Advertisement

Language

  • Roberto Gronda
Chapter
  • 22 Downloads
Part of the Synthese Library book series (SYLI, volume 421)

Abstract

This chapter is devoted to the analysis of Dewey’s philosophy of language, which is central for the understanding of the semantic account of inquiry I formulate in Chaps. 3 and 4. It also strengthens and refines the conclusions reached in Chap. 1, thus providing a more fine-grained analysis of the structure of life-behaviors. Dewey’s theory of inquiry is grounded in the distinction that Dewey draws between signs and symbols, and between significance and meaning. I locate the difference between significance and meaning in the kind of response that signs and symbols solicit, and, in so doing, I explore the relevance of Dewey’s semantic externalism and anti-representationalism.

Keywords

Language Metaphilosophy Activity Sign Symbol Meaning Significance Agreement in practice Pragmatist account of concepts Operationalism Holism Articulation Scientific and common-sense concepts 

References

  1. Barrotta, P. (2018). Scientists, democracy and society. A community of inquirers. Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Black, M. (1962). Dewey’s philosophy of language. The Journal of Philosophy, 59(19), 505–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boersema, D. (2008). Pragmatism and reference. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brandom, R. (2007). Inferentialism and some of its challenges. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 74(3), 651–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chang, H. (2011a). The persistence of epistemic objects through scientific change. Erkenntnis, 75(3), 413–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dreon, R. (2014). Dewey on language: Elements for a non-dualistic approach. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, VI(2), 109–124.Google Scholar
  7. Eddington, A. (1928). The nature of the physical world. New York: The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
  8. Fesmire, S. (2014). Dewey. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gautier, C. (2017). Attitudes of knowledge and common sense. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, IX(2), 1–23.Google Scholar
  10. Gronda, R. (2012). Sense and construction. The development of Dewey’s theory of meaning (1884–1903). 2012, Ph.D. Dissertation.Google Scholar
  11. Gronda, R., & Turbanti, G. (2017). On the pragmatic content of science and common sense. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, 9(2), 1–24.Google Scholar
  12. Hempel, C. G. (1965). The theoretician’s dilemma: A study in the logic of theory construction. Aspects of scientific explanation: Essays in the philosophy of science (pp. 173–226). New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  13. Johnson, M. (2014). Experiencing language: What’s missing in linguistic pragmatism? European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, VI(2), 14–27.Google Scholar
  14. Mesthene, E. G. (1959). The role of language in the philosophy of John Dewey. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 19(4), 511–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Midtgarden, T. (2008). Dewey’s philosophy of language. Revue internationale de philosophie, 245(3), 257–272.Google Scholar
  16. Misak, C. (2004). Charles Sanders Peirce (1839–1914). In C. Misak (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Peirce (pp. 1–26). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Misak, C. J. (1995). Verificationism. Its History and Prospects. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Peirce (1986). Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A chronological edition, Volume 3. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Pratt, S. L. (1997). “A sailor in a storm”: Dewey on the meaning of language. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 33(4), 839–862.Google Scholar
  20. Putnam, H. (2017). Pragmatism and verificationism. In D. MacArthur (Ed.), Pragmatism as a way of life. The lasting legacy of William James and John Dewey (pp. 21–35). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ryan, F. X. (2011). Seeing together. Mind, matter, and the experimental outlook of John Dewey and Arthur F. Bentley. Great Barrington, MA: American Institute for Economic Research.Google Scholar
  22. Winther, R. G. (2014). James and Dewey on abstraction. The Pluralist, 9(2), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wittgenstein, L. (2009). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roberto Gronda
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Civiltà e Forme del SapereUniversità di PisaPisaItaly

Personalised recommendations