Advertisement

Factors Influencing Urban Open Space Encroachment: The Case of Bloemfontein, South Africa

  • Lindelwa SinxadiEmail author
  • Maléne Campbell
Chapter
  • 42 Downloads

Abstract

Rapid changes in land use and occupancy patterns of urban open spaces have led to value conflicts in terms of the quest for sustainable neighbourhoods. Urban open spaces are becoming extinct due to rapid urbanization, hence affecting the spatial patterns of urban land use. Such gradual disappearance has resulted from intensity of land use for residential, business, and community facilities, among others. This has created challenges in terms of the value and sustainability of open spaces, land use management, and preservation. This study seeks to explore, in its entirety, the incidence of open space encroachment in the Mangaung Township, Free State Province of South Africa. Adopting a case study approach, this study deploys a variety of techniques such as focus group discussions, face-to-face semi-structured interviews, and personal observation for data elicitation at different intervals. Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with purposively recruited town planning, land invasion, and environmental management professionals from local and provincial levels of government. Discussants for the focus group discussions consisted of community members who have encroached upon open spaces and those occupying properties around open spaces. Events within the study area were observed at intervals and memos drawn therefrom. The accruing data was analyzed thematically, relying on qualitative content analysis (QCA). The study’s findings, besides the provision of an insight into the drivers of this malaise, chronicles the plethora of strategies which have been adopted and implemented to curtail its continued occurrence, highlights the strengths and weaknesses of these strategies, and proffers recommendations on how to optimally surmount this imbroglio. Findings indicate that the high cost of the available land for housing, poor sustenance and management of the available housing stock by municipality officials, non-participation of community members in planning processes, and poor enforcement of land use regimes remain salient contributors to the preponderance of open space encroachment. This study’s findings hold immense implications for planning practitioners as well as other professionals and policy makers working within the urban planning and socio-economic development praxes both within the province and beyond.

Keywords

Participation South Africa Strategy Sustainability Urban open spaces 

References

  1. Al-Hagal KS (2008) Towards a sustainable neighborhood: the role of open spaces. Int J Archit Res 2(2008):162–177Google Scholar
  2. Berke PR, Conroy MM (2000) Are we planning for sustainable development? An evaluation of the 30 comprehensive plans. APA J 66(1, Winter):21–33Google Scholar
  3. Campbell K (2001) Rethinking open space, open space provision and management: a way forward, report presented by Scottish executive central research unit. Edinburgh, ScotlandGoogle Scholar
  4. Cohen B (2006) Urbanization in developing countries: current trends, future projections, and key challenges for sustainability. Technol Soc 28:63–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Creswell JW, Poth CN (2018) Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among the five approaches, 4th edn. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  6. Cross C, Seager JJ (2010) Towards identifying the causes of South Africa’s street homelessness: some policy recommendations. Dev South Afr 27(1):143–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dehghanmongabadi A (2014) Introduction to achieve sustainable neighbourhoods. Int J Arts Commer 3(9)Google Scholar
  8. Haaland C, van den Bosch CK (2015) Challenges and strategies for urban green-space planning in cities undergoing densification: a review. Urban For Urban Green 14(2015):760–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Li F, Sun X, Li X, Hao X, Li W, Qian Y, Liu H, Sun H (2016) Research on the sustainable development of green-space in Beijing using the dynamic systems model. Sustainability 8965:1–17Google Scholar
  10. Lindsey G (2003) Sustainability and urban creenways: indicators in Indianapolis. J Am Plann Assoc 69(2, Spring). © American Planning Association, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  11. Mangaung Metropolitan Municipality. Reviewed integrated development plan 2015–16Google Scholar
  12. Maruani T, Amit-Cohen I (2007) Open space planning models: a review of approaches and methods. ScienceDirect Dep Geogr Environ Israel Landsc Urban Plann 81(2007):1–13Google Scholar
  13. Mashalaba YB (2013) Public open space planning and development in previously neglected townships. Unpublished dissertation. Department of Urban and Regional Planning. University of the Free StateGoogle Scholar
  14. Mensah CA (2014a) Urban green spaces in Africa: nature and challenges. Int J Ecosyst 4(1):1–11Google Scholar
  15. Mensah CA (2014b) Destruction of urban green spaces: a problem beyond urbanization in Kumasi City (Ghana). Am J Environ Protect 3(1):1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nooe RM, Patterson DA (2010) The ecology of homelessness. J Hum Behav Soc Environ 20(2):105–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Olufemi O (2004) Socio-political imperatives of land invasion and eviction: revisiting the Bredell case, Johannesburg, South Africa. Centre for Urban and Community Studies. International conference. Toronto, June 2004Google Scholar
  18. Rowley S, Phibbs P (2012) Delivering diverse and affordable housing on infill development sites. AHURI final report no.193. Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  19. Somerville P (2013) Understanding homelessness. Hous Theory Soc 30(4):384–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. South Africa (2013) Spatial planning and land use management act, Act 16 of 2013. Department of Rural Development & Land Reform. Government Press, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  21. Speak S (2004) Degrees of destitution: a typology of homelessness in developing countries. Hous Stud 19(3):465–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Speak S, Tipple G (2006) Perceptions, persecution and pity: the limitations on interventions for homeless in developing countries. Int J Urban Reg Res 30(1):172–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Turner T (1992) Open space planning in London (from standards per 1000 to green strategy). Town Plan Rev 63(4):365–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. UN-Habitat. Global Report on Human Settlements (2009) Planning sustainable cities. Nairobi, KenyaGoogle Scholar
  25. UN-Habitat. World Cities Report (2016) Urbanization and development: emerging features. Nairobi, KenyaGoogle Scholar
  26. UN-Habitat (2000) Strategies to combat homelessness. United Nations Centre for Human Settlements, NairobiGoogle Scholar
  27. UN-Habitat (2005) Financing urban shelter: global report on human settlements 2005. NairobiGoogle Scholar
  28. UN-Habitat (2015) Discussion note 3: urban planning. A new strategy of sustainable neighbourhood planning: five principles. Nairobi, KenyaGoogle Scholar
  29. UN-Habitat (2016a) Fundaments of urbanization. Evidence base for policy makingGoogle Scholar
  30. UN-Habitat (2016b) World Cities Report. NairobiGoogle Scholar
  31. UN-Habitat (2016c) Habitat III policy paper 10 – housing policies (unedited version). NairobiGoogle Scholar
  32. United Kingdom (1906) Open Space Act, Act of 1906. Chapter 25. UKGoogle Scholar
  33. Watson V (2002) Do we learn from planning practice? The contribution of the practice movement to planning theory. J Plan Educ Res 22(2):178–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. World Health Organization (WHO) (2017) Urban green spaces: a brief for action. EuropeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Built EnvironmentCentral University of TechnologyFree StateSouth Africa
  2. 2.Department of Urban and Regional PlanningUniversity of the Free StateBloemfonteinSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations