Advertisement

Recall Practices in Central and Eastern Europe: From Citizen Accountability to Partisan Account Settling

  • Sergiu Mișcoiu
Chapter
  • 13 Downloads

Abstract

As theoretically conceived by law-makers, local recall referendums were supposed to offer citizens a chance to withdraw the mandates of those mayors who abuse their confidence by perpetrating illegal and/or strikingly illegitimate actions during their term in office. However, the limited practice of post-communist Eastern European countries suggests that recall referendums turned into a mere instrument for settling the accounts that other political actors had with certain mayors. This chapter explores this specificity of the recall referendums by highlighting evidence from several such procedures that took place in the region and by exploring in more detail the 2017 recall referendum in Chisinau, Moldova.

References

  1. Dawson, J. (2016). Cultures of Democracy in Serbia and Bulgaria: How Ideas Shape Publics. Oxford: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Henry, V., & Mișcoiu, S. (2016). Le discours politique et la quête identitaire en République de Moldavie. In S. Mișcoiu & N. Păun (Eds.), Intégration et désintégration en Europe Centrale et Orientale. Cahiers FARE no. 9 (pp. 221–254). Paris: l’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  3. Holmes, L. (1997). Post-Communism. An Introduction. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  4. IPP. (2015). Barometrul de Opinie [Barometer of Public Opinion]. Institutul de Politici Publice. Retrieved from www.ipp.md.
  5. IRI. (2017, February–March). Opinion Survey on the Trust in Institutions. International Republican Institute – Magenta. Retrieved from www.iri.org/country/moldova.
  6. Janušauskienė, D. (2011). Post-Communist Democratisation in Lithuania: Elites, Parties, and Youth Political Organisations: 1988–2001. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
  7. LeDuc, L. (2003). The Politics of Direct Democracy. Toronto: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
  8. LKP. (2017, May). Extensive Research on the Public Support for Institutions. Lake Research Partners. Retrieved from www.lkpsec.com.
  9. March, L. (2007). From Moldovanism to Europeanization? Moldova’s Communists and Nation Building. Nationalities Papers, 35(4), 601–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. McFaul, M. (2002). The Fourth Wave of Democracy and Dictatorship: Noncooperative Transitions in the Postcommunist World. World Politics, 54(2), 212–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mendelsohn, M., & Parkin, A. (Eds.). (2001). Referendum Democracy. Citizens, Elites and Deliberation in Referendum Campaigns. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  12. Mișcoiu, S. (Ed.). (2012). Transitions et démocratisation en Roumanie. Illusions, mythes et défis/Transitions and democratisation in Romania. Illusions, Myths and Challenges. Cluj-Napoca: Printing House of the Foundation for European Studies.Google Scholar
  13. Mișcoiu, S. (2019a). Le spectre du peuple politique: l’éternelle transition roumaine. In C. Delsol & G. de Ligio (Eds.), La démocratie dans l’adversité. Enquête international (pp. 925–944). Paris: Editions du Cerf.Google Scholar
  14. Mișcoiu, S. (2019b). ‘Never Just a Local War’: Explaining the Failure of a Mayor’s Recall Referendum. Contemporary Politics, 25(1), 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mișcoiu, S., & Păun, N. (Eds.). (2016). Intégration et désintégration en Europe Centrale et Orientale. Cahiers FARE no. 9. Paris: l’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  16. Moskalewicz, M., & Przybylski, W. (2017). Understanding Central Europe. Oxford: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Piasecki, A. (2011). Twenty Years of Polish Direct Democracy at the Local Level. In T. Schiller (Ed.), Local Direct Democracy in Europe (pp. 126–137). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag fiir Sozialwissenschaften.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Podolnjak, R., & Gardašević, Đ. (2013). Directly Elected Mayors and the Problem of Cohabitation. Revus, 20(1), 79–96.Google Scholar
  19. Quinlan, P. (2004). Back to the Future: An Overview of Moldova under Voronin. Demokratizatsiya, 12(4), 485–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Qvortrup, M. (2011). Hasta la Vista: A Comparative Institutionalist Analysis of the Recall. Representation, 47(2), 61–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Radio Praha. (2011). Radio Praha Report. Retrieved from https://www.radio.cz/en/section/news/liberec-mayor-recalled-from-post.
  22. Secrieru, S. (2011). The Transnistrian Conflict – New Opportunities and Old Obstacles for Trust Building (2009–2010). Southeast European and Black Sea Region Studies, 11(3), 241–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Serdült, U. (2016). Recall in Poland. Paper prepared for presentation at the 24 IPSA World Congress, Poznan, Poland, July 22–28.Google Scholar
  24. Serdült, U., & Welp, Y. (2017). The Levelling Up of a Political Institution: Perspectives on the Recall Referendum. In S. P. Ruth, Y. Welp, & L. Whitehead (Eds.), Let the People Rule? Direct Democracy in the Twenty-first-century (pp. 139–156). Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
  25. Smith, M. (2013). The Local Referendum Revisited: An Old Tool For Inclusive and Effective Participation in New Democracies. In B. Geissel & M. Joas (Eds.), Participatory Democratic Innovations in Europe. Improving the Quality of Democracy? (pp. 9–32). Budrich: Opladen.Google Scholar
  26. The Venice Commission. (2019, July). Report on the Recall of Mayors and Local Elected Representatives. The Venice Commission. Retrieved from https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-AD(2019)011rev-e.
  27. Trabucco, F. (2017). The Evolution of Referendum Experience in Hungary. The Journal of Comparative Law, 12(1), 173–197.Google Scholar
  28. Uleri, P. V. (2002). On Referendum Voting in Italy: Yes, No, or Non-Vote? How Italian Parties Learned to Control Referendums. European Journal of Political Research, 41(6), 863–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Visegrády, A. (1992). Transition to Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe: Experiences of a Model Country – Hungary. William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, 1(2), 245–266.Google Scholar
  30. Way, L. (2003). Weak States and Pluralism: The Case of Moldova. East European Politics and Societies, 17(3), 454–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Węglarz, B. (2013). Ewolucja lokalnej demokracji bezpośredniej w Polsce po 1989 roku. Kraków: Księgarnia Akademicka.Google Scholar
  32. Welp, Y. (2013). ¿Por qué Perú? Análisis de la revocatoria del mandato en perspectiva comparada [Why Peru? An Analysis of Recall in Comparative Perspective]. Elecciones, 12(13), 13–51.Google Scholar
  33. Welp, Y. (2016). Recall Referendums in Peruvian Municipalities: A Political Weapon for Bad Losers or an Instrument of Accountability? Democratization, 23(7), 1162–1179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Welp, Y., & Milanese, J. P. (2018). Playing by the Rules of the Game. The Partisan Use of Recall Referendums in Colombia. Democratization, 25(8), 1379–1396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sergiu Mișcoiu
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of International Relations and German StudiesBabeş-Bolyai UniversityCluj-NapocaRomania

Personalised recommendations