewal by urban woodlands on inner city areas in change of use). (=UFZ-Bericht 3/2011). Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung – UFZ Department Stadt- und Umweltsoziologie, LeipzigGoogle Scholar
  61. Rosol M (2006) Gemeinschaftsgärten in Berlin: Eine qualitative Untersuchung zu Potenzialen und Risiken bürgerschaftlichen Engagements im Grünflächenbereich vor dem Hintergrund des Wandels von Staat und Planung (Community gardens in Berlin: A qualitative investigation in respect to the change of government and planning). Taschenbuch, Verlag Mensch & Buch, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  62. Schwarz A (2005) Der Park in der Metropole. Urbanes Wachstum und städtische Parks im 19. Jahrhundert (The park in the metropolis. Urban growth and urban parks in 19th century). Transcript Verlag, BielefeldGoogle Scholar
  63. Stewart N (2018) Urban gardening in Germany. www.young-germany.de/topic/live/…/urban-gardening-in-germany. Accessed 16 Mar 2018
  64. Swintion S, Lupi MF, Proberstson GP, Hamilton SK (2007) Ecosystem services and agriculture: cultivating agricultural ecosystems for diverse benefits. Ecol Econ 64:245–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Toftager M, Ekholm O, Schipperijn J, Stigsdotter U, Bentsen P, Gronbaek M, Randrup TB, Kamper-Jorgensen F (2011) Distance to green space and physical activity: a Danish national representative survey. J Phys Act Heal 8:741–749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Unal M, Uslu C, Cilek A (2016) GIS-based accessibility analysis for neighbourhood parks: The case of Cukurova district. J Digit Landsc Arch 1:45–56Google Scholar
  67. Van Herzele A, Wiedemann T (2003) A monitoring tool for the provision of accessible and attractive urban green spaces. Landsc Urban Plan 63:109–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Vogt C, Dunkmann N (2015) Green city. Geformte Landschaft - Vernetzte Natur: Das Ruhrgebiet in der Kunst (Green City. Shaped landscape—networked nature: The Ruhr Area in art). Kerber Verlag, AachenGoogle Scholar
  69. Zipperer WC, Sisinni SM, Pouyat R (1997) Urban tree cover: an ecological perspective. Urban Ecosyst 1(4):229–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geography and GeologyUniversity of SalzburgSalzburgAustria

Personalised recommendations