Advertisement

Recall Elections in the US: Its Long Past and Uncertain Future

  • Joshua Spivak
Chapter
  • 14 Downloads

Abstract

Thanks to the recall of California Governor Gray Davis in 2003, and his replacement by international movie star Arnold Schwarzenegger, the recall gained a spotlight. While this may be part of an expansion of the recall throughout the globe, a look back at US history shows that it has been popular before, only to crash back into disuse. The recall is currently in a boom phase, as jurisdictions in the US have adopted the recall over the last decade, and it may be growing in use. There are technological reasons to believe that the recall will not effectively disappear in the future and may continue to grow. However, there are also practical hurdles that will prevent the recall from becoming a major player in US politics, even in many of the states that possess what this part of what the Los Angeles Times once called “freak legislation.”

References

  1. Associated Press. (2013, July 28). Michigan Law Could Lead to Fewer Recall Elections. Associated Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bailey, H. (2009, September 19). How Joe Wilson’s Heckle Became a Campaign Cash Cow. Newsweek.Google Scholar
  3. Barnes, R. (2007, October 28). Judicial Races Now Rife with Politics. Washington Post.Google Scholar
  4. Bird, F. L., & Ryan, F. M. (1930). The Recall of Public Officers. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  5. Blaisdell, E. (2012, May 17). Petition for Keyser Recall Election Given to City Official. Cumberland Times-News.Google Scholar
  6. Cronin, T. (1989). Direct Democracy: The Politics of Initiative, Referendum and Recall. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dodd, W. F. (1911, December). The Recall and the Political Responsibility of Judges. Michigan Law Review.Google Scholar
  8. Elliot, J. (Ed.). (1891). The Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution by the General Convention at Philadelphia in 1787. Philadelphia: J.J. Lippincott Company.Google Scholar
  9. Farmer, R. (2001). Power to the People: The Progressive Movement for the Recall, 1890s to 1920. New England Journal of History, 57(Winter), 59–83.Google Scholar
  10. Ferrara, D. (2017, April 13). Elected Judges Cannot Be Recalled, Nevada Supreme Court Rules. Las Vegas Review Journal.Google Scholar
  11. Geissel, B., & Jung, S. (2018). Recall in Germany: Explaining the Use of a Local Democratic Innovation. Democratization, 25(8), 1358–1378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hamilton, A. (1962). The Papers of Alexander Hamilton (H. Syrett, Ed.). New York: Columbia University Press, 5:69.Google Scholar
  13. Henton, D. (2016, March 14). Wildrose Takes Another Run at MLA Recall with Private Member’s Bill. Calgary Herald.Google Scholar
  14. Hines, L. (2012, October 30). Moreno Valley: School Board Member Rios Won’t Face Recall. Press Enterprise.Google Scholar
  15. Johnson, K. (2015, February 11). Love and Politics Collide as Scandals Plague Oregon’s Fourth-Term Governor. New York Times.Google Scholar
  16. Lawler, E. (2016, February 9). Recalling Gov. Rick Snyder Is Harder than Ever Under 2012 Law He Signed. MLive.Google Scholar
  17. Lee, K. (2013, July 27). Colorado Online Voter System Can Play Role in Future Recall Elections. Denver Post.Google Scholar
  18. Los Angeles Times Editorial. (1911, October 10).Google Scholar
  19. Luce, R. (1930). Legislative Principles. Boston: Riverside Press.Google Scholar
  20. Mowry, G. (1951). The California Progressives. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  21. New York State Convention. (1788). The Debates and Proceedings of the Convention of the State of New York (p. 63). New York: Francis Childs.Google Scholar
  22. New York Times. (1912, April 5). Roosevelt Assailed in House by Gardner.Google Scholar
  23. Nicholls, S. (2011, December 14). Let Voters Dump Bad Government, Experts Decide. Sydney Morning Herald.Google Scholar
  24. Norfolk Daily News Editorial. (2015, November 7). Recall Isn’t the Proper Response.Google Scholar
  25. Sitton, T. (1992). John Randolph Haynes: California Progressive (p. 85). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Spivak, J. (2004). California’s Recall: Adoption of the “Grand Bounce” for Elected Officials. California History.Google Scholar
  27. Spivak, J. (2014, June 10). Elections Laws That Prevent Elections. Reuters.Google Scholar
  28. Spotswood, D. (2019, June 15). Glickman Could Avoid Recall Effort by Running Again. Marin Independent Journal.Google Scholar
  29. Stulov, M. (2012, June 28). City Approves Reinstating Mayoral Elections. Moscow Times.Google Scholar
  30. Sych, L. (1996, October). State Recall Elections: What Explains Their Outcomes? Comparative State Politics.Google Scholar
  31. Taft, W. H. (1913). Popular Government: Its Essence, Its Permanence and Its Perils. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  32. The Committee to Recall Robert Menendez from the Office of Senator v. United States Senator Robert Menendez, 7 A3d 720. (2010)Google Scholar
  33. The Electoral Commission, Introduction to the Recall of MPs Act 2015.Google Scholar
  34. Thorpe, F. (Ed.). (1906). The Federal and State Constitutions Colonial Charters, and Other Organic Laws of the States Territories and Colonies Now or Heretofore Forming The United States of America. Washington, DC: Government Printing Press.Google Scholar
  35. U.S. Term Limits v. Thornton, 514 US 779.Google Scholar
  36. Welp, Y. (2018). Recall Referendum Around the World: Origins, Institutional Designs and Current Debates. In L. Morel & M. Qvortrup (Eds.), Compendium on Direct Democracy. Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Welp, Y., & Milanese, J. P. (2018). Playing by the Rules of the Game. The Partisan Use of Recall Referendums in Colombia. Democratization, 25(8), 1379–1396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Whitaker, L. P. (coord.). (2012, January 5). Recall of Legislators and the Removal of Members of Congress from Office. Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
  39. Whitehead, L. (2018). The Recall of Elected Office Holders. The Growing Incidence of a Venerable, but Overlooked, Democratic Institution. Democratization, 25(8), 1341–1357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wisconsin Democracy Campaign. (2012, July 31). Recall Race for Governor Cost $81 Million: Fifteen Recall Races in 2011 and 2012 Cost $137 Million.Google Scholar
  41. Zimmerman, J. (1997). The Recall: Tribunal of the People. Westport: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joshua Spivak
    • 1
  1. 1.Hugh L. Carey Institute for Government ReformWagner CollegeNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations