Advertisement

Aposthia

  • Mohamed A. Baky Fahmy
Chapter
  • 237 Downloads

Abstract

Aposthia is a rare congenital condition in humans, in which the foreskin of the penis is completely missing in a normally developed penis and urethra. Almost all mammal penises have a foreskin which called the preputial sheath or penile sheath into which the whole penis is retracted, only monotremes (platypus and echidna) completely lack foreskins. It is suggested that the extensive study on aposthia may be helpful for proper understanding of the impaction of circumcision in health and reducing the controversy in medical sciences about it, as cases of aposthia could raise a couple of questions which deserve further researches:
  • Is circumcised “aposthic” penis is the natural normal penis and having a prepuce is a pathological condition which should be treated by its removal?

  • Is aposthia a feature of the dignified leader or the first man “Adam”, and circumcision is a ritual trial to have a copy or similarity to the symbolic leader?

  • Aposthia being a quantitative recessive trait, as had been suggested by some researchers, may be prevalent in certain ancient healthy and comparatively developed inbred population isolates.

Keywords

Aposthia Preputial agenesis Microposthia Neo-prepuce and preputial restoration 

References

  1. 1.
    Martin RD. Primate origins and evolution: a phylogenetic reconstruction. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1990. p. 42–3.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kim DS, Lee JY, Pang MG. Male circumcision: a Korean perspective. BJU Int. 1999;83(1):28–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Talbot ES. Inheritance of circumcision effects. Medicine. 1898;4:473–5.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Amin Ud Din M, Salam A, Rafiq MA, Khaliq I, Ansar M, Ahmad W. Aposthia: a birth defect or normal quantitative recessive human genetic trait? East Mediterr Health J. 2007;13(2):280–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Parkash S, Jeyakumar K, Subramanya K, Chaudhuri S. Human subpreputial collection: its nature and formation. J Urol. 1973;110(2):211–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Garcia-Palacios M, et al. Congenital absence of preputial foreskin: an extremely uncommon anomaly. J Pediatr Surg. 2013;48:E13–5.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.10.072.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liu X, Liu G, Shen J, Yue A, Isaacson D, Sinclair A, Cao M, Liaw A, Cunha GR, Baskin L. Human glans and preputial development. Differentiation. 2018;103:86–99.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diff.2018.08.002.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gleniste TW. A consideration of the processes involved in the development of the prepuce in man. Br J Urol. 1956;28:243–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fahmy MA. Chapter 15: Reconstructive surgery for circumcision complications. In: Complications in male circumcision. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2019.  https://doi.org/10.1016/C2018-0-03679-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohamed A. Baky Fahmy
    • 1
  1. 1.Pediatric SurgeryAl Azher UniversityCairoEgypt

Personalised recommendations