Advertisement

Fostering Students’ Construction of Meaningfulness of Mathematics with Mathematical Modelling Problems

  • Katrin VorhölterEmail author
  • Björn Schwarz
Chapter
  • 25 Downloads
Part of the International Perspectives on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Modelling book series (IPTL)

Abstract

Working on modelling problems in school can show students how frequently mathematics is used in society and in everyday life. As a result, their motivation to learn mathematics can increase. However, there has not been any systematic investigation into whether, and how, these aims are achieved, nor is it known which aspects of modelling problems are meaningful to the students. In this chapter, we present a theoretical framework for analysing students’ personal meaningfulness of mathematics with regard to influencing factors and consequences. Furthermore, we present the results of a qualitative study with 15 students of grade 10 that show which characteristics of modelling problems and of working with modelling problems in class have a direct or an indirect influence on the students’ construction of personal meaningfulness.

Keywords

Basic needs Beliefs Constructivism Mathematics classroom Meaningfulness Perspectives of modelling Modelling problems 

References

  1. Blum, W. (2015). Quality teaching of mathematical modelling: What do we know, what can we do? In S. J. Cho (Ed.), The proceedings of the 12th international congress on mathematical education (pp. 73–96). Cham: Springer International.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Burkhardt, H. (2006). Modelling in mathematics classrooms: Reflections on past development and the future. ZDM Mathematics Education, 38(2), 178–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2000). Stimulated recall methodology in second language research. Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  4. Hernandez-Martinez, P., & Vos, P. (2018). “Why do I have to learn this?” a case study on students’ experiences of the relevance of mathematical modelling activities. ZDM Mathematics Education, 50(1–2), 245–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kaiser, G. (2017). The teaching and learning of mathematical modelling. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 267–291). Reston: NCTM.Google Scholar
  6. Kaiser, G., Schwarz, B., & Buchholtz, N. (2011). Authentic modelling problems in mathematics education. In G. Kaiser, W. Blum, R. Borromeo Ferri, & G. Stillman (Eds.), Trends in teaching and learning of mathematical modelling (pp. 591–601). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lingefjärd, T. (2006). Faces of mathematical modeling. ZDM Mathematics Education, 38(2), 96–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Maaß, K. (2007). Modelling in class: What do we students want to learn? In C. Haines, P. L. Galbraith, W. Blum, & S. Khan (Eds.), Mathematical modelling (ICTMA 12): Education, engineering and economics (pp. 63–78). Chichester: Horwood.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mitchell, M. (1993). Situational interest: Its multifaceted structure in the secondary school mathematics classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 424–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and Well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense-making in mathematics. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 334–370). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  12. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (2003). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Vorhölter, K. (2009). Sinn im Mathematikunterricht: Zur Rolle von Modellierungsaufgaben bei der Sinnkonstruktion von Schülerinnen und Schülern. Opladen: Budrich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EducationUniversity of HamburgHamburgGermany
  2. 2.Faculty IIUniversity of VechtaVechtaGermany

Personalised recommendations