Advertisement

Histology of the Prepuce

  • Mohamed A. Baky Fahmy
Chapter
  • 231 Downloads

Abstract

There are a limited number of comprehensive studies in the literature investigating the histologic characteristics of the human prepuce, but interest to evaluate the histology and innervation of the prepuce had been reported since 1801, when probably the first reference to innervation of the prepuce is investigated by Bichat. Such studies are paramount for the proper reconstruction of the preputial grafts and flaps; which used for different penile surgeries, and elsewhere in the body and for understanding the proper extension of different benign and malignant pathologies.

The prepuce is a pentalaminar structure composed of a squamous mucosal epithelium, lamina propria (corion), dartos muscle, dermis, and outer glabrous skin.

The mucosa of the inner prepuce is lined by stratified squamous epithelium, similar to the frictional mucosa of the vagina, the inner eyelid, the mouth, and the oesophagus, the mucosal aspect of the prepuce has a great capacity for self-repair. The neural and vascular networks of the preputial mucosa rise higher in the dermis, thereby favouring more acute sensation.

The subepithelial connective tissue is very loose and vascularized and, therefore, tends to become rapidly edematous in inflammatory conditions.

Keywords

Lamina propria Pentalaminar Preputial graft Langerhan’s cells 

References

  1. 1.
    Barreto J, Caballero C, Cubilla A. Penis. In: Sternberg SS, editor. Histology for pathologists. 2nd ed. New York: Raven Press; 1997. p. 1043–4.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gould VE, Moll R, Moll I, et al. Neuroendocrine (Merkel) cells of the skin: hyperplasia, dysplasia, and neoplasms. Lab Invest. 1985;52:334–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Parkash S, Jeyakumar K, Subramanya K, Chaudhuri S. Human subpreputial collection: its nature and formation. J Urol. 1973;110(2):211–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Batistatou A, Panelos J, Zioga A, Charalabopoulos KA. Ectopic modified sebaceous glands in human penis. Int J Surg Pathol. 2006;14(4):355–6.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1066896906291779.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dickinson RL. Human sex anatomy: a topographical hand atlas, vol. 82. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1949.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barreto J, Caballero C, Cubilla A. Penis. In: Sternberg S, editor. Histology for pathologists. New York: Raven Press; 1992. p. 725.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Winkelmann RK. The cutaneous innervation of human newborn prepuce. J Investig Dermatol. 1956;26(1):53–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jefferson G. The peripenic muscle: some observations on the anatomy of phimosis. Surg Gynecol Obstetr. 1916;23:177–81.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Van Howe RS. Coste Cective: treatment of phimosis. Pediatrics. 1998;102:E43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dogiel AS. Die nervenendigunngen in der schleimhaut der aussen genitalorgane des menschen. Arch F Mikr Anat. 1893;41:585–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Taylor JR, Lockwood AP, Taylor AJ. The prepuce: specialized mucosa of the penis and its loss to circumcision. Br J Urol. 1996;77:291–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tuncali D, Bingul F, Talim B, et al. Histologic characteristics of the human prepuce pertaining to its clinical behaviour as a dual graft. Ann Plast Surg. 2005;54(2):191–5.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000141939.42990.70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fleiss P, Hodges F, Van Howe RS. Immunological functions of the human prepuce. Sex Transm Infect. 1998;74(5):364–7. http://www.cirp.org/library/disease/STD/fleiss3/CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Weiss GN, Sanders SM, Westbrook KC. The distribution and density of langerhans cells in the human prepuce: site of a diminished immune response? Isr J Med Sci. 1993;29:42–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    de Witte L, Nabatov A, Pion M, et al. Langerin is a natural barrier to HIV-1 transmission by Langerhans cells. Nat Med. 2007;13:367–71. Abstract available at http://www.nature.com/nm/journal/v13/n3/abs/nm1541.htmlCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Parkash S, Raghuram R, Venkatesan K, et al. Sub-preputial wetness—its nature. Ann Nat Med Sci. 1982;18:109–12.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Anderson D, Politch JA, Pudney J. HIV infection and immune defence of the penis. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2011;65:220–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ganor Y, Bomsel M. HIV-1 transmission in the male genital tract. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2011;65:284–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ritter RJ, Denniston GC. Say no to circumcision. 2nd ed. Aptos: Hourglass Book Publishing; 1996.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohamed A. Baky Fahmy
    • 1
  1. 1.Pediatric SurgeryAl Azher UniversityCairoEgypt

Personalised recommendations